共 50 条
Cost-effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors for second-line HR+/HER2-advanced or metastatic breast cancer in China
被引:0
作者:
Jia, Caifeng
[1
]
Zhang, Sen
[2
]
Wang, Jie
[3
]
Feng, Bing
[4
]
Shi, Fenghao
[5
,6
]
Wang, Meiqi
[7
]
Li, Sainan
[7
]
Xu, Hao
[8
]
Wang, Mingxia
[1
]
机构:
[1] Hebei Med Univ, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Hosp 4, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China
[2] Hebei Med Univ, Dept Pharm, Hosp 4, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China
[3] Hebei Med Univ, Dept Pharm, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China
[4] Hebei Med Univ, Dept Clin Pharm, Hosp 3, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China
[5] Peking Univ, Int Res Ctr Med Adm, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Peking Univ, Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[7] Hebei Med Univ, Dept Breast Ctr, Hosp 4, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China
[8] Hebei Med Univ, Dept Med Insurance, Hosp 4, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China
来源:
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
|
2025年
/
15卷
/
01期
关键词:
CDK4/6;
inhibitors;
Fulvestrant;
Cost-effectiveness;
HR-positive/HER2-negative;
Breast cancer;
China;
RIBOCICLIB PLUS FULVESTRANT;
POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN;
1ST-LINE TREATMENT;
ENDOCRINE THERAPY;
SURVIVAL;
CHEMOTHERAPY;
PALBOCICLIB;
D O I:
10.1038/s41598-025-97504-3
中图分类号:
O [数理科学和化学];
P [天文学、地球科学];
Q [生物科学];
N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号:
07 ;
0710 ;
09 ;
摘要:
Hormone receptor HR-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer is the most common subtype in China, representing 60-70% of cases, with a rising incidence due to aging demographics and lifestyle changes. CDK4/6 inhibitors such as palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib have been proven effective in treating HR+/HER2 - advanced or metastatic breast cancer (ABC/MBC), though they may increase healthcare costs. This study aims to compare the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors for the second-line treatment of HR+/HER2 - ABC/MBC from the Chinese healthcare perspective. A cohort-based partitioned survival model was utilized, drawing on the survival data published from PALOMA-3, MONALEESA-3 and MONARCH-2 trials. Costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were used to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) over a 15-year time horizon. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the model results. In the base-case analysis, the model estimated health benefits to be 2.10 QALYs for palbociclib plus fulvestrant (PAL + FUL), 2.55 QALYs for ribociclib plus fulvestrant (RIB + FUL), and 2.60 QALYs for abemaciclib plus fulvestrant (ABE + FUL), with corresponding costs of $34,423, $41,119, and $48,019. Compared with PAL + FUL, the ICERs were $27,161 per QALY for ABE + FUL and $15,073 per QALY for RIB + FUL. The robustness of these findings was confirmed through uncertainty analyses. Among the three strategies, the most cost-effective probabilities of PAL + FUL, RIB + FUL and ABE + FUL were 0%, 99.8%, and 0.2% under the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 3 times per-capita gross domestic product ($37,738) in China. This study indicated that both RIB + FUL and ABE + FUL are cost-effective at the WTP threshold compared with PAL + FUL. Notably, RIB + FUL offers the greatest cost-effective advantage for the second-line treatment of HR+/HER2 - ABC/MBC among these three CDK4/6 inhibitors.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文