Diagnostic performance of intracystic carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) versus glucose in differentiation of mucinous and non-mucinous pancreatic cysts

Background and Objectives Pancreatic cysts have various potential for malignant transformation. Differentiating mucinous from non-mucinous cysts is crucial to make the right decision about further management, since mucinous cysts carry the risk of malignancy. Using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided fine needle aspiration to determine intracystic carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels is the recommended method for identifying mucinous cysts, although intracystic glucose assessment has also proved to be an effective tool. This study aims to compare the diagnostic performance of intracystic glucose and CEA in distinguishing between mucinous and non-mucinous pancreatic cystic lesions.Methods In this single center study, we prospectively collected and analyzed the data of 91 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) with cytological analysis and measurement of intracystic CEA and glucose levels. The cyst type was classified based on radiological and EUS morphology, string sign, CEA, cytological and histological findings in resected cases. The diagnosis was established retrospectively by three experienced gastroenterologists blinded for glucose level in cases without definitive cytology or histology. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, the positive- and negative predictive value of glucose and CEA respectively, and compared the two methods.Results The sensitivity of intracystic glucose versus CEA proved to be 96.2% vs. 69.2% in identifying mucinous cysts, while the specificity of glucose was shown to be 79.5%, compared to 100% for CEA.Conclusion Intracystic glucose is a sensitive, easily accessible biomarker in identifying mucinous pancreatic cysts, however, the specificity is lower compared to CEA. The measurement of intracystic glucose level could help in decision-making in daily clinical practice, however the diagnostic performance of the method remains inferior to "through-the-needle" techniques, such as confocal laser endomicroscopy and Moray forceps biopsy.