A comparative study of traditional machine learning and hybrid fuzzy inference system machine learning models for air quality index forecasting

被引:0
|
作者
Ordenshiya, K. M. [1 ]
Revathi, Gk [1 ]
机构
[1] Vellore Inst Technol Chennai, Sch Adv Sci, Dept Math, Chennai Campus, Chennai 600127, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Air quality index; Artificial intelligence; Fuzzy inference system; Machine learning algorithm; Simulink; PREDICTION; POLLUTION; LOGIC;
D O I
10.1007/s41060-025-00720-3
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Air pollution from urban activities poses significant health risks, underscoring the need for effective monitoring of the air quality index (AQI). This paper presents a novel approach for AQI prediction by integrating a Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy inference system (TS-FIS) with machine learning (ML). Traditional ML techniques often encounter difficulties in converting regression datasets into classification formats, particularly when conventional labelling methods are inadequate. The TS-FIS model, developed using MATLAB, integrates both pollutant and meteorological data, simplifies input grouping and rule management, and converts regression data into classification levels such as healthy, moderate, and unhealthy using IF-THEN rules. The regression outputs are validated with metrics including RMSE (0.48), MSE (0.23), MAE (0.45), and MAPE (1.77). A random forest classifier (RFC) trained on the TS-FIS outputs achieves maximum 99.85% accuracy, with F1 score, precision, and recall, surpassing traditional methods, which achieve maximum 99.63% accuracy. The study also includes a comparative analysis of ML-based FIS models for AQI prediction with different parameters and membership functions, alongside a traditional ML model for AQI classification using RFC. The key novelty of this work lies in the fine-tuning of membership functions and parameters, which significantly enhances the performance of the ML-based FIS model, demonstrating its superiority. These results underscore the model's potential for practical applications in environmental monitoring and management.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative Analysis of different Machine learning Models for Load Forecasting
    Bareth, Rashmi
    Kochar, Matushree
    Yadav, Anamika
    2023 IEEE IAS GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON RENEWABLE ENERGY AND HYDROGEN TECHNOLOGIES, GLOBCONHT, 2023,
  • [22] Air Quality Index Analysis of Indian Cities During COVID-19 Using Machine Learning Models: A Comparative Study
    Hota, Lopamudra
    Dash, Prasant Kumar
    Sahoo, Kshira Sagar
    Gandomi, Amir H.
    2021 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING & MACHINE INTELLIGENCE (ISCMI 2021), 2021, : 27 - 31
  • [23] Machine Learning Techniques for Air Quality Forecasting and Study on Real-Time Air Quality Monitoring
    Hable-Khandekar, Varsha
    Srinath, Pravin
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING, COMMUNICATION, CONTROL AND AUTOMATION (ICCUBEA), 2017,
  • [24] A Comparative Study of Time Series, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning Models for Forecasting Global Price of Wheat
    Abhishek Yadav
    Operations Research Forum, 5 (4)
  • [25] A Comparative Assessment of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for the Daily River Streamflow Forecasting
    Danesh, Malihe
    Gharehbaghi, Amin
    Mehdizadeh, Saeid
    Danesh, Amirhossein
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2024, : 1911 - 1930
  • [26] Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning, Hybrid, and Deep Learning Forecasting Models: Evidence from European Financial Markets and Bitcoins
    Ampountolas, Apostolos
    FORECASTING, 2023, 5 (02): : 472 - 486
  • [27] Evaluation of machine learning and deep learning models for daily air quality index prediction in Delhi city, India
    Pande, Chaitanya Baliram
    Radhadevi, Latha
    Satyanarayana, Murthy Bandaru
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2024, 196 (12)
  • [28] Enhanced Forecasting and Assessment of Urban Air Quality by an Automated Machine Learning System: The AI-Air
    Yang, Jiayu
    Ke, Huabing
    Gong, Sunling
    Wang, Yaqiang
    Zhang, Lei
    Zhou, Chunhong
    Mo, Jingyue
    You, Yan
    EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCE, 2025, 12 (01)
  • [29] Forecasting Bitcoin Volatility Using Hybrid GARCH Models with Machine Learning
    Zahid, Mamoona
    Iqbal, Farhat
    Koutmos, Dimitrios
    RISKS, 2022, 10 (12)
  • [30] Skew Index: a machine learning forecasting approach
    Vanegas, Esteban
    Mora-Valencia, Andres
    RISK MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2025, 27 (01):