Ethical Dimensions of Clinical Data Sharing by US Health Care Organizations for Purposes beyond Direct Patient Care: Interviews with Health Care Leaders

被引:0
作者
Jackson, Brian R. [1 ]
Kaplan, Bonnie [2 ,3 ]
Schreiber, Richard [4 ,5 ,6 ]
DeMuro, Paul R. [7 ]
Nichols-Johnson, Victoria [8 ]
Ozeran, Larry [9 ]
Solomonides, Anthony [10 ]
Koppel, Ross [11 ,12 ,13 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[2] Yale Univ, Solomon Ctr Hlth Law & Policy, Ctr Biomed Data Sci, Yale Sch Publ Hlth,Bioeth Ctr,Dept Biostat Hlth In, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Yale Univ, Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Program Biomed Eth, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Penn State Hlth, Informat Serv, Camp Hill, PA USA
[5] Univ Maryland, Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Grad Sch Med, Dept Biomed Informat & Data Sci, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Univ Maryland, Grad Sch, Sci Program, Clin Informat, Baltimore, MD USA
[7] Epstein Becker Green, Dallas, TX USA
[8] Southern Illinois Univ, Sch Med, Springfield, IL USA
[9] Clin Informat Inc, Woodland, CA USA
[10] Endeavor Hlth, Res Inst, Evanston, IL USA
[11] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Biomed Informat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[12] Univ Penn, Leonard Davis Inst Hlth Econ, Philadelphia, PA USA
[13] SUNY Buffalo, Jacobs Sch Med & Biomed Sci, Dept Biomed Informat, Buffalo, NY USA
来源
APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS | 2025年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
health data sharing; privacy; HIPAA; personal health information; bioethics; PRIVACY; INFORMATION; REIDENTIFICATION; PROTECTION;
D O I
10.1055/a-2432-0329
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives This study aimed to (1) empirically investigate current practices and analyze ethical dimensions of clinical data sharing by health care organizations for uses other than treatment, payment, and operations; and (2) make recommendations to inform research and policy for health care organizations to protect patients' privacy and autonomy when sharing data with unrelated third parties. Methods Semistructured interviews and surveys involving 24 informatics leaders from 22 U.S. health care organizations, accompanied by thematic and ethical analyses. Results We found considerable heterogeneity across organizations in policies and practices. Respondents understood "data sharing" and "research" in very different ways. Their interpretations of these terms ranged from making data available for academic and public health uses, and to health information exchanges; to selling data for corporate research; and to contracting with aggregators for future resale or use. The nine interview themes were that health care organizations: (1) share clinical data with many types of organizations, (2) have a variety of motivations for sharing data, (3) do not make data-sharing policies readily available, (4) have widely varying data-sharing approval processes, (5) most commonly rely on Health Insurance and Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) de-identification to protect privacy, (6) were concerned about clinical data use by electronic health record vendors, (7) lacked data-sharing transparency to the general public, (8) allowed individual patients little control over sharing of their data, and (9) had not yet changed data-sharing practices within the year following the U.S. Supreme Court 2022 decision denying rights to abortion. Conclusion Our analysis identified gaps between ethical principles and health care organizations' data-sharing policies and practices. To better align clinical data-sharing practices with patient expectations and biomedical ethical principles, we recommend updating HIPAA, including re-identification and upstream sharing restrictions in data-sharing contracts, better coordination across data-sharing approval processes, fuller transparency and opt-out options for patients, and accountability for data-sharing and consequent harms.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 100
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation)
[2]   Data Sharing An Ethical and Scientific Imperative [J].
Bauchner, Howard ;
Golub, Robert M. ;
Fontanarosa, Phil B. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 315 (12) :1237-1239
[3]   Evaluating re-identification risks with respect to the HIPAA privacy rule [J].
Benitez, Kathleen ;
Malin, Bradley .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2010, 17 (02) :169-177
[4]   Patients want granular privacy control over health information in electronic medical records [J].
Caine, Kelly ;
Hanania, Rima .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2013, 20 (01) :7-15
[5]   The double-edged sword of electronic health records: implications for patient disclosure [J].
Campos-Castillo, Celeste ;
Anthony, Denise L. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2015, 22 (E1) :E130-E140
[6]   Does deidentification of data from wearable devices give us a false sense of security? A systematic review [J].
Chikwetu, Lucy ;
Miao, Yu ;
Woldetensae, Melat K. ;
Bell, Diarra ;
Goldenholz, Daniel M. ;
Dunn, Jessilyn .
LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH, 2023, 5 (04) :e239-e247
[7]   Big Data, Big Tech, and Protecting Patient Privacy [J].
Cohen, I. Glenn ;
Mello, Michelle M. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 322 (12) :1141-1142
[8]  
Cohen J K., 2019, Ascension data partnership sparks federal probe-Mod Healthcare
[9]   Ten principles for data sharing and commercialization [J].
Cole, Curtis L. ;
Sengupta, Soumitra ;
Rossetti , Sarah ;
Vawdrey, David K. ;
Halaas, Michael ;
Maddox, Thomas M. ;
Gordon, Geoff ;
Dave, Trushna ;
Payne, Philip R. O. ;
Williams, Andrew E. ;
Estrin, Deborah .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2021, 28 (03) :646-649
[10]  
Cross B., 2016, CBS News Austin