Valve-sparing aortic root replacement: Long-term variables significantly associated with mortality and morbidity

被引:5
作者
Sharma, Varun J. [1 ,2 ]
Kangarajah, Abbie [1 ]
Yang, Amy [1 ]
Kim, Michelle [1 ]
Seevayanagam, Siven [1 ,2 ]
Matalanis, George [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Austin Hlth, Brian F Buxton Dept Cardiac & Thorac Aort Surg, 145 Studley Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3084, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Med Sch, Dept Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
aortic surgery; valve-sparing root replacement;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.11.027
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: In aortic root surgery, valve-sparing aortic root replacement is an attractive alternative by mitigating the risks inherent to prosthetic valves; however, little is known about the variables that impact its durability. We review our mid- to long-term outcomes after valve-sparing aortic root replacement and describe factors that impact survival and valve reintervention and insufficiency. Methods: A retrospective review of 284 consecutive patients undergoing valve sparing aortic root replacement between November 1999 and January 2022 at Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia, was undertaken, with a median follow-up of 6.43 +/- 4.83 years, but up to 22.0 years. Freedom from mortality, aortic reintervention, and insufficiency was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods, Cox proportional hazard models, and Fine-Gray analysis. Results: The median age of patients at intervention was 60.0 years (interquartile range, 48.0-67.0), of whom 68 (23.9%) had bicuspid aortic valve disease, 27 (9.5%) had Marfan syndrome, 119 (41.9%) had severe aortic root dilation (>50 mm), and 155 had (54.6%) severe aortic insufficiency at the time of intervention. The 30-day mortality was 1.8%, with freedom from mortality of 96.0% (95% CI, 92.6-97.8) at 5 years and 88.2% (95% CI, 81.4-92.6) at 10 years. Freedom from aortic reintervention was 92.2% (95% CI, 87.7-95.2) at 5 years and 79.8% (95% CI, 71.8-85.8) at 10 years. Factors associated with reintervention were concomitant leaflet repair (hazard ratio, 8.13, 95% CI, 1.07-61.7) and bicuspid valvulopathy (hazard ratio, 2.23, 95% CI, 1.07-4.68), with reintervention in the bicuspid aortic valve being more likely due to aortic stenosis and in the tricuspid aortic valve due to aortic insufficiency (chi-square P = .05). The freedom from aortic insufficiency was 89.1% (95% CI, 83.5-92.9), 84.9% (95% CI, 77.8-89.9) at 5 and 10 years, respectively, and 80.7% (95% CI, 71.0-87.4). Conclusions: Valve-sparing aortic root replacement has excellent long-term outcomes, with low mortality and reintervention rates. Concomitant leaflet repair and bicuspid valve disease are the only long-term factors associated with reintervention. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2025;169:68-77)
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 77
页数:10
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
ANZSCTS, 2017, ANZSCTS Data Definitions Manual Version 4.1 2017
[2]   Long-term survival after composite mechanical aortic root replacement: A consecutive series of 448 cases [J].
Etz, Christian D. ;
von Aspern, Konstantin ;
Girrbach, Felix F. ;
Battellini, Roberto R. ;
Akhavuz, Oemuer ;
Leontyev, Sergey ;
Borger, Michael A. ;
Dohmen, Pascal M. ;
Mohr, Friedrich-Wilhelm .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 145 (03) :S41-S47
[3]   AORTIC ROOT REPLACEMENT - RISK FACTOR-ANALYSIS OF A 17-YEAR EXPERIENCE WITH 270 PATIENTS [J].
GOTT, VL ;
GILLINOV, AM ;
PYERITZ, RE ;
CAMERON, DE ;
REITZ, BA ;
GREENE, PS ;
STONE, CD ;
FERRIS, RL ;
ALEJO, DE ;
MCKUSICK, VA .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1995, 109 (03) :536-545
[4]   2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines [J].
Isselbacher, Eric M. ;
Preventza, Ourania ;
Hamilton Black, James ;
Augoustides, John G. ;
Beck, Adam W. ;
Bolen, Michael A. ;
Braverman, Alan C. ;
Bray, Bruce E. ;
Brown-Zimmerman, Maya M. ;
Chen, Edward P. ;
Collins, Tyrone J. ;
DeAnda, Abe ;
Fanola, Christina L. ;
Girardi, Leonard N. ;
Hicks, Caitlin W. ;
Hui, Dawn S. ;
Schuyler Jones, William ;
Kalahasti, Vidyasagar ;
Kim, Karen M. ;
Milewicz, Dianna M. ;
Oderich, Gustavo S. ;
Ogbechie, Laura ;
Promes, Susan B. ;
Gyang Ross, Elsie ;
Schermerhorn, Marc L. ;
Singleton Times, Sabrina ;
Tseng, Elaine E. ;
Wang, Grace J. ;
Woo, Y. Joseph .
CIRCULATION, 2022, 146 (24) :E334-E482
[5]   Early and long-term outcomes of conventional and valve-sparing aortic root replacement [J].
Jahangiri, Marjan ;
Mani, Krishna ;
Acharya, Metesh ;
Bilkhu, Rajdeep ;
Quinton, Paul ;
Schroeder, Frank ;
Morgan, Robert ;
Edsell, Mark .
HEART, 2022, 108 (23) :1858-1863
[6]   Valve-sparing aortic root replacement versus composite valve graft with bioprosthesis in patients under age 50 [J].
Levine, Dov ;
Patel, Parth ;
Zhao, Yanling ;
Chung, Megan ;
Singh, Sameer ;
Childress, Patra ;
Chodisetty, Shreya ;
Leshnower, Bradley ;
Kurlansky, Paul ;
Smith, Craig R. ;
Chen, Edward ;
Takayama, Hiroo .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 168 (04)
[7]  
Otto CM, 2021, CIRCULATION, V143, pe35, DOI 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000932
[8]   Valve-Sparing Root Replacement Compared With Composite Valve Graft Procedures in Patients With Aortic Root Dilation [J].
Ouzounian, Maral ;
Rao, Vivek ;
Manlhiot, Cedric ;
Abraham, Nachum ;
David, Carolyn ;
Feindel, Christopher M. ;
David, Tirone E. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 68 (17) :1838-1847