Modeling snow on sea ice using physics-guided machine learning

被引:0
|
作者
Prasad, Ayush [1 ]
Merkouriadi, Ioanna [1 ]
Nummelin, Aleksi [2 ]
机构
[1] Finnish Meteorol Inst, Earth Observat Res, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Finnish Meteorol Inst, Marine Res, Helsinki, Finland
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA SCIENCE | 2025年 / 3卷
关键词
emulator; physics-guided ml; SnowModel; Snow on sea ice; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1017/eds.2024.40; 10.1017/eds.2024.40.pr2; 10.1017/eds.2024.40.pr3; 10.1017/eds.2024.40.pr4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Snow is a crucial element of the sea ice system, affecting the sea ice growth and decay due to its low thermal conductivity and high albedo. Despite its importance, present-day climate models have a very idealized representation of snow, often including just one-layer thermodynamics, omitting several processes that shape its properties. Even though sophisticated snow process models exist, they tend to be excluded in climate modeling due to their prohibitive computational costs. For example, SnowModel is a numerical snow process model developed to simulate the evolution of snow depth and density, blowing snow redistribution and sublimation, snow grain size, and thermal conductivity in a spatially distributed, multilayer snowpack framework. SnowModel can simulate snow distributions on sea ice floes in high spatial (1-m horizontal grid) and temporal (1-hour time step) resolution. However, for simulations spanning over large regions, such as the Arctic Ocean, high-resolution runs face challenges of slow processing speeds and the need for large computational resources. To address these common issues in high-resolution numerical modeling, data-driven emulators are often used. However, these emulators have their caveats, primarily a lack of generalizability and inconsistency with physical laws. In our study, we address these challenges by using a physics-guided approach in developing our emulator. By integrating physical laws that govern changes in snow density due to compaction, we aim to create an emulator that is efficient while also adhering to essential physical principles. We evaluated this approach by comparing three machine learning models: long short-term memory (LSTM), physics-guided LSTM, and Random Forest, across five distinct Arctic regions. Our evaluations indicate that all models achieved high accuracy, with the physics-guided LSTM model demonstrating the most promising results in terms of accuracy and generalizability. Our approach offers a computationally faster way to emulate the SnowModel with high fidelity and a speedup of over 9000 times.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Surrogate Modeling using Physics-guided Learning
    Ozdagli, Ali
    Volgyesi, Peter
    Koutsoukos, Xenofon
    2023 CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS AND INTERNET-OF-THINGS WEEK, CPS-IOT WEEK WORKSHOPS, 2023, : 130 - 135
  • [2] Cyberattack Detection for Electric Vehicles Using Physics-Guided Machine Learning
    Guo, Lulu
    Ye, Jin
    Yang, Bowen
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION, 2021, 7 (03) : 2010 - 2022
  • [3] Structural dynamics simulation using a novel physics-guided machine learning method
    Yu, Yang
    Yao, Houpu
    Liu, Yongming
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 96
  • [4] Physics-Guided Machine Learning for Structural Metamodeling and Fragility Analysis
    Bond, Robert Bailey
    Ren, Pu
    Sun, Hao
    Hajjar, Jerome F.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL STRUCTURES IN SEISMIC AREAS, STESSA 2024 - VOL 1, 2024, 519 : 855 - 866
  • [5] Probabilistic physics-guided machine learning for fatigue data analysis
    Chen, Jie
    Liu, Yongming
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 168
  • [6] Physics-Guided Adversarial Machine Learning for Aircraft Systems Simulation
    Ben Braiek, Houssem
    Reid, Thomas
    Khomh, Foutse
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2023, 72 (03) : 1161 - 1175
  • [7] Physics-Guided Machine Learning from Simulation Data: An Application in Modeling Lake and River Systems
    Jia, Xiaowei
    Xie, Yiqun
    Li, Sheng
    Chen, Shengyu
    Zwart, Jacob
    Sadler, Jeffrey
    Appling, Alison
    Oliver, Samantha
    Read, Jordan
    2021 21ST IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING (ICDM 2021), 2021, : 270 - 279
  • [8] Physics-guided characterization and optimization of solar cells using surrogate machine learning model
    Ren, Zekun
    Oviedo, Felipe
    Xue, Hansong
    Thway, Muang
    Zhang, Kaicheng
    Li, Ning
    Perea, Jose Dario
    Layurova, Mariya
    Wang, Yue
    Tian, Siyu
    Heumueller, Thomas
    Birgersson, Erik
    Lin, Fen
    Aberle, Armin
    Sun, Shijing
    Peters, Ian Marius
    Stangl, Rolf
    Brabec, Christoph J.
    Buonassisi, Tonio
    2019 IEEE 46TH PHOTOVOLTAIC SPECIALISTS CONFERENCE (PVSC), 2019, : 3054 - 3058
  • [9] A physics-guided machine learning for multifunctional wave control in active metabeams
    Chen, Jiaji
    Chen, Yangyang
    Xu, Xianchen
    Zhou, Weijian
    Huang, Guoliang
    EXTREME MECHANICS LETTERS, 2022, 55
  • [10] Species reaction rate modelling based on physics-guided machine learning
    Nakazawa, Ryota
    Minamoto, Yuki
    Inoue, Nakamasa
    Tanahashi, Mamoru
    COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2022, 235