Through the Pupils' Lens: Multilingual Effort in First and Second Language Listening

被引:2
作者
Bsharat-Maalouf, Dana [1 ]
Schmidtke, Jens [2 ]
Degani, Tamar [1 ]
Karawani, Hanin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Haifa, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Eshkol Tower,Off 815,199 Aba Khoushy Ave, IL-3498838 Haifa, Israel
[2] Univ Haifa, Haifa Ctr German & European Studies, Haifa, Israel
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
First language; Listening effort; Multilingualism; Pupillometry; Second language; Speech perception; DUAL-TASK PARADIGMS; BILINGUAL LISTENERS; SPEECH-PERCEPTION; BACKGROUND-NOISE; WORKING-MEMORY; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; WORD RECOGNITION; PROCESSING LOAD; LANGUAGE; ENGLISH;
D O I
10.1097/AUD.0000000000001602
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objectives:The present study aimed to examine the involvement of listening effort among multilinguals in their first (L1) and second (L2) languages in quiet and noisy listening conditions and investigate how the presence of a constraining context within sentences influences listening effort.Design:A group of 46 young adult Arabic (L1)-Hebrew (L2) multilinguals participated in a listening task. This task aimed to assess participants' perceptual performance and the effort they exert (as measured through pupillometry) while listening to single words and sentences presented in their L1 and L2, in quiet and noisy environments (signal to noise ratio = 0 dB).Results:Listening in quiet was easier than in noise, supported by both perceptual and pupillometry results. Perceptually, multilinguals performed similarly and reached ceiling levels in both languages in quiet. However, under noisy conditions, perceptual accuracy was significantly lower in L2, especially when processing sentences. Critically, pupil dilation was larger and more prolonged when listening to L2 than L1 stimuli. This difference was observed even in the quiet condition. Contextual support resulted in better perceptual performance of high-predictability sentences compared with low-predictability sentences, but only in L1 under noisy conditions. In L2, pupillometry showed increased effort when listening to high-predictability sentences compared with low-predictability sentences, but this increased effort did not lead to better understanding. In fact, in noise, speech perception was lower in high-predictability L2 sentences compared with low-predictability ones.Conclusions:The findings underscore the importance of examining listening effort in multilingual speech processing and suggest that increased effort may be present in multilingual's L2 within clinical and educational settings.
引用
收藏
页码:494 / 511
页数:18
相关论文
共 148 条
[81]   Context effects in the L2: Evidence for compensatory mechanisms [J].
Norman, Tal ;
Degani, Tamar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BILINGUALISM, 2024, 28 (03) :279-315
[82]   Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response [J].
Ohlenforst, Barbara ;
Wendt, Dorothea ;
Kramer, Sophia E. ;
Naylor, Graham ;
Zekveld, Adriana A. ;
Lunner, Thomas .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2018, 365 :90-99
[83]   Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation [J].
Ohlenforst, Barbara ;
Zekveld, Adriana A. ;
Lunner, Thomas ;
Wendt, Dorothea ;
Naylor, Graham ;
Wang, Yang ;
Versfeld, Niek J. ;
Kramer, Sophia E. .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2017, 351 :68-79
[84]   Listening Effort in Native and Nonnative English-Speaking Children Using Low Linguistic Single- and Dual-Task Paradigms [J].
Oosthuizen, Ilze ;
Picou, Erin M. ;
Pottas, Lidia ;
Myburgh, Hermanus Carel ;
Swanepoel, De Wet .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2020, 63 (06) :1979-1989
[85]   Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception [J].
Peng, Z. Ellen ;
Wang, Lily M. .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2019, 62 (04) :1068-1081
[86]   How Social Psychological Factors May Modulate Auditory and Cognitive Functioning During Listening [J].
Pichora-Fuller, M. Kathleen .
EAR AND HEARING, 2016, 37 :92S-100S
[87]   Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL) [J].
Pichora-Fuller, M. Kathleen ;
Kramer, Sophia E. ;
Eckert, Mark A. ;
Edwards, Brent ;
Hornsby, Benjamin W. Y. ;
Humes, Larry E. ;
Lemke, Ulrike ;
Lunner, Thomas ;
Matthen, Mohan ;
Mackersie, Carol L. ;
Naylor, Graham ;
Phillips, Natalie A. ;
Richter, Michael ;
Rudner, Mary ;
Sommers, Mitchell S. ;
Tremblay, Kelly L. ;
Wingfield, Arthur .
EAR AND HEARING, 2016, 37 :5S-27S
[88]  
Picou EM, 2014, EAR HEARING, V35, P611, DOI 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000055
[89]   How Hearing Aids, Background Noise, and Visual Cues Influence Objective Listening Effort [J].
Picou, Erin M. ;
Ricketts, Todd A. ;
Hornsby, Benjamin W. Y. .
EAR AND HEARING, 2013, 34 (05) :e52-e64
[90]   The Presence of Another Individual Influences Listening Effort, But Not Performance [J].
Pielage, Hidde ;
Zekveld, Adriana A. ;
Saunders, Gabrielle H. ;
Versfeld, Niek J. ;
Lunner, Thomas ;
Kramer, Sophia E. .
EAR AND HEARING, 2021, 42 (06) :1577-1589