The impact of biopsy core length on the discrepancy in Gleason scores between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen

被引:0
作者
Guo, Cheng-hao [1 ,2 ]
Geng, Yin-shuai [1 ,3 ]
Zhu, Liang-yong [1 ,3 ]
Ding, Xue-fei [1 ,3 ]
Luan, Yang [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Yangzhou Univ, Med Sch, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Ansteel Gen Hosp, Dept Urol, Anshan, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[3] Yangzhou Univ, Northern Jiangsu Peoples Hosp, Dept Urol, 98 West Nantong Rd, Yangzhou 225001, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
BJUI COMPASS | 2025年 / 6卷 / 03期
关键词
Gleason score discrepancy; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; transperineal prostate biopsy; GRADING SYSTEM; CANCER; SIZE;
D O I
10.1002/bco2.70009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the impact of the biopsy core length on the discrepancy in Gleason score between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens. Patients and Methods Retrospective analysis of clinical data from 247 patients who underwent transperineal prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy of prostate cancer at our centre from 2022 to 2023. The clinical data included age, pre-biopsy prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, prostate volume, number of biopsy needles, number of positive biopsy needles, biopsy core length, biopsy Gleason score and post-radical prostatectomy Gleason score. Statistics were analysed by SPSS26. Result On histopathological examination, no changes in the Gleason score were observed in 127 (51.4%) patients, whereas the Gleason score was upgraded in 101 (40.9%) patients and downgraded in 19 (7.7%) patients at radical prostatectomy. Average biopsy core length for Gleason score upgraded on radical prostatectomy (44.3 %, n = 101) was 11.11 +/- 1.34 mm compared to 11.88 +/- 1.03 mm(p < 0.01)for Gleason score consistent(55.7 %, n = 127). The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between the biopsy core length (P < 0.01, OR = 0.556, 95%CI: 0.429--0.722) and prostate volume (P < 0.05, OR = 0.982, 95%CI: 0.429--0.722), with both factors being significantly correlated with radical prostatectomy Gleason score increase. Furthermore, these variables were identified as independent predictors of radical prostatectomy Gleason score increase and exhibited a negative correlation. The biopsy core length was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, with a cutoff value of 11.4 mm for the accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer (AUC: 0.702, sensitivity: 75.6%, specificity 51.2%, P < 0.001). Conclusion The concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy may be improved with a longer biopsy core length. To enhance the consistency of Gleason scores between biopsy and radical specimens, it is recommended that the biopsy core length be at least 11.4 mm. Patients with a smaller prostate volume are at a higher risk of experiencing discordant pathological grades between biopsy and radical prostatectomy.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] The Impact of Prostate Cancer Upgrading and Upstaging on Biochemical Recurrence and Cancer-Specific Survival
    Bakavicius, Arnas
    Drevinskaite, Mingaile
    Daniunaite, Kristina
    Barisiene, Marija
    Jarmalaite, Sonata
    Jankevicius, Feliksas
    [J]. MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2020, 56 (02):
  • [2] The evolving Gleason grading system
    Chen, Ni
    Zhou, Qiao
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 28 (01) : 58 - 64
  • [3] Combination of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and transperineal template-guided mapping prostate biopsy to determine potential candidates for focal therapy
    Choi, Young Hyo
    Lee, Chun Un
    Song, Wan
    Jeong, Byong Chang
    Seo, Seong Il
    Jeon, Seong Soo
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    Jeon, Hwang Gyun
    Lee, Seung-Ju
    [J]. PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 11 (02) : 100 - 106
  • [4] Comparing the Gleason prostate biopsy and Gleason prostatectomy grading system: The Lahey Clinic Medical Center experience and an international meta-analysis
    Cohen, Michael S.
    Hanley, Robert S.
    Kurteva, Teodora
    Ruthazer, Robin
    Silverman, Mark L.
    Sorcini, Andrea
    Hamawy, Karim
    Roth, Robert A.
    Tuerk, Ingolf
    Libertino, John A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (02) : 371 - 381
  • [5] Prostate Size as a Predictor of Gleason Score Upgrading in Patients With Low Risk Prostate Cancer
    Davies, Judson D.
    Aghazadeh, Monty A.
    Phillips, Sharon
    Salem, Shady
    Chang, Sam S.
    Clark, Peter E.
    Cookson, Michael S.
    Davis, Rodney
    Herrell, S. Duke
    Penson, David F.
    Smith, Joseph A., Jr.
    Barocas, Daniel A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (06) : 2221 - 2227
  • [6] de Cobelli Ottavio, 2015, Urol Oncol, V33, DOI 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.02.004
  • [7] The impact of core length on prostate cancer diagnosis during a standard 14-core prostate biopsy scheme
    Dell'Atti, Lucio
    Ippolito, Carmelo
    [J]. UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2016, 83 (04) : 186 - 189
  • [8] A multicentric study on accurate grading of prostate cancer with systematic and MRI/US fusion targeted biopsies: comparison with final histopathology after radical prostatectomy
    Diamand, R.
    Oderda, M.
    Obeid, W. Al Hajj
    Albisinni, S.
    Van Velthoven, R.
    Fasolis, G.
    Simone, G.
    Ferriero, M.
    Roche, J-B.
    Piechaud, T.
    Pastore, A.
    Carbone, A.
    Fiard, G.
    Descotes, J-L.
    Marra, G.
    Gontero, P.
    Altobelli, E.
    Papalia, R.
    Kumar, P.
    Eldred-Evans, D.
    Giacobbe, A.
    Muto, G.
    Lacetera, V.
    Beatrici, V.
    Roumeguere, T.
    Peltier, A.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 37 (10) : 2109 - 2117
  • [9] Application of 16 G Biopsy Needle in Transperineal Template-Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Ding, Xue-fei
    Luan, Yang
    Xia, An-le
    Zhu, Liang-yong
    Xiao, Qin
    Chen, Ji
    Chen, Hao-peng
    Han, Yue-xing
    Liu, Zhong
    [J]. UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2021, : 909 - 913
  • [10] Upgrading and Downgrading of Prostate Cancer from Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy: Incidence and Predictive Factors Using the Modified Gleason Grading System and Factoring in Tertiary Grades
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Feng, Zhaoyong
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Pierorazio, Phillip M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (05) : 1019 - 1024