Indobufen versus aspirin in patients with indication for antiplatelet therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Cavalcante, Deivyd Vieira Silva [1 ]
Krishna, Mrinal Murali [2 ]
Joseph, Meghna [2 ]
Santos, Ana Clara Felix de Farias [3 ]
Mendes, Beatriz Ximenes [4 ]
Asbeg, Nicole [5 ]
Gomes, Wilton Francisco [6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Maranhao, Sao Luis, Brazil
[2] Med Coll Thiruvananthapuram, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
[3] City Univ Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Christus Univ Ctr, Fortaleza, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Bahia, Salvador, Brazil
[6] INC Hosp, Curitiba, Brazil
[7] Fac Pequeno Principe, Curitiba, Brazil
[8] Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericordia Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil
关键词
Indobufen; Aspirin; Antiplatelet therapy; Myocardial infarction; Ischemic stroke; Major bleeding; Composite vascular events; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.vph.2025.107465
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Introduction: Aspirin is commonly recommended for individuals who have experienced stroke or myocardial infarction (MI). Indobufen, a cyclooxygenase-1 inhibitor, has been studied as a potential alternative. We conducted a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) to compare indobufen with aspirin in patients requiring antiplatelet therapy. Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central for studies that compared indobufen and aspirin antiplatelet therapies. We focused on efficacy outcomes, such as composite vascular events, MI, and ischemic stroke, and safety outcomes, such as major bleeding and any bleeding. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics, and our analysis followed the PRISMA guidelines. Results: The review included 5 studies with 11,943 patients (indobufen n = 5952, 49.84 %), three involving postMI and two involving post-stroke patients. No significant differences were found between the groups in composite vascular events at 90 days (RR 0.84; 95 % CI 0.46-1.53; p = 0.560; I2 = 53 %) and 1-year (RR 1.13; 95 % CI 0.99-1.29; p = 0.08; I2 = 0 %). MI (RR 0.73; 95 % CI 0.43-1.22; p = 0.22; I2 = 0 %), ischemic stroke (RR 1.16; 95 % CI 0.99-1.37; p = 0.06; I2 = 0 %), and cardiovascular death (RR 1.35; 95 % CI 0.80-2.26; p = 0.257; I2 = 0 %) at 1-year also showed no significant differences. Major bleeding at 1 year (RR 0.73; 95 % CI 0.41-1.31; p = 0.297; I2 = 64 %) was comparable, but any bleeding at 1 year showed a significant difference (RR 0.65; 95 % CI 0.43-0.98; p = 0.03; I2 = 87 %) favoring indobufen. Subgroup analysis of RCTs showed marginally significant increased risk regarding ischemic stroke with indobufen (RR 1.18; 95 % CI 1.00-1.39; p = 0.05). Conclusion: The efficacy and safety of antiplatelet therapy with indobufen were comparable to those of aspirin alone. Therefore, indobufen can be considered as a suitable alternative for patients who are intolerant or hypersensitive to aspirin. Nevertheless, additional trials involving larger populations are required to establish their clinical applicability.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Amsterdam EA, 2014, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V64, P2713, DOI [10.1161/CIR.0000000000000134, 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.016, 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017, 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.10.011]
[2]   A systematic review and meta-analysis on the hazards of discontinuing or not adhering to aspirin among 50 279 patients at risk for coronary artery disease [J].
Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe G. L. ;
Lotrionte, Marzia ;
Agostoni, Pierfrancesco ;
Abbate, Antonio ;
Fusaro, Massimiliano ;
Burzotta, Francesco ;
Testa, Luca ;
Sheiban, Imad ;
Sangiorgi, Giuseppe .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (22) :2667-2674
[3]   Interpreting trial sequential analysis [J].
Chai-Adisaksopha, Chatree ;
Thorlund, Kristian ;
Iorio, Alfonso .
TRANSFUSION, 2016, 56 (12) :2918-2922
[4]   RESTRICTED MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD (REML) ESTIMATION OF VARIANCE COMPONENTS IN MIXED MODEL [J].
CORBEIL, RR ;
SEARLE, SR .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1976, 18 (01) :31-38
[5]   Real-world performance of indobufen versus aspirin after percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the ASPIRATION registry [J].
Dai, Chunfeng ;
Liu, Muyin ;
Yang, Zheng ;
Li, Youran ;
Zhou, You ;
Lu, Danbo ;
Xia, Yan ;
Chen, Ao ;
Li, Chenguang ;
Lu, Hao ;
Dai, Yuxiang ;
Ma, Jianying ;
Chen, Zhangwei ;
Qian, Juying ;
Ge, Junbo .
BMC MEDICINE, 2024, 22 (01)
[6]  
Deeks J., 2008, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA, P243, DOI [DOI 10.1002/9781119536604.CH10, 10.1002/9781119536604.ch10]
[7]   Aspirin hypersensitivity: a practical guide for cardiologists [J].
Grimaldi, Silvia ;
Migliorini, Paola ;
Puxeddu, Ilaria ;
Rossini, Roberta ;
De Caterina, Raffaele .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2024, 45 (19) :1716-1726
[8]  
Higgins J., 2011, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
[9]   Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses [J].
Higgins, JPT ;
Thompson, SG ;
Deeks, JJ ;
Altman, DG .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7414) :557-560
[10]   2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation [J].
Ibanez, Borja ;
James, Stefan ;
Agewall, Stefan ;
Antunes, Manuel J. ;
Bucciarelli-Ducci, Chiara ;
Bueno, Hector ;
Caforio, Alida L. P. ;
Crea, Filippo ;
Goudevenos, John A. ;
Halvorsen, Sigrun ;
Hindricks, Gerhard ;
Kastrati, Adnan ;
Lenzen, Mattie J. ;
Prescott, Eva ;
Roffi, Marco ;
Valgimigli, Marco ;
Varenhorst, Christoph ;
Vranckx, Pascal ;
Widimsky, Petr .
KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2018, 76 (02) :229-313