Investigation of Removal Efficiency of Microplastics at Different Process Stages of a Wastewater Treatment Plant in the Textile Industry in Southern China

被引:2
作者
Zhu, Yanjing [1 ]
Yang, Sijia [1 ]
Gustavsson, Mathias [2 ]
Huang, Wenli [3 ]
Gao, Si [1 ]
Wang, Rui [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Representat Off, IVL Swedish Environm Res Inst, Beijing 100005, Peoples R China
[2] IVL Swedish Environm Res Inst, S-10031 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Nankai Univ, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China
关键词
microplastics; textile production; printing and dyeing; removal efficiency; China; wastewater treatment;
D O I
10.3390/w17040574
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) play a crucial role in mitigating microplastic (MP) release to the environment. In this paper, a WWTP of a textile manufacturing plant in Guangdong, China, was investigated to identify MP characteristics and the effectiveness of wastewater treatment within the plant. Laser Direct Infrared (LDIR) and Liquid Chromatography with Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) were applied to quantify both the number and the mass of the microplastics in the effluent of the textile manufacturing plant where most of the wastewater were from three printing and dyeing lines. The study further investigated the MP removal efficiency of each wastewater treatment process of the industry-owned WWTP and analysed the removal mechanism of each step, highlighting limitations in detecting and eliminating MPs. It is observed that (1) the results from LDIR and LC-MS/MS can be complementary to each other; (2) the MP concentration in the influent was 1730 n/L by number and 13.52 mu g/L by mass; (3) the total removal efficiency of the WWTP were 99% by the number of MPs and 67.7% by the mass of MPs; (4) nine types of polymers have been identified in the influent, of which Polyamide (PA) was dominating; (5) hydrolysis acidification removed PA most; (6) aerobic tank, sand filter, and biological aerated filter (BAF) showed low removal efficiency; (7) coagulation and sedimentation tank had the highest removal efficiency to PET than any other processes.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Microplastics in wastewater treatment plants: sources, properties, removal efficiency, removal mechanisms, and interactions with pollutants [J].
Acarer, Seren .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 87 (03) :685-710
[2]   First evaluation of neustonic microplastics in Black Sea waters [J].
Aytan, Ulgen ;
Valente, Andre ;
Senturk, Yasemen ;
Usta, Riza ;
Sahin, Fatma Basak Esensoy ;
Mazlum, Rahsan Evren ;
Agirbas, Ertugrul .
MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2016, 119 :22-30
[3]   First evidence of microplastics isolated in European citizens' lower airway [J].
Baeza-Martinez, Carlos ;
Olmos, Sonia ;
Gonzalez-Pleiter, Miguel ;
Lopez-Castellanos, Joaquin ;
Garcia-Pachon, Eduardo ;
Masia-Canuto, Mar ;
Hernandez-Blasco, Luis ;
Bayo, Javier .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2022, 438
[4]   Microplastics: Detection in human samples, cell line studies, and health impacts [J].
Barcelo, Damia ;
Pico, Yolanda ;
Alfarhan, Ahmed H. .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 101
[5]  
Baresel Christian, 2019, Journal of Environmental Protection, V10, P1105, DOI 10.4236/jep.2019.109065
[6]   Microplastics in an urban wastewater treatment plant: The influence of physicochemical parameters and environmental factors [J].
Bayo, Javier ;
Olmos, Sonia ;
Lopez-Castellanos, Joaquin .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2020, 238
[7]   Review on alternatives for the reduction of textile microfibers emission to water [J].
Belzagui, Francisco ;
Gutierrez-Bouzan, Carmen .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 317
[8]  
Beringuela C., 2024, Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res. Technol. (IJISRT), V9, P1466, DOI [10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUL800, DOI 10.38124/IJISRT/IJISRT24JUL800]
[9]  
Brodin M, 2018, MICROPLASTICS IND LA
[10]   Microplastic fibre releases from industrial wastewater effluent: a textile wet-processing mill in China [J].
Chan, Carmen K. M. ;
Park, Curie ;
Chan, King Ming ;
Mak, Daniel C. W. ;
Fang, James K. H. ;
Mitrano, Denise M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY, 2021, 18 (03) :93-100