Comparison of Prognostic Values of Seven Immune Indexes in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Nivolumab: How Effective Can They Be Regarding Our Treatment Decisions?

被引:1
|
作者
Ulas, Arife [1 ]
Temel, Beyza [2 ]
Kos, Fahriye Tugba [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Sci, Bursa City Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, TR-16059 Bursa, Turkiye
[2] Univ Hlth Sci, Bursa City Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Internal Med, TR-16059 Bursa, Turkiye
[3] Univ Hlth Sci, Ankara City Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, TR-06290 Ankara, Turkiye
来源
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA | 2024年 / 60卷 / 11期
关键词
pan-immune inflammation value (PIV); systemic immune inflammation value (SII); neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR); platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR); monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR); derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (d-NLR); prognostic nutritional index (PNI); nivolumab; TO-LYMPHOCYTE RATIO; COLORECTAL-CANCER; DOCETAXEL; IMMUNOTHERAPY; INFLAMMATION; NEUTROPHILS; IMPACT; GROWTH; VEGF;
D O I
10.3390/medicina60111792
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: In this study, we evaluated the impact of seven immune indexes on treatment response and survival outcomes in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving second-line and subsequent nivolumab treatment under real-life conditions. Materials and Methods: The pan-immune inflammation value (PIV), systemic immune inflammation value (SII), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (d-NLR), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) were calculated. All immune indexes were classified as low and high based on cut-off values. Kaplan-Meier and Cox hazard models were used for survival analysis. Results: The median follow-up was 22.0 months (6.0-96.0). The median overall survival (OS) was 30.0 months and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.0 months. In the univariate analysis, comorbidity (p = 0.03) and nivolumab use for more than eight cycles (p < 0.0001) were associated with an increase in PFS, while smoking history (p < 0.005) and d-NLR (p < 0.05) were more effective regarding OS. Patients who received more than eight cycles of nivolumab had longer median PFS (4 vs. 19 months, p < 0.001) and OS (23 vs. 43 months, p < 0.001). We found longer median OS in the PLR (45.7 vs. 75.4 months; p = 0.05), PIV (53.0 vs. 66.4 months; p = 0.19), SII (50.0 vs. 71.9 vs. months, p = 0.19), and NLR (49.9 vs. 74.55 months, p = 0.10) indexes in nivolumab long-term users (high vs. low groups, respectively). In short-term users of nivolumab, only d-NLR median OS (high vs. low, 19 vs. 75.2 months, p = 0.07) was different. Complete and partial response rates to nivolumab treatment were higher in the PNI-high group (p = 0.04). Conclusions: In these real-life data, we determined that the PLR, PIV, SII, and NLR indexes were effective in the prognosis of patients who received PD1 inhibitor nivolumab for a long time, and the d-NLR index was effective in those who developed progression in a short time. We found that the PNI was effective in patients who responded well to ICI treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Immuno-oncological treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) in advanced stage with Nivolumab
    Venturella, Fabio
    Cancellieri, Giulia
    Giammanco, Marco
    Almerico, Anna Maria
    Aleo, Igor Daniele
    Liga, Anastasia Valentina
    Mortillaro, Francesca
    Mistretta, Irene
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH-BOLLETTINO DELLA SOCIETA ITALIANA DI BIOLOGIA SPERIMENTALE, 2023, 96 (01):
  • [32] Cost-effectiveness of second-line nivolumab for platinum-treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
    Zhang, Longfeng
    Zeng, Xiaofang
    Cai, Hongfu
    Li, Na
    Liu, Maobai
    Qiu, Lingling
    Zheng, Bin
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (18) : 1301 - 1309
  • [33] Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as an early marker of outcomes in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab
    Nakaya, Aya
    Kurata, Takayasu
    Yoshioka, Hiroshige
    Takeyasu, Yuki
    Niki, Maiko
    Kibata, Kayoko
    Satsutani, Naoko
    Ogata, Makoto
    Miyara, Takayuki
    Nomura, Shosaku
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 23 (04) : 634 - 640
  • [34] Bevacizumab for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
    Manegold, Christian
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2008, 8 (05) : 689 - 699
  • [35] Prognostic value of smoking status in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta-analysis
    Kim, Jung Han
    Kim, Hyeong Su
    Kim, Bum Jun
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (54) : 93149 - 93155
  • [36] Diffuse pseudoprogression in a patient with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer treated with Nivolumab
    Curioni-Fontecedro, A.
    Ickenberg, C.
    Franzen, D.
    Rogler, G.
    Burger, I. A.
    van den Broek, M.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28 (08) : 2040 - 2041
  • [37] Real-world Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab for Advanced Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis
    Kobayashi, Keigo
    Nakachi, Ichiro
    Naoki, Katsuhiko
    Satomi, Ryosuke
    Nakamura, Morio
    Inoue, Takashi
    Tateno, Hiroki
    Sakamaki, Fumio
    Sayama, Koichi
    Terashima, Takeshi
    Koh, Hidefumi
    Abe, Takayuki
    Nishino, Makoto
    Arai, Daisuke
    Yasuda, Hiroyuki
    Kawada, Ichiro
    Soejima, Kenzo
    Betsuyaku, Tomoko
    CLINICAL LUNG CANCER, 2018, 19 (03) : E349 - E358
  • [38] Are we ready for immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer?
    Mok, Tony S. K.
    Loong, Herbert H.
    LANCET, 2016, 387 (10027) : 1488 - 1490
  • [39] The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the rational choice
    Zouein, Joseph
    Haddad, Fady G.
    Eid, Roland
    Kourie, Hampig R.
    IMMUNOTHERAPY, 2022, 14 (02) : 155 - 167
  • [40] Docetaxel in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
    Saloustros, Emmanouel
    Georgoulias, Vassilis
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2008, 8 (08) : 1207 - 1222