Artificial INtelligence to Support Informed DEcision-making (INSIDE) for Improved Literature Analysis in Oncology

被引:0
|
作者
Stenzl, Arnulf [1 ]
Armstrong, Andrew J. [2 ]
Sboner, Andrea [3 ]
Ghith, Jenny [4 ]
Serfass, Lucile [5 ]
Bland, Christopher S. [4 ]
Schijvenaars, Bob J. A. [6 ]
Sternberg, Cora N. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Tubingen, Dept Urol, Tubingen, Germany
[2] Duke Univ, Duke Canc Inst Ctr Prostate & Urol Canc, Dept Med, Durham, NC USA
[3] Weill Cornell Med, Englander Inst Precis Med, Meyer Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, New York, NY USA
[4] Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA USA
[5] Pfizer Oncol, Paris, France
[6] Digital Sci, London, England
[7] Weill Cornell Med, Englander Inst Precis Med, Meyer Canc Ctr, Dept Med, New York, NY USA
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2024年 / 10卷 / 06期
关键词
INSIDE PC; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Prostate cancer therapy; Literature extraction; Therapeutic sequencing; Semantic analysis; Literature search;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2024.05.022
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Defining optimal therapeutic sequencing strategies in prostate cancer (PC) is challenging and may be assisted by artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools for an analysis of the medical literature. Objective: To demonstrate that INSIDE PC can help clinicians query the literature on therapeutic sequencing in PC and to develop previously unestablished practices for evaluating the outputs of AI-based support platforms. Design, setting, and participants: INSIDE PC was developed by customizing PubMed Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers. Publications were ranked and aggregated for relevance using data visualization and analytics. Publications returned by INSIDE PC and PubMed were given normalized discounted cumulative gain (nDCG) scores by PC experts reflecting ranking and relevance. Intervention: INSIDE PC for AI-based semantic literature analysis. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: INSIDE PC was evaluated for relevance and accuracy for three test questions on the efficacy of therapeutic sequencing of systemic therapies in PC. Results and limitations: In this initial evaluation, INSIDE PC outperformed PubMed for question 1 (novel hormonal therapy [NHT] followed by NHT) for the top five, ten, and 20 publications (nDCG score, +43, +33, and +30 percentage points [pps], respectively). For question 2 (NHT followed by poly [adenosine diphosphate ribose] polymerase inhibitors [PARPi]), INSIDE PC and PubMed performed similarly. For question 3 (NHT or PARPi followed by 177Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen-617), INSIDE PC outperformed PubMed for the top five, ten, and 20 publications (+16, +4, and +5 pps, respectively). Conclusions: We applied INSIDE PC to develop standards for evaluating the performance of AI-based tools for literature extraction. INSIDE PC performed competitively with PubMed and can assist clinicians with therapeutic sequencing in PC. Patient summary: The medical literature is often very difficult for doctors and patients to search. In this report, we describe INSIDE PC-an artificial intelligence (AI) system created to help search articles published in medical journals and determine the best order of treatments for advanced prostate cancer in a much better time frame. We found that INSIDE PC works as well as another search tool, PubMed, a widely used resource for searching and retrieving articles published in medical journals. Our work with INSIDE PC shows new ways in which AI can be used to search published articles in medical journals and how these systems might be evaluated to support shared decision-making. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:1011 / 1018
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using Artificial Intelligence to Support Informed Decision-Making on BRAF Mutation Testing
    Webster, Jennifer
    Ghith, Jennifer
    Penner, Orion
    Lieu, Christopher H.
    Schijvenaars, Bob J. A.
    JCO PRECISION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 8
  • [2] Artificial intelligence to support clinical decision-making processes
    Garcia-Vidal, Carolina
    Sanjuan, Gemma
    Puerta-Alcalde, Pedro
    Moreno-Garcia, Estela
    Soriano, Alex
    EBIOMEDICINE, 2019, 46 : 27 - 29
  • [3] Artificial Intelligence and Decision-Making
    Dear, Keith
    RUSI JOURNAL, 2019, 164 (5-6): : 18 - 25
  • [4] Support or automation in decision-making: the role of artificial intelligence for the project
    Ferrante, Tiziana
    Romagnoli, Federica
    TECHNE-JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY FOR ARCHITECTURE AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 25 : 68 - 77
  • [5] Artificial Intelligence and Surgical Decision-making
    Loftus, Tyler J.
    Tighe, Patrick J.
    Filiberto, Amanda C.
    Efron, Philip A.
    Brakenridge, Scott C.
    Mohr, Alicia M.
    Rashidi, Parisa
    Upchurch, Gilbert R., Jr.
    Bihorac, Azra
    JAMA SURGERY, 2020, 155 (02) : 148 - 158
  • [6] Optimization, Decision-making and Artificial Intelligence
    Mittal, Mandeep
    Shah, Nita H.
    Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications, 2022, 15 (01):
  • [7] THEOLOGY OF DECISION-MAKING AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
    Yegoryevskiy, Mefodiy
    VESTNIK PRAVOSLAVNOGO SVYATO-TIKHONOVSKOGO GUMANITARNOGO UNIVERSITETA-SERIYA I-BOGOSLOVIE-FILOSOFIYA-RELIGIOVEDENIE, 2024, (116): : 44 - 56
  • [8] Progressive role of artificial intelligence in treatment decision-making in the field of medical oncology
    Bongurala, Archana Reddy
    Save, Dhaval
    Virmani, Ankit
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2025, 12
  • [9] Intelligence in Governance for Support in Decision-Making
    Monteiro de Andrade, Luiz Odorico
    CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2012, 17 (04): : 829 - U16
  • [10] Fostering Informed Consent and Shared Decision-Making in Maternity Nursing With the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence
    Penner, Sara Bickweat
    Mercado, Nicholas R.
    Bernstein, Samantha
    Erickson, Elise
    Dubois, Melissa Anne
    Dreisbach, Caitlin
    MCN-THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-CHILD NURSING, 2025, 50 (02) : 78 - 85