Effect of posterior-stabilized and cruciate-retaining implants on three-dimensional kinematic characteristics after total knee arthroplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Gu, Cheng [1 ,2 ]
Luo, Xuming [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Hailong [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Baoxi [1 ,2 ]
Fu, Ming [1 ,2 ]
Luo, Weiliang [3 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Joint Surg, Guangzhou 510080, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Orthoped & Traumatol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Rehabil Med, Guangzhou 510080, Peoples R China
来源
JOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY | 2025年 / 36卷 / 01期
关键词
Arthroplasty; gait analysis; knee joint; knee prosthesis; osteoarthritis; KINETICS; DIFFERENCE;
D O I
10.52312/jdrs.2024.1836
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: This study aimed to analyze the effects of posteriorstabilized (PS) and cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on early postoperative three-dimensional (3D) dynamic and kinematic characteristics in patients with unilateral knee osteoarthritis (OA). Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 90 patients with unilateral TKA between February 2021 and September 2021 was conducted using a 3D kinematic analysis system before and six months after TKA. This patient group included 57 patients (10 males, 47 females; mean age: 69.5.7.5 years; range, 53 to 85 years) who underwent PS TKA and 33 patients (11 males, 22 females; mean age: 67.9.8.8 years; range, 45 to 86 years) who underwent CR TKA. The kinematic characteristics and clinical results of the two groups were compared. Clinical evaluation included the Hospital for Special Surgery knee score and range of motion (ROM). Twenty-eight healthy controls (9 males, 19 females; mean age: 64.5.2.9 years; range, 61 to 75 years) without knee OA matched for age, weight, height, and body mass index were recruited. The kinematic characteristics of the healthy control group were also evaluated. Results: The PS group exhibited significant changes in basic gait parameters after TKA, including cadence (p=0.046), stride time (p=0.011), opposite foot off (p<0.001), opposite foot contact (p=0.038), step time (p=0.005), double support period (p<0.001), and foot off (p=0.004). No significant differences were observed in the kinematic parameters before and after TKA between the PS and CR groups, such as knee angle, moment, and force. The dynamic ROM of the CR group was greater than that of the PS group (p<0.001). Both the PS and CR groups showed significant deficiencies in flexion and extension function, including knee flexion moment, extension force, maximum flexion angle, and dynamic ROM, compared to healthy individuals. Throughout the gait cycle, both the PS and CR groups showed better knee joint stability compared to healthy individuals. Conclusion: At six months postoperatively, both the PS and CR groups' gait patterns did not recover to a healthy state, and the CR group's gait pattern was more similar to OA. Compared to PS TKA, CR TKA allowed for greater dynamic ROM during gait. Despite exhibiting superior knee stability during gait, both implants' knee kinematics function remained inferior compared to healthy individuals.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 14
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcomes of Posterior-Stabilized Compared with Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Longo, Umile Giuseppe
    Ciuffreda, Mauro
    Mannering, Nicholas
    D'Andrea, Valerio
    Locher, Joel
    Salvatore, Giuseppe
    Denaro, Vincenzo
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2018, 31 (04) : 321 - 340
  • [2] Kinematic analysis of kneeling in cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasties
    Hamai, Satoshi
    Miura, Hiromasa
    Higaki, Hidehiko
    Matsuda, Shuichi
    Shimoto, Takeshi
    Sasaki, Kousuke
    Yoshizumi, Masaaki
    Okazaki, Ken
    Tsukamoto, Nobuaki
    Iwamoto, Yukihide
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2008, 26 (04) : 435 - 442
  • [3] Cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: The argument for posterior cruciate substitution
    Tria, AJ
    ARTHROPLASTY 2000: RECENT ADVANCES IN TOTAL JOINT REPLACEMENT, 2001, : 205 - 209
  • [4] What to Know for Selecting Cruciate-Retaining or Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Song, Sang Jun
    Park, Cheol Hee
    Bae, Dae Kyung
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2019, 11 (02) : 142 - 150
  • [5] Soft Tissue Tension in Cruciate-Retaining and Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Matsumoto, Tomoyuki
    Muratsu, Hirotsugu
    Kubo, Seiji
    Matsushita, Takehiko
    Kurosaka, Masahiro
    Kuroda, Ryosuke
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2011, 26 (05): : 788 - 795
  • [6] Posterior-stabilized versus cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty - Balancing the gap
    Tanzer, M
    Smith, K
    Burnett, S
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2002, 17 (07): : 813 - 819
  • [7] Posterior Cruciate-Retaining Versus Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis
    Bercik, Michael J.
    Joshi, Ashish
    Parvizi, Javad
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2013, 28 (03): : 439 - 444
  • [8] Load-Dependent Characteristics of Cruciate-Retaining and Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Biomechanical Study
    Lee, Jason H.
    Schwarzkopf, Ran
    Fraipont, Genevieve
    Bouzarif, Ghita
    Mcgarry, Michelle H.
    Lee, Thay Q.
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2024, 16 (04) : 570 - 577
  • [9] Effect of Joint Line Elevation after Posterior-stabilized and Cruciate-retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty on Clinical Function and Kinematics
    Ji Song-Jie
    Zhou Yi-Xin
    Jiang Xu
    Cheng Zhi-Yuan
    Wang Guang-Zhi
    Ding Hui
    Yang Ming-Lei
    Zhu Zhong-Lin
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2015, 128 (21) : 2866 - 2872
  • [10] Effect of Joint Line Elevation after Posterior-stabilized and Cruciate-retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty on Clinical Function and Kinematics
    Ji, Song-Jie
    Zhou, Yi-Xin
    Jiang, Xu
    Cheng, Zhi-Yuan
    Wang, Guang-Zhi
    Ding, Hui
    Yang, Ming-Lei
    Zhu, Zhong-Lin
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 128 (21) : 2866 - 2872