Knowledge-Enhanced Transformer Graph Summarization (KETGS): Integrating Entity and Discourse Relations for Advanced Extractive Text Summarization

被引:1
作者
Onan, Aytug [1 ]
Alhumyani, Hesham [2 ]
机构
[1] Izmir Katip Celebi Univ, Fac Engn & Architecture, Dept Comp Engn, TR-35620 Izmir, Turkiye
[2] Taif Univ, Coll Comp & Informat Technol, Dept Comp Engn, POB 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
关键词
document summarization; extractive summarization; graph neural networks; text summarization; transformer models;
D O I
10.3390/math12233638
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
The rapid proliferation of textual data across multiple sectors demands more sophisticated and efficient techniques for summarizing extensive texts. Focusing on extractive text summarization, this approach zeroes in on choosing key sentences from a document, providing an essential method for handling extensive information. While conventional methods often miss capturing deep semantic links within texts, resulting in summaries that might lack cohesion and depth, this paper introduces a novel framework called Knowledge-Enhanced Transformer Graph Summary (KETGS). Leveraging the strengths of both transformer models and Graph Neural Networks, KETGS develops a detailed graph representation of documents, embedding linguistic units from words to key entities. This structured graph is then navigated via a Transformer-Guided Graph Neural Network (TG-GNN), dynamically enhancing node features with structural connections and transformer-driven attention mechanisms. The framework adopts a Maximum Marginal Relevance (MMR) strategy for selecting sentences. Our evaluations show that KETGS outshines other leading extractive summarization models, delivering summaries that are more relevant, cohesive, and concise, thus better preserving the essence and structure of the original texts.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Text summarization branches out
[2]  
Banerjee S., 2005, P ACL WORKSH INTR EX, V29, P65
[3]  
Beltagy I, 2020, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:2004.05150, 10.48550/arXiv.2004.05150]
[4]  
Carbonell J., 1998, Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, P335, DOI 10.1145/290941.291025
[5]  
Cohan A., 2018, NAACL, V2, P615, DOI 10.18653/v1
[6]  
Dai ZH, 2019, 57TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS (ACL 2019), P2978
[7]  
Devlin J, 2019, 2019 CONFERENCE OF THE NORTH AMERICAN CHAPTER OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS: HUMAN LANGUAGE TECHNOLOGIES (NAACL HLT 2019), VOL. 1, P4171
[8]  
Dong Y, 2019, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1809.09672
[9]   LexRank: Graph-based lexical centrality as salience in text summarization [J].
Erkan, G ;
Radev, DR .
JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 2004, 22 :457-479
[10]   Recent automatic text summarization techniques: a survey [J].
Gambhir, Mahak ;
Gupta, Vishal .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2017, 47 (01) :1-66