Can ChatGPT 4.0 Diagnose Acute Aortic Dissection? Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Medical Diagnostics

被引:0
作者
Goyal, Aman [1 ,2 ]
Tariq, Muhammad Daoud [3 ]
Ahsan, Areeba [3 ]
Brateanu, Andrei [4 ]
机构
[1] Seth GS Med Coll & KEM Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Mumbai, India
[2] Alchemist Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Panchkula, India
[3] Fdn Univ, Med Coll, Dept Internal Med, Islamabad, Pakistan
[4] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Internal Med, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
artificial intelligence; cardiology; ChatGPT; large language models; diagnostics; aortic dissection;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.01.010
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Acute aortic dissection (AD) is a critical condition characterized by high mortality and frequent misdiagnoses, primarily due to symptom overlap with other medical pathologies. This study explores the diagnostic utility of ChatGPT 4.0, an artificial intelligence model developed by OpenAI, in identifying acute AD from patients' presentations and general physical examination findings documented in published case reports. A systematic search was conducted on the PubMed database using the search term "acute aortic dissection," applying filters for articles published within the past year and categorized as case reports. The primary symptoms and physical examination details from each case were inputted into ChatGPT 4.0, which was prompted to generate three differential diagnoses and one main provisional diagnosis based on the case presentation. The search yielded a total of 163 results, from which 10 case reports were randomly selected. The patient demographics across all 10 case reports demonstrated an age range of 29 to 82 years, with equal gender distribution (5 males, 5 females) and hypertension as the most prevalent baseline comorbidity. ChatGPT 4.0 accurately identified acute AD as one of the top three differential diagnoses in all selected cases and identified acute AD as the provisional diagnosis in five of the 10 cases. In conclusion, while ChatGPT 4.0 demonstrates potential in suggesting acute AD as a differential diagnosis based on clinical data, its role should be considered supportive rather than definitive. Based on our findings, it could serve as an early, cost-effective, and quick screening tool, helping physicians adopt a "think aorta" approach. (c) 2025 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 92
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Can ChatGPT 4.0 Diagnose Epilepsy? A Study on Artificial Intelligence's Diagnostic Capabilities
    Brigo, Francesco
    Broggi, Serena
    Leuci, Eleonora
    Turcato, Gianni
    Zaboli, Arian
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2025, 14 (02)
  • [2] Enhancements in artificial intelligence for medical examinations: A leap from ChatGPT 3.5 to ChatGPT 4.0 in the FRCS trauma & orthopaedics examination
    Khan, Akib Majed
    Sarraf, Khaled Maher
    Simpson, Ashley Iain
    SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2025, 23 (01): : 13 - 17
  • [3] Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT, Bing, and Medical Students in Germany
    Roos, Jonas
    Kasapovic, Adnan
    Jansen, Tom
    Kaczmarczyk, Robert
    JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2023, 9
  • [4] ChatGPT and the stochastic parrot: artificial intelligence in medical research
    Boussen, Salah
    Denis, Jean-Baptiste
    Simeone, Pierre
    Lagier, David
    Bruder, Nicolas
    Velly, Lionel
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 131 (04) : E120 - E121
  • [5] Performance of artificial intelligence on Turkish dental specialization exam: can ChatGPT-4.0 and gemini advanced achieve comparable results to humans?
    Sismanoglu, Soner
    Capan, Belen Sirinoglu
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [7] Integrating Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT into Higher Engineering Education
    Modran, Horia Alexandru
    Chamunorwa, Tinashe
    Ursutiu, Doru
    Samoila, Cornel
    TOWARDS A HYBRID, FLEXIBLE AND SOCIALLY ENGAGED HIGHER EDUCATION, VOL 1, ICL 2023, 2024, 899 : 499 - 510
  • [8] Generative artificial intelligence: Can ChatGPT write a quality abstract?
    Babl, Franz E.
    Babl, Maximilian P.
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2023, 35 (05) : 809 - 811
  • [9] Medical Student Experiences and Perceptions of ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence: Cross-Sectional Study
    Alkhaaldi, Saif M., I
    Kassab, Carl H.
    Dimassi, Zakia
    Alsoud, Leen Oyoun
    Al Fahim, Maha
    Al Hageh, Cynthia
    Ibrahim, Halah
    JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2023, 9
  • [10] ChatGPT in Radiology: The Advantages and Limitations of Artificial Intelligence for Medical Imaging Diagnosis
    Srivastav, Samriddhi
    Chandrakar, Rashi
    Gupta, Shalvi
    Babhulkar, Vaishnavi
    Agrawal, Sristy
    Jaiswal, Arpita
    Prasad, Roshan
    Wanjari, Mayur B.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (07)