Does Pollution Control Foster Innovation? Quasi-Experimental Evidence From China's Two-Control Zone Policy

被引:0
|
作者
Cieply, Isea [1 ]
Wang, Feicheng [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Fac Business & Econ, Gottingen, Lower Saxony, Germany
[2] Univ Groningen, Fac Econ & Business, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
China; environmental regulation; innovation; patent application; two-control zone policy; DIRECT-INVESTMENT EVIDENCE; CLEAN-AIR ACT; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; PERFORMANCE EVIDENCE; PORTER HYPOTHESIS; GREEN INNOVATION; REGULATIONS; TRADE;
D O I
10.1111/rode.13182
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This paper studies the impact of environmental regulation on firms' innovation by analyzing the two-control zone (TCZ) policy in China. This policy imposed stricter sulfur dioxide emission requirements on firms in regulated cities. Leveraging its uneven implementation across regions, we compare the innovative development of firms in cities subject to stricter environmental regulations with those that were not. Using a comprehensive dataset of firm patent applications between 1995 and 2007, we find that firms in regulated regions increased their patent applications following the introduction of the TCZ policy compared to those in unregulated regions, suggesting an innovation-enhancing impact of stricter environmental policies. Channel analysis reveals that this positive impact was associated with firms' innovation capabilities through human capital and R&D investments, government support, financial resources, and market selection favoring innovative firms. We also find stronger effects among firms in low-emission industries and cities with stringent policy enforcement. These findings align with the weak variant of the Porter Hypothesis that predicts a positive effect of environmental regulation on innovation.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Does haze pollution damage urban innovation? Empirical evidence from China
    Zhao, Chunkai
    Deng, Min
    Cao, Xiguang
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (13) : 16334 - 16349
  • [22] Does the Porter hypothesis hold in China? evidence from the "2+26" regional air pollution treatment policy
    Luo, Weijie
    Xiang, Di
    Zhang, Xiaoming
    ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2024, 29 (04) : 319 - 337
  • [23] How does privatization affect cash dividends? Quasi-experimental evidence from China
    Hu, Jinshuai
    Jiang, Haiyan
    Wu, Yibing
    EMERGING MARKETS REVIEW, 2023, 57
  • [24] Does command-and-control regulation promote green innovation performance? Evidence from China's industrial enterprises
    Tang, Kai
    Qiu, Yuan
    Zhou, Di
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 712
  • [25] Trick or treat? Quasi-experimental evidence from electricity spot market policy in China
    Cao, Ming
    Zhang, Fan
    Li, Jianglong
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2024,
  • [26] The abatement effect of total emission control policy: Evidence from China
    Zhu, Junpeng
    Wu, Shaohui
    Xu, Junbing
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2023, 126
  • [27] Can government low-carbon regulation stimulate urban green innovation? Quasi-experimental evidence from China's low-carbon city pilot policy
    Chen, Chaofan
    Lin, Yongsheng
    Lv, Ning
    Zhang, Wei
    Sun, Yawen
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2022, 54 (57) : 6559 - 6579
  • [28] Synergy between pollution control and carbon reduction: China?s evidence
    Zhu, Junpeng
    Wu, Shaohui
    Xu, Junbing
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2023, 119
  • [29] Air pollution and innovation-evidence from quasi-natural experiment of China's Huai River policy
    Qiao, Zhuo
    Li, Zhaohua
    Wang, Yanzhi
    REVIEW OF QUANTITATIVE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING, 2023, 60 (02) : 425 - 443
  • [30] Does central supervision enhance local environmental enforcement? Quasi-experimental evidence from China
    Zhang, Bing
    Chen, Xiaolan
    Guo, Huanxiu
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2018, 164 : 70 - 90