Improving Comprehension of Consent Forms in Online Research: An Empirical Test of Four Interventions

被引:0
作者
Grant, Naomi K. [1 ]
Hamilton, Leah K. [2 ]
Ormita, Jenalyn M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Mt Royal Univ, Dept Psychol, 4825 Mt Royal Gate SW, Calgary, AB T3E 6K6, Canada
[2] Mt Royal Univ, Fac Business Commun Studies & Aviat, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychol, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
informed consent; ethics; ethical principles; experimental procedures; online; audiovisual; videoconference; INFORMED-CONSENT; PARTICIPANTS; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1177/15562646251321132
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Informed consent is a guiding ethical principle when conducting research involving human participants. Yet, consent forms are often skimmed or ignored, jeopardizing informed consent. In two experiments, we test four interventions designed to encourage participants to read online consent forms more carefully. Experiment 1 employed a 2 (length: short or long) by 2 (timing: fixed or free) by 2 (quiz: present or absent) between-participants design. We measured instruction-following and comprehension of the consent form. Results showed that fixed timing and a quiz led to greater instruction-following, but consent form length had no effect. Experiment 2 employed a 2 (length: short or long) by 3 (delivery format: live, audiovisual, standard written) between-participants design. Once again, length had no effect, but both live and audiovisual formats increased instruction-following and comprehension. We recommend that researchers consider using fixed timing, adding a quiz, and/or using alternative delivery formats to help participants make an informed decision.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 54
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Albala Ilene, 2010, IRB, V32, P7
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Am Psychol, V65, P493, DOI 10.1037/a0020168
[3]   Comprehension of Online Informed Consents: Can It Be Improved? [J].
Antonacopoulos, Nikolina M. Duvall ;
Serin, Ralph C. .
ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2016, 26 (03) :177-193
[4]   An Investigation of Personality Types within the HEXACO Personality Framework [J].
Ashton, Michael C. ;
Lee, Kibeom .
JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2009, 30 (04) :181-187
[5]  
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, 2022, Tri-council policy statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans
[6]   Some Researchers Wear Yellow Pants, but Even Fewer Participants Read Consent Forms: Exploring and Improving Consent Form Reading in Human Subjects Research [J].
Douglas, Benjamin D. ;
McGorray, Emma L. ;
Ewell, Patrick J. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2021, 26 (01) :61-68
[7]   Systematic review and meta-analysis of audio-visual information aids for informed consent for invasive healthcare procedures in clinical practice [J].
Farrell, Elinor H. ;
Whistance, Robert N. ;
Phillips, Katie ;
Morgan, Benjamin ;
Savage, Katherine ;
Lewis, Victoria ;
Kelly, Mark ;
Blazeby, Jane M. ;
Kinnersley, Paul ;
Edwards, Adrian .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2014, 94 (01) :20-32
[8]   Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research - A systematic review [J].
Flory, J ;
Emanuel, E .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (13) :1593-1601
[9]   Informed Consent for Online Research-Is Anybody Reading?: Assessing Comprehension and Individual Differences in Readings of Digital Consent Forms [J].
Geier, Caitlin ;
Adams, Robyn B. ;
Mitchell, Katharine M. ;
Holtz, Bree E. .
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2021, 16 (03) :154-164
[10]   Protecting Human Research Participants: Reading vs Understanding the Consent Form [J].
Holland, Jack ;
Browman, George ;
McDonald, Michael ;
Saginur, Raphael .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2013, 105 (13) :927-928