Patient and Caregiver Perceptions of Caregiving Contributions During Cancer Clinical Trials: A Mixed-Methods Study

被引:0
作者
Cerutti, Janine [1 ,2 ]
Lent, Maria C. [1 ,2 ]
Holcombe, Randall F. [2 ]
Reblin, Maija [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vermont, Dept Psychol Sci, Burlington, VT USA
[2] Univ Vermont, Canc Ctr, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[3] Univ Vermont, Larner Coll Med, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2025年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
cancer; caregivers; clinical trial; mixed methods; oncology; qualitative research; rural;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.70488
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
ObjectiveCaregivers play crucial roles in cancer treatment and outcomes. However, little is known regarding how caregivers support patients during cancer clinical trials. The aim of this study was to gain insight into the caregiver experience of rural and urban patients enrolled in cancer clinical trials.MethodsAs part of a quality improvement study, 21 patient-caregiver dyads were interviewed using closed and open-ended interview questions. We analyzed quantitative and qualitative data on patient and caregiver perceptions of caregiver contributions and explored differences in the reported caregiving experience between rural and urban participants.ResultsWhile patient-caregiver dyads showed significant disagreement in the symptoms/medication management domain, with caregivers tending to acknowledge the contribution while patients did not (chi 2 (1, 21) = 5.82, p = 0.016), both groups generally showed agreement in their perceptions of caregiver involvement and reported similar levels of involvement across the other six assessed domains. Qualitative analysis revealed three themes: patient independence, invisible support, and accepted forms of support. Despite patients valuing independence, patients benefited from caregivers' unseen support, and providing emotional support and attending appointments were widely accepted forms of support among patients. No meaningful differences in caregiver contributions were found between rural and urban patient-caregiver dyads.ConclusionOur study revealed that caregivers are assisting patients in often unseen and underestimated ways during cancer clinical trials, highlighting their multifaceted role. Cancer clinical trials should implement a family-centered approach, especially for rural caregivers, to enhance patient retention and outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] A systematic review of interventions for family caregivers who care for patients with advanced cancer at home
    Ahn, Soojung
    Romo, Rafael D.
    Campbell, Cathy L.
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2020, 103 (08) : 1518 - 1530
  • [2] American Cancer Society, 2024, Caregiver Resource Guide,
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2023, Economic Research Service
  • [4] [Anonymous], Cancer facts figures
  • [5] Isolated, invisible, and in-need: There should be no "I" in caregiver
    Applebaum, Allison
    [J]. PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2015, 13 (03) : 415 - 416
  • [6] Rural-Urban Disparities in Cancer Outcomes: Opportunities for Future Research
    Bhatia, Smita
    Landier, Wendy
    Paskett, Electra D.
    Peters, Katherine B.
    Merrill, Janette K.
    Phillips, Jonathan
    Osarogiagbon, Raymond U.
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2022, 114 (07): : 940 - 952
  • [7] Financial and Health Barriers and Caregiving-Related Difficulties Among Rural and Urban Caregivers
    Bouldin, Erin D.
    Shaull, Lynn
    Andresen, Elena M.
    Edwards, Valerie J.
    McGuire, Lisa C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2018, 34 (03) : 263 - 274
  • [8] Informal caregivers' quality of life and management strategies following the transformation of their cancer caregiving role: A qualitative systematic review
    Cai, Yingying
    Simons, Alison
    Toland, Samantha
    Zhang, Junfeng
    Zheng, Kexin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING SCIENCES, 2021, 8 (02) : 227 - 236
  • [9] Expectations of care within marriage for older couples
    Cash, Belinda
    Warburton, Jeni
    Hodgkin, Suzanne
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2019, 38 (01) : E19 - E24
  • [10] Hope and meaning-making in phase 1 oncology trials: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence on patient-participant experiences
    Escritt, Kate
    Mann, Mala
    Nelson, Annmarie
    Harrop, Emily
    [J]. TRIALS, 2022, 23 (01)