Validation of artificial intelligence-based bowel preparation assessment in screening colonoscopy (with video)

被引:2
|
作者
Yao, Liwen [1 ,2 ]
Xiong, Huizhen [1 ]
Li, Qiucheng [1 ]
Wang, Wen [2 ,3 ]
Wu, Zhifeng [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Tan, Xia [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Luo, Chaijie [2 ,3 ,4 ]
You, Hang [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Chenxia [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Lihui [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Lu, Zihua [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yu, Honggang [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Chen, Honglei [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 8, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Ctr, Shenzhen 518033, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Renmin Hosp, Key Lab Hubei Prov Digest Syst Dis, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Univ, Renmin Hosp, Hubei Prov Clin Res Ctr Digest Dis Minimally Invas, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[4] Wuhan Univ, Renmin Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Wuhan 430060, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
QUANTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2024.04.015
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims: Accurate bowel preparation assessment is essential for determining colonoscopy screening intervals. Patients with suboptimal bowel preparation are at a high risk of missing >5 mm adenomas and should undergo an early repeat colonoscopy. In this study, we used artificial intelligence (AI) to evaluate bowel preparation and validated the ability of the system to accurately identify patients who are at high risk of having >5 mm adenomas missed due to inadequate bowel preparation. Methods: This prospective, single-center, observational study was conducted at the Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, from October 8, 2021, to November 9, 2022. Eligible patients who underwent screening colonoscopy were consecutively enrolled. The AI assessed bowel preparation using the e-Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (e-BBPS) while endoscopists made evaluations using BBPS. If both BBPS and e-BBPS deemed preparation adequate, the patient immediately underwent a second colonoscopy; otherwise, the patient underwent bowel re-cleansing before the second colonoscopy. Results: Among the 393 patients, 72 adenomas >5 mm in size were detected; 27 adenomas >5 mm in size were missed. In unqualified-AI patients, the >5 mm adenoma miss rate (AMR) was significantly higher than in qualified-AI patients (35.71% vs 13.19% [P = .0056]; odds ratio [OR], .2734 [95% CI, .1139-.6565]), as were the AMR (50.89% vs 20.79% [P < .001]; OR, .2532 [95% CI, .1583-.4052]) and >5 mm polyp miss rate (35.82% vs 19.48% [P = .0152]; OR, .4335 [95% CI, .2288-.8213]). Conclusions: This study confirmed that patients classified as inadequate by AI exhibited an unacceptable >5 mm AMR, providing key evidence for implementing AI in guiding bowel re-cleansing and potentially standardizing future colonoscopy screening. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT05145712.)
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Artificial Intelligence-Based Video Assessment of Neonatal State
    Nishio, Monami
    Takeda, Naohisa
    Miyata, Ryutaro
    Ito, Yushi
    Isayama, Tetsuya
    Shi, Shoi
    Wada, Yuka
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2025, 8 (01)
  • [2] Smartphone application for artificial intelligence-based evaluation of stool state during bowel preparation before colonoscopy
    Inaba, Atsushi
    Shinmura, Kensuke
    Matsuzaki, Hiroki
    Takeshita, Nobuyoshi
    Wakabayashi, Masashi
    Sunakawa, Hironori
    Nakajo, Keiichiro
    Murano, Tatsuro
    Kadota, Tomohiro
    Ikematsu, Hiroaki
    Yano, Tomonori
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2024, 36 (12) : 1338 - 1346
  • [3] Artificial intelligence for the assessment of bowel preparation
    Lee, Ji Young
    Calderwood, Audrey H.
    Karnes, William
    Requa, James
    Jacobson, Brian C.
    Wallace, Michael B.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 95 (03) : 512 - 518
  • [4] Commentary: Artificial intelligence-based screening of retina
    Bansal, Mayank
    Rangarajan, Krithika
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 70 (04) : 1144 - 1144
  • [5] Artificial intelligence-based tolerance assessment methods
    Che, RS
    Cui, CC
    Ye, D
    Huang, QC
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INSTRUMENTATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL 3, 2002, : 161 - 166
  • [6] Towards artificial intelligence-based assessment systems
    Rose Luckin
    Nature Human Behaviour, 1
  • [7] Artificial intelligence in screening colonoscopy
    Schrader, Christoph
    Wallstabe, Ingo
    Schiefke, Ingolf
    COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2022, 44 (02) : 110 - 115
  • [8] Towards artificial intelligence-based assessment systems
    Luckin, Rose
    NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2017, 1 (03):
  • [9] Validation of artificial intelligence-based quantitative coronary angiography
    Kim, Do-Hyun
    Kim, Sun-Hwa
    Chu, Hyun-Wook
    Kang, Si-Hyuck
    Yoon, Chang-Hwan
    Youn, Tae-Jin
    Chae, In-Ho
    DIGITAL HEALTH, 2024, 10
  • [10] Improving bowel preparation for colonoscopy with a smartphone application driven by artificial intelligence
    Zhu, Yan
    Zhang, Dan-Feng
    Wu, Hui-Li
    Fu, Pei-Yao
    Feng, Li
    Zhuang, Kun
    Geng, Zi-Han
    Li, Kun-Kun
    Zhang, Xiao-Hong
    Zhu, Bo-Qun
    Qin, Wen-Zheng
    Lin, Sheng-Li
    Zhang, Zhen
    Chen, Tian-Yin
    Huang, Yuan
    Xu, Xiao-Yue
    Liu, Jing-Zheng
    Wang, Shuo
    Zhang, Wei
    Li, Quan-Lin
    Zhou, Ping-Hong
    NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2023, 6 (01)