Revisiting values in evaluation: exploring the role of values in shaping evaluation practices and their influences on decision-making within English higher education providers

被引:0
作者
Kelly, Catherine [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Values; New Public Management; Evaluation use; Higher education; Social equity; Organisational behaviour; WIDENING PARTICIPATION; IMPACT; POLICY;
D O I
10.1007/s10734-024-01335-6
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Theoretical and empirical contributions to research on evaluation have advanced our understanding of how values influence evaluation practice. Yet rather than understand how values shape evaluation and its use, research on the evaluation of widening participation (WP) programmes delivered by English higher education (HE) providers has focused on methodological deficits. Rather, this study explores the complexity of how national policy, organisational imperatives and the individual values of staff responsible for WP within HE providers influence how evaluation is practised and used to inform decision-making. The results of semi-structured interviews with 17 staff members spanning the organisational hierarchy of three diverse English HE providers highlight conflicts between staff values, job roles and responsibilities and espoused organisational values, and how they can influence symbolic and legitimising evaluation practices. Alternatively, at the individual level staff values support the process and instrumental use of evaluation to inform programme improvements. The findings identify implications for how HE providers can shape their evaluation systems, and how staff choose to enact evaluation within their programme areas.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Higher Education Review
[2]   Values at Work: The Impact of Personal Values in Organisations [J].
Arieli, Sharon ;
Sagiv, Lilach ;
Roccas, Sonia .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW-PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE, 2020, 69 (02) :230-275
[3]  
Austen L., 2022, Working together on access and participation evaluation
[4]   Neoliberalism, new public management and the sustainable development agenda of higher education: history, contradictions and synergies [J].
Bessant, Sophie E. F. ;
Robinson, Zoe P. ;
Ormerod, R. Mark .
ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2015, 21 (03) :417-432
[5]  
Blake J., 2022, WonkHE
[6]   Reconceptualising fair access to highly academically selective universities [J].
Boliver, Vikki ;
Banerjee, Pallavi ;
Gorard, Stephen ;
Powell, Mandy .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 2022, 84 (01) :85-100
[7]   The political functions of expert knowledge: knowledge and legitimation in European Union immigration policy [J].
Boswell, Christina .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2008, 15 (04) :471-488
[8]  
BRAUN V, 2006, QUALITATIVE RES PSYC, V3, P77, DOI [10.1037/13620-004, DOI 10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]
[9]   'A starting point for your journey, not a map': Nikki Hayfield in conversation with Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke about thematic analysis [J].
Braun, Virginia ;
Clarke, Victoria ;
Hayfield, Nikki .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 19 (02) :424-445
[10]  
Burke P.J., 2018, INT STUDIES WIDENING, V5, P10