A literature review on corporate governance and ESG research: Emerging trends and future directions☆

被引:8
作者
Buchetti, Bruno [1 ]
Arduino, Francesca Romana [2 ]
Perdichizzi, Salvatore [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Econ & Management, Padua, Italy
[2] Luiss Univ, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Padua, Yunus Social Business Ctr, Dept Econ & Management, Padua, Italy
关键词
Non-financial reporting; Corporate Governance; ESG metrics; Content analysis; Literature review; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION; FIRM PERFORMANCE; GENDER DIVERSITY; DISCLOSURE; BOARDS; MANAGEMENT; OWNERSHIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103759
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Extant research emphasizes that corporate governance (CG) significantly influences environmental, social, and governance (ESG) outcomes. This paper undertakes a content analysis and reviews 91 academic articles published in 41 journals over the past 14 years (2010-2023). We examine the role of CG in ESG outcomes by focusing on CG themes, ESG indicators, theories, countries, and empirical methodologies used to address endogeneity. The findings show that several factors collectively impact ESG outcomes positively. Such factors include female directors, institutional investors, independent directors, CEO characteristics, directors' compensation, and sustainability committees. Relatedly, the findings also suggest that family ownership may potentially exert a detrimental effect on ESG performance. Despite the burgeoning evidence on CG and ESG outcomes, we highlight several understudied areas, such as directors' ESG expertise in specific ESG-related sectors and CEO tenure. Furthermore, we call for more research focusing on non-financial firms, particularly in European countries. Given the current studies' reliance on archival methodologies, we encourage future research to adopt diverse approaches, such as qualitative and mixed research methods. Finally, we discuss several research avenues, identify gaps in the literature, and outline a future research agenda.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 158 条
[1]   Conceptualising the contemporary corporate value creation process [J].
Adams, Carol A. .
ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL, 2017, 30 (04) :906-931
[2]   A theory of friendly boards [J].
Adams, Renee B. ;
Ferreira, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2007, 62 (01) :217-250
[3]   Performance incentives within firms: The effect of managerial responsibility [J].
Aggarwal, RK ;
Samwick, AA .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2003, 58 (04) :1613-1649
[4]   The effect of the EU's directive on non-financial disclosures of the oil and gas industry [J].
Al-Dosari, Mona ;
Marques, Ana ;
Fairbrass, Jenny .
ACCOUNTING FORUM, 2023, 47 (02) :166-197
[5]   ESG disclosure and firm performance before and after IR The moderating role of governance mechanisms [J].
Albitar, Khaldoon ;
Hussainey, Khaled ;
Kolade, Nasir ;
Gerged, Ali Meftah .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2020, 28 (03) :429-444
[6]   Corporate sustainability and institutional shareholders: The pressure of social responsible pension funds on environmental firm practices [J].
Alda, Mercedes .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 28 (06) :1060-1071
[7]   Board gender diversity, quotas, and ESG disclosure: Global evidence [J].
Alkhawaja, Abdallah ;
Hu, Fang ;
Johl, Shireenjit ;
Nadarajah, Sivathaasan .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 90
[8]   Do institutional investors encourage firm to social disclosure? The stakeholder salience perspective [J].
Aluchna, Maria ;
Roszkowska-Menkes, Maria ;
Kaminski, Bogumil ;
Bosek-Rak, Dominika .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2022, 142 :674-682
[9]   Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey [J].
Amel-Zadeh, Amir ;
Serafeim, George .
FINANCIAL ANALYSTS JOURNAL, 2018, 74 (03) :87-103
[10]  
[Anonymous], 10. Johnson R, Monke J. Farm Bill Primer: What Is the Farm Bill. Congressional Research Service Accessed June 22, 2023. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF12047