机构:
El Colegio Frontera Sur ECOSUR Chiapas, Dept Agr Soc & Environm, Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico
Univ Estadual Ceara UECE, Sociol Grad Program, Fortaleza, Brazil
Univ Estadual Paulista UNESP, Grad Program Terr Dev Latin Amer & Caribbean Terr, Sao Paulo, BrazilBrazils Univ Estadual Ceara UECE, Fortaleza, Brazil
Rosset, Peter Michael
[2
,3
,4
]
机构:
[1] Brazils Univ Estadual Ceara UECE, Fortaleza, Brazil
[2] El Colegio Frontera Sur ECOSUR Chiapas, Dept Agr Soc & Environm, Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico
[3] Univ Estadual Ceara UECE, Sociol Grad Program, Fortaleza, Brazil
[4] Univ Estadual Paulista UNESP, Grad Program Terr Dev Latin Amer & Caribbean Terr, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Autonomy;
Social movements;
Peasantry;
Indigenous peoples;
Latin America;
EDUCATION;
D O I:
10.1177/0094582X241289103
中图分类号:
K9 [地理];
学科分类号:
0705 ;
摘要:
This paper seeks to categorize the forms of autonomy developed by Indigenous and peasant movements in Latin America into three types: a) de jure autonomies versus de facto autonomies; b) explicit autonomies versus implicit autonomies; and c) (mono)ethnic autonomies versus popular or class autonomies. We argue that the debate between these conceptions takes on a possible strategic importance when it comes to the dialogue between Indigenous and peasant struggles regarding the defense of territory as well as in the conception of peasant autonomy, understood as a strategy of struggle and local self-governance.
机构:
Middle East Tech Univ, Polit Sci & Int Relat, Northern Cyprus Campus, Ankara, TurkeyMiddle East Tech Univ, Polit Sci & Int Relat, Northern Cyprus Campus, Ankara, Turkey