Effect of relative humidity on the accuracy, scanning time, and number of photograms of dentate complete arch intraoral digital scans

被引:7
作者
Agustin-Panadero, Ruben [1 ]
Estada, Maria Isabel Clemente
Perez-Barquero, Jorge Alonso [2 ]
Zubizarreta-Macho, Alvaro [3 ]
Revilla-Leon, Marta [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Gomez-Polo, Miguel [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Fac Med & Dent, Dept Stomatol, Valencia, Spain
[2] Alfonso X El Sabio Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Implantol, Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Salamanca, Fac Med & Dent, Dept Surg, Salamanca, Spain
[4] Univ Washington, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Grad Prosthodont, Seattle, WA USA
[5] Kois Ctr, Res & Digital Dent, Seattle, WA USA
[6] Tufts Univ, Sch Dent Med, Dept Prosthodont, Boston, MA USA
[7] Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthet Dent, Madrid, Spain
[8] Univ Complutense Madrid, Sch Dent, Postgrad program, Adv Implant Prosthodont, Madrid, Spain
关键词
SCANNERS; TEMPERATURE; RELIABILITY; IMPRESSIONS; ENVIRONMENT; PRECISION; COMPOSITE;
D O I
10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.04.002
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. Intraoral scanners (IOSs) have been used in dentistry for diagnostic and treatment purposes; however, the influence of environmental factors such as humidity or temperature on the accuracy of intraoral scanning is uncertain. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of relative humidity and ambient temperature on the accuracy, scanning time, and number of photograms of dentate complete arch intraoral digital scans. Material and methods. A completely dentate mandibular typodont was digitized by using a dental laboratory scanner. Four calibrated spheres were attached following the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard 20 896. A watertight box was designed to simulate 4 different relative humidity conditions (50%, 70%, 80%, and 90%) (n = 30). An IOS (TRIOS 3) was used to obtain a total of 120 complete arch digital scans (n = 120). Scanning time and number of photograms of each specimen were recorded. All the scans were exported and compared with the master cast by using a reverse engineering software program. The linear distances among the reference spheres were used to calculate trueness and precision. A unifactorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Levene tests followed by the post hoc Bonferroni test were used to analyze trueness and precision data, respectively. A unifactorial ANOVA followed by a post hoc Bonferroni test was also conducted to analyze scanning time and the number of photogram data. Results. Statistically significant differences were found in trueness, precision, number of photograms, and scanning time (P<.05). Regarding trueness and precision, significant differences were found between the 50% and 70% relative humidity groups and the 80% and 90% relative humidity groups (P<.01). Regarding scanning time and number of photograms, significant differences were obtained among all groups, except between the 80% and 90% relative humidity groups (P<.01). Conclusions. The relative humidity conditions tested influenced accuracy, scanning time, and number of photograms in complete arch intraoral digital scans. High relative humidity conditions resulted in the decreased scanning accuracy, longer scanning time, and greater number of photograms of complete arch intraoral digital scans. (J Prosthet Dent 2025;133:865-71)
引用
收藏
页码:865 / 871
页数:7
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Evaluation of the accuracy of 2 digital intraoral scanners: A 3D analysis study [J].
Alzahrani, Saeed J. ;
EL-Hammali, Hind ;
Morgano, Steven M. ;
Elkassaby, Heba .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2021, 126 (06) :787-792
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, ISO 20896-1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ISO 22112
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ISO 20795-1
[5]   Validity and reliability of intraoral scanners compared to conventional gypsum models measurements: a systematic review [J].
Aragon, Monica L. C. ;
Pontes, Luana F. ;
Bichara, Livia M. ;
Flores-Mir, Carlos ;
Normando, David .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2016, 38 (04) :429-434
[6]  
Besnault C, 2003, AM J DENT, V16, P186
[7]   Effect of scan substrates on accuracy of 7 intraoral digital impression systems using human maxilla model [J].
Bocklet, Chris ;
Renne, Walter ;
Mennito, Anthony ;
Bacro, Thierry ;
Latham, Jason ;
Evans, Zachary ;
Ludlow, Mark ;
Kelly, Abigail ;
Nash, Jansen .
ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2019, 22 :168-174
[8]   Scanning accuracy and scanning area discrepancies of intraoral digital scans acquired at varying scanning distances and angulations among 4 different intraoral scanners [J].
Button, Heather ;
Kois, John C. ;
Barmak, Abdul B. ;
Zeitler, Jonathan M. ;
Rutkunas, Vygandas ;
Revilla-Leon, Marta .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2024, 132 (05) :1044-1060
[9]   Effect of saliva isolation and intraoral light levels on performance of intraoral scanners [J].
Camc, Hasan ;
Salmanpour, Farhad .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2020, 158 (05) :759-766
[10]  
Charlton David G, 2006, Gen Dent, V54, P113