Evaluation and analysis of neurocognitive dysfunction in patients with colorectal cancer after radical resection: A retrospective study

被引:0
作者
Wang, Yu [1 ]
Wang, Chao [1 ]
Guo, Han [1 ]
Wang, Su-Hang [1 ]
Chen, Fang-Fang [1 ]
Chen, Qiao-Xiang [2 ]
Zhou, Kai [3 ]
机构
[1] Bengbu Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Four Branches Gen Surg, Bengbu 233000, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Anorectal Surg, Sch Med, Hangzhou 310030, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Bengbu Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, 287 Changhuai Rd, Bengbu 233000, Anhui, Peoples R China
来源
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY | 2024年 / 16卷 / 09期
关键词
Colorectal tumor; Laparoscopy; Postoperative cognitive complications; Risk factors; Prognostic model; SIMULTANEOUS LAPAROSCOPIC RESECTION; OPEN SURGERY; LIVER METASTASES; SHORT-TERM; SURVIVAL; SAFE; EFFICACY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.4240/wjgs.v16.i9.2893
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND With the continuous progress of colorectal cancer treatment technology, the survival rate of patients has improved significantly, but the problem of postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction has gradually attracted attention. AIM To analyze the risk factors for delayed postoperative neurocognitive recovery (DNR) after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery and constructed a risk prediction model to provide an evidence-based reference for the prevention and treatment of DNR after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS The clinical data of 227 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic surgery and regional cerebral saturation oxygenation (rScO(2)) monitoring at our hospital from March 2020 to July 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Common factors and potential factors affecting postoperative DNR were used as analysis variables, and univariate analysis and multifactor analysis were carried out step by step to determine the predictors of the model and construct a risk prediction model. The predictive performance of the model was assessed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the calibration curve was used to assess the fit of the model to the data, and a nomogram was drawn. In addition, 30 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria from January 2023 to July 2023 were selected for external verification of the prediction model. RESULTS The incidence of postoperative DNR in the modeling group was 15.4% (35/227). Multivariate analysis revealed that age, years of education, diabetes status, and the lowest rScO(2) value were the independent influencing factors of postoperative DNR (all P < 0.05). Accordingly, a DNR risk prediction model was constructed after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. The area under the ROC curve of the model was 0.757 (95%CI: 0.676-0.839, P < 0.001), and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test of the calibration curve suggested that the model was well fitted (P = 0.516). The C-index for external validation of the row was 0.617. CONCLUSION The DNR risk prediction model associated with rScO(2) monitoring can be used for individualized assessment of patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery and provides a clinical basis for the prevention of DNR after surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Robotic and laparoscopic surgical procedures for colorectal cancer
    Alekberzade, Aftandil
    Borisov, Vitaliy
    Kirov, Kiril
    Mena, Natmir
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 17 (02) : 375 - 381
  • [2] Synchronous totally laparoscopic management of colorectal cancer and resectable liver metastases: a single center experience
    Berti, Stefano
    Francone, Elisa
    Minuto, Michele
    Bonfante, Pierfrancesco
    Sagnelli, Carlo
    Bianchi, Claudio
    Tognoni, Alessandra
    Falco, Emilio
    [J]. LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2015, 400 (04) : 495 - 503
  • [3] k Decision making process in simultaneous laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases. Review of literature
    Cunha de Araujo, Raphael Leonardo
    Figueiredo, Marleny Novaes
    de Sanctis, Marco Aurelio
    Capochin Romagnolo, Luis Gustavo
    Linhares, Marcelo Moura
    Franchini Melani, Armando Geraldo
    Marescaux, Jacques
    [J]. ACTA CIRURGICA BRASILEIRA, 2020, 35 (03)
  • [4] Network meta-analysis of protocol-driven care and laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer
    Currie, A. C.
    Malietzis, G.
    Jenkins, J. T.
    Yamada, T.
    Ashrafian, H.
    Athanasiou, T.
    Okabayashi, K.
    Kennedy, R. H.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 103 (13) : 1783 - 1794
  • [5] Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in an elderly population with high comorbidity: a single centre experience
    Drews, Gerald
    Bohnsteen, Beatrix
    Knolle, Juergen
    Gradhand, Elise
    Wuerl, Peter
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2022, 37 (09) : 1963 - 1973
  • [6] Famiglietti F, 2018, ACTA GASTRO-ENT BELG, V81, P23
  • [7] Cost-effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic and open surgery in routine Swedish care for colorectal cancer
    Gehrman, Jacob
    Angenete, Eva
    Bjorholt, Ingela
    Lesen, Eva
    Haglind, Eva
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (10): : 4403 - 4412
  • [8] Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a case-control study
    Grosek, Jan
    Kosir, Jurij Ales
    Sever, Primoz
    Erculj, Vanja
    Tomazic, Ales
    [J]. RADIOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 55 (04) : 433 - 438
  • [9] Simultaneous Laparoscopic Resection of Colorectal Cancer and Synchronous Metastatic Liver Tumor
    Hayashi, Michihiro
    Komeda, Koji
    Inoue, Yoshihiro
    Shimizu, Tetsunosuke
    Asakuma, Mitsuhiro
    Hirokawa, Fumitoshi
    Okuda, Junji
    Tanaka, Keitaro
    Kondo, Keisaku
    Tanigawa, Nobuhiko
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SURGERY, 2011, 96 (01) : 74 - 81
  • [10] Karanikolic A, 2018, J BUON, V23, P302