ESG Rating Disagreement, Financing Costs, and Enterprise Value

被引:1
作者
Ren, Mengxi [1 ]
Cao, Chenxi [2 ]
Shen, Zhenyi [3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
[2] Xian Jiaotong Liverpool Univ, Sch Math & Phys, Suzhou 215123, Peoples R China
[3] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Elect & Elect Engn, Singapore, Singapore
来源
EIGHTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, ICMSEM 2024 | 2024年 / 215卷
关键词
Information management; Finance; Costs; Investments; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; INFORMATION; DISCLOSURE;
D O I
10.1007/978-981-97-5098-6_69
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In the backdrop of escalating global issues such as climate change, social inequality, and governance risks, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors have garnered immense attention worldwide. The ESG rating, a crucial metric that assesses a company's sustainability performance, holds significant importance for investors, managers, and regulatory authorities. Drawing upon comprehensive data from Chinese listed companies between 2015 and 2022, this article delves deeper into the intricate relationship between ESG rating differences and corporate value. Our findings reveal that an increase in ESG rating disparities can lead to a decline in corporate value. This is primarily attributed to investors demanding higher returns to compensate for the potential risks associated with lower ESG ratings, ultimately resulting in increased financing costs for the companies. This research not only enhances investors' understanding of the impact of ESG ratings on corporate value but also provides managers with practical guidance on how to improve their ESG management practices. Additionally, it offers regulators valuable insights on leveraging ESG rating information for effective risk monitoring and regulation, thereby promoting sustainable business practices and contributing to a more resilient and sustainable future.
引用
收藏
页码:1019 / 1032
页数:14
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   The impact of social, environmental and corporate governance disclosures on firm value: Evidence from Egypt [J].
Aboud, Ahmed ;
Diab, Ahmed .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING IN EMERGING ECONOMIES, 2018, 8 (04) :442-458
[2]   ESG impact on performance of US S&P 500-listed firms [J].
Alareeni, Bahaaeddin Ahmed ;
Hamdan, Allam .
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2020, 20 (07) :1409-1428
[3]   Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty [J].
Avramov, Doron ;
Cheng, Si ;
Lioui, Abraham ;
Tarelli, Andrea .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 145 (02) :642-664
[4]  
Barako D G., 2006, Financial Reporting, Regulation and Governance, V5, P1
[5]   Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings* [J].
Berg, Florian ;
Kolbel, Julian F. ;
Rigobon, Roberto .
REVIEW OF FINANCE, 2022, 26 (06) :1315-1344
[6]   Inside the ESG ratings: (Dis)agreement and performance [J].
Billio, Monica ;
Costola, Michele ;
Hristova, Iva ;
Latino, Carmelo ;
Pelizzon, Loriana .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 28 (05) :1426-1445
[7]   Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers [J].
Chatterji, Aaron K. ;
Durand, Rodolphe ;
Levine, David I. ;
Touboul, Samuel .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 37 (08) :1597-1614
[8]  
Chen J., 2019, Does Public Disclosure Crowd Out Private Information Production?
[9]   Common institutional ownership and corporate social responsibility [J].
Cheng, Xin ;
Wang, He ;
Wang, Xianjue .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2022, 136
[10]  
Chiasson MW, 2005, MIS QUART, V29, P591