A framework for evaluating women's leadership programmes

被引:0
作者
Stephenson, Elise [1 ]
Mikolajczak, Gosia [1 ]
Ryan, Michelle [1 ]
Fisher, Alexandra N. [1 ]
Hayes, Jack [1 ]
Sojo, Victor [2 ]
Weaving, Morgan [3 ]
Tanjitpiyanond, Mai
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
[3] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA USA
关键词
evaluation; gender equalities; women's leadership; women's leadership programmes; GENDER; DIVERSITY; ORGANIZATIONS; APPOINTMENT; EXPLORATION; DYNAMICS; DESIGN; IMPACT; BOARD;
D O I
10.1177/13563890241284626
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The increase in women's leadership programmes has been paralleled by a growing demand on behalf of private and public sector stakeholders for pragmatic reporting on impact assessment. Yet, there remains limited research and tools available for conducting evaluation of women's leadership programmes. Based on an extensive review of the literature and co-design with a sub-national Australian government, we develop an evaluation framework for women's leadership programmes. Our framework identifies critical measures and indicators at a micro, meso and macro level that can be used by researchers and practitioners to measure the impact of women's leadership programmes on women (and minoritised genders), organisations and structures - wider gender equality. We argue that evaluation is valuable in understanding the impact that women's leadership programmes have as well as the impact they do not have - providing more rigorous analysis of the sometimes tenuous impacts of women's leadership programmes. Such evaluation is critical to identifying women's leadership programmes' roles in tackling gender inequalities and women's continued under-representation in leadership. It may also help identify other interventions and policy and legislative change needed to bring about a desired change.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 141
页数:31
相关论文
共 88 条
  • [1] Gendered organizations and intersectionality: problems and possibilities
    Acker, Joan
    [J]. EQUALITY DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION, 2012, 31 (03): : 214 - +
  • [2] Leadership: Current Theories, Research, and Future Directions
    Avolio, Bruce J.
    Walumbwa, Fred O.
    Weber, Todd J.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 60 : 421 - 449
  • [3] Real-world approaches to assessing the impact of environmental research on policy
    Bell, Sarah
    Shaw, Ben
    Boaz, Annette
    [J]. RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2011, 20 (03) : 227 - 237
  • [4] Bilimoria D., 2008, HUM RESOUR MANAGE-US, V47
  • [5] Bilimoria D, 2014, WOMEN IN STEM CAREERS: INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON INCREASING WORKFORCE PARTICIPATION, ADVANCEMENT AND LEADERSHIP, P146
  • [6] Gender stereotypes and the evaluation of men and women in military training
    Boldry, J
    Wood, W
    Kashy, DA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 2001, 57 (04) : 689 - 705
  • [7] Burkinshaw P, 2017, ADM SCI, V7, DOI 10.3390/admsci7030030
  • [8] Center for Theory of Change, 2022, WHAT IS THEORY CHANG
  • [9] Improving decisions that affect gender equality in the workplace
    Chang, Edward H.
    Milkman, Katherine L.
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS, 2020, 49 (01)
  • [10] Chasserio S., 2023, EUR J TRAIN DEV, V48