Influence of Growth, Capital Structure, Profitability, and Size on FTSE 100 Enterprise Value

被引:2
作者
Akin, Isik [1 ]
Akin, Meryem [1 ]
Satiroglu, Hakan [1 ]
Jhamb, Mahak [1 ]
机构
[1] Bath Spa Univ, Bath Business Sch, Business & Management Dept, Bath, England
关键词
capital structure; enterprise value; growth; profitability; Tobin's <italic>Q</italic>; RISK-MANAGEMENT; FIRM VALUE;
D O I
10.1002/jcaf.22761
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study aims to examine the influence of growth, capital structure, and profitability on enterprise value (EV) using data from the FTSE 100 companies. It seeks to identify the pivotal elements related to the EV and understand how they interact with each other. The study collects data from the annual reports of FTSE 100 companies for the period of 2019-2023. Regression analyses are conducted to examine the relationships between the variables after robust checks. The analysis reveals that capital structure and business size have a major impact on EV, with larger firms and higher levels of debt financing associated with higher EVs. However, there is no significant relationship between growth rate and EV. The impact of profitability on EV is mixed, with return on assets (ROA) showing a weak negative correlation and return on equity (ROE) showing a weak positive correlation. By offering particular insights into the factors that determine EV within the FTSE 100, this study fills in the gaps in the body of previous research. It offers valuable contributions to both academic research and practical applications by exploring the nuanced dynamics of the connections between EV and growth, capital structure, and profitability.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 168
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
2019, RES J FINANC ACCOUNT, DOI [10.7176/rjfa/10-20-07, 10.7176/RJFA/10-20-07, DOI 10.7176/RJFA/10-20-07]
[2]  
Alifiah MN, 2018, Management Science Letters, P593, DOI [10.5267/j.msl.2018.4.031, 10.5267/j.msl.2018.4, DOI 10.5267/J.MSL.2018.4, 10.5267/j.msl.2018.4.031, DOI 10.5267/J.MSL.2018.4.031, https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2018.4.031]
[3]  
Astivia O.L.O., 2019, Practical Assessment, Research Evaluation, V24, pn1
[4]  
Ataünal L, 2016, European Financial and Accounting Journal, V11, P25, DOI [10.18267/j.efaj.160, 10.18267/j.efaj.160, DOI 10.18267/J.EFAJ.160]
[5]   Corporate social responsibility, product market perception, and firm value [J].
Bardos, Katsiaryna Salavei ;
Ertugrul, Mine ;
Gao, Lucia Silva .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2020, 62
[6]   Corporate Sociopolitical Activism and Firm Value [J].
Bhagwat, Yashoda ;
Warren, Nooshin L. ;
Beck, Joshua T. ;
Watson, George F. .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2020, 84 (05) :1-21
[7]   The drivers and value of enterprise risk management: evidence from ERM ratings [J].
Bohnert, Alexander ;
Gatzert, Nadine ;
Hoyt, Robert E. ;
Lechner, Philipp .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2019, 25 (03) :234-255
[8]   Generalization of the Modigliani-Miller Theory for the Case of Variable Profit [J].
Brusov, Peter ;
Filatova, Tatiana ;
Orekhova, Natali ;
Kulik, Veniamin ;
Chang, She-, I ;
Lin, George .
MATHEMATICS, 2021, 9 (11)
[9]  
2020, Journal of Logistics Informatics and Service Science, DOI [10.33168/liss.2020.0103, 10.33168/LISS.2020.0103, DOI 10.33168/LISS.2020.0103]
[10]   The Effects of Firm Growth and Model Specification Choices on Tests of Earnings Management in Quarterly Settings [J].
Collins, Daniel W. ;
Pungaliya, Raunaq S. ;
Vijh, Anand M. .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2017, 92 (02) :69-100