US Higher Education's Civic Responsibility to Educate for Informal Political Representation

被引:1
作者
Brust, Caitlin Murphy [1 ]
Widmaier, Hannah [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Educ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Philosophy, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
higher education; civic education; civic equality; social justice; informal political representation;
D O I
10.1111/edth.12661
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In this paper, Caitlin Murphy Brust and Hannah Widmaier begin with the assumption that highly selective institutions of higher education in the United States have a duty to promote civic equality. They employ Wendy Salkin's theory of informal political representation to examine how highly selective institutions should go about promoting civic equality. According to Salkin's theory, someone serves as an informal political representative (IPR) when they speak or act on behalf of others, without having been selected to do so via a systematized selection procedure. Brust and Widmaier argue that as part of their civic educational missions, highly selective institutions should educate their students for informal political representation, and this includes equipping students to (1) serve as effective IPRs, (2) be responsible audience members to others' informal political representation, and (3) deliberate carefully and with open-mindedness about when they should or should not take on the role of IPR. Brust and Widmaier examine two types of injustice that students from marginalized communities face at highly selective institutions, and they explore how education for informal political representation might ameliorate those injustices. The authors conclude by offering some practical suggestions to institutional policymakers and educators.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 734
页数:20
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Allen D.S., 2016, Education and Equality
[2]  
Alonso Johanna, 2023, INSIDE HIGHER E 0327
[3]  
Armstrong ElizabethA., 2013, Paying for the Party: How College Maintains Inequality
[4]   Beyond the Incident: Institutional Predictors of Student Collective Action [J].
Baker, Dominique J. ;
Blissett, Richard S. L. .
JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 89 (02) :184-207
[5]  
Bastedo MN, 2009, REV HIGH EDUC, V32, P209
[6]  
Ben-Porath S., 2023, Cancel wars: How universities can foster free speech, promote inclusion, and renew democracy
[7]  
Bickford S., 1996, DISSONANCE DEMOCRACY
[8]   Becoming a Better College Teacher (If You're Lucky) [J].
Brighouse, Harry .
DAEDALUS, 2019, 148 (04) :14-28
[9]  
Brighouse Harry, 2015, AIMS HIGHER ED PROBL, P1
[10]  
Brighouse Harry, 2019, MELLON RES FORUM VAL