SYNPRED: prediction of drug combination effects in cancer using different synergy metrics and ensemble learning

被引:0
作者
Preto, Antonio J. [1 ,2 ]
Matos-Filipe, Pedro [1 ]
Mourao, Joana [4 ]
Moreira, Irina S. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coimbra, Ctr Neurosci & Cell Biol, P-3004504 Coimbra, Portugal
[2] Univ Coimbra, Inst Interdisciplinary Res IIIUC, PhD Programme Expt Biol & Biomed, P-3030789 Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Univ Coimbra, Dept Life Sci, P-3000456 Coimbra, Portugal
[4] CIBB Ctr Innovat Biomed & Biotechnol, CNC Ctr Neurosci & Cell Biol, P-3004504 Coimbra, Portugal
来源
GIGASCIENCE | 2022年 / 11卷
关键词
ensemble learning; interpretability; omics; biophysics; drug synergy; cancer; QUANTIFICATION; SCREEN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background:In cancer research, high-throughput screening technologies produce large amounts of multiomics data from differentpopulations and cell types. However, analysis of such data encounters difficulties due to disease heterogeneity, further exacerbated byhuman biological complexity and genomic variability. The specific profile of cancer as a disease (or, more realistically, a set of diseases)urges the development of approaches that maximize the effect while minimizing the dosage of drugs. Now is the time to redefine theapproach to drug discovery, bringing an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered informational view that integrates the relevant scientificfields and explores new territories. Results:Here, we show SYNPRED, an interdisciplinary approach that leverages specifically designed ensembles of AI algorithms, aswell as links omics and biophysical traits to predict anticancer drug synergy. It uses 5 reference models (Bliss, Highest Single Agent,Loewe, Zero Interaction Potency, and Combination Sensitivity Score), which, coupled with AI algorithms, allowed us to attain the oneswith the best predictive performance and pinpoint the most appropriate reference model for synergy prediction, often overlooked insimilar studies. By using an independent test set, SYNPRED exhibits state-of-the-art performance metrics either in the classification(accuracy, 0.85; precision, 0.91; recall, 0.90; area under the receiver operating characteristic, 0.80; and F1-score, 0.91) or in the regressionmodels, mainly when using the Combination Sensitivity Score synergy reference model (root mean square error, 11.07; mean squarederror, 122.61; Pearson, 0.86; mean absolute error, 7.43; Spearman, 0.87). Moreover, data interpretability was achieved by deploying themost current and robust feature importance approaches. A simple web-based application was constructed, allowing easy access bynonexpert researchers. Conclusions:The performance of SYNPRED rivals that of the existing methods that tackle the same problem, yielding unbiased resultstrained with one of the most comprehensive datasets available (NCI ALMANAC). The leveraging of different reference models alloweddeeper insights into which of them can be more appropriately used for synergy prediction. The Combination Sensitivity Score clearlystood out with improved performance among the full scope of surveyed approaches and synergy reference models. Furthermore,SYNPRED takes a particular focus on data interpretability, which has been in the spotlight lately when using the most advanced AItechniques.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [1] Abadi M., 2016, arXiv
  • [2] User's guide to correlation coefficients
    Akoglu, Haldun
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 18 (03): : 91 - 93
  • [3] AN INTRODUCTION TO KERNEL AND NEAREST-NEIGHBOR NONPARAMETRIC REGRESSION
    ALTMAN, NS
    [J]. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1992, 46 (03) : 175 - 185
  • [4] Bairoch Amos, 2018, J Biomol Tech, V29, P25, DOI 10.7171/jbt.18-2902-002
  • [5] The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity
    Barretina, Jordi
    Caponigro, Giordano
    Stransky, Nicolas
    Venkatesan, Kavitha
    Margolin, Adam A.
    Kim, Sungjoon
    Wilson, Christopher J.
    Lehar, Joseph
    Kryukov, Gregory V.
    Sonkin, Dmitriy
    Reddy, Anupama
    Liu, Manway
    Murray, Lauren
    Berger, Michael F.
    Monahan, John E.
    Morais, Paula
    Meltzer, Jodi
    Korejwa, Adam
    Jane-Valbuena, Judit
    Mapa, Felipa A.
    Thibault, Joseph
    Bric-Furlong, Eva
    Raman, Pichai
    Shipway, Aaron
    Engels, Ingo H.
    Cheng, Jill
    Yu, Guoying K.
    Yu, Jianjun
    Aspesi, Peter, Jr.
    de Silva, Melanie
    Jagtap, Kalpana
    Jones, Michael D.
    Wang, Li
    Hatton, Charles
    Palescandolo, Emanuele
    Gupta, Supriya
    Mahan, Scott
    Sougnez, Carrie
    Onofrio, Robert C.
    Liefeld, Ted
    MacConaill, Laura
    Winckler, Wendy
    Reich, Michael
    Li, Nanxin
    Mesirov, Jill P.
    Gabriel, Stacey B.
    Getz, Gad
    Ardlie, Kristin
    Chan, Vivien
    Myer, Vic E.
    [J]. NATURE, 2012, 483 (7391) : 603 - 607
  • [6] The toxicity of poisons applied jointly
    Bliss, CI
    [J]. ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 1939, 26 (03) : 585 - 615
  • [7] Botchkarev A., 2019, INTERDISCIP J INF KN, V14, P045, DOI DOI 10.28945/4184
  • [8] Combination therapies for the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer: current and future prospects
    Brandao, Mariana
    Ponde, Noam F.
    Poggio, Francesca
    Kotecki, Nuria
    Salis, Mauren
    Lambertini, Matteo
    de Azambuja, Evandro
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2018, 18 (07) : 629 - 649
  • [9] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [10] 3In-silico Prediction of Synergistic Anti-Cancer Drug Combinations Using Multi-omics Data
    Celebi, Remzi
    Walk, Oliver Bear Don't
    Movva, Rajiv
    Alpsoy, Semih
    Dumontier, Michel
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)