Predicting schedule adherence of engineering changes - a case study on effectivity date adherence prediction using machine learning

被引:0
作者
Radisic-Aberger, Ognjen [1 ]
Burggraef, Peter [1 ]
Steinberg, Fabian [1 ]
Becher, Alexander [1 ]
Weisser, Tim [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Siegen, Chair Int Prod Engn & Management IPEM, Paul Bonatz Str 9-11, D-57076 Siegen, Germany
关键词
Artificial intelligence; engineering change; predictive business process monitoring; schedule adherence; machine learning; DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH; CHANGE PROPAGATION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2024.2432465
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Engineering changes (EC), redesigns of components, are common with complex products. Their realisation into production systems is a lengthy process and thorough control is imperative. As with most complex processes, however, this is a resource-intensive task and support is required to direct scarce resources. In other domains, predictive business process monitoring (PBPM) research has demonstrated that complex processes can be monitored using machine learning approaches. However, it is indicated that predictive performance is domain sensitive. Therefore, we investigate and show how PBPM can be applied to the EC process by predicting adherence to planned implementation dates. As the outcome of a case study comparing 30 predictive models, our research indicates that EC effectivity date adherence prediction, and thus pre-emptive EC schedule monitoring, is possible. However, performance comparison hints that shallow learning algorithms outperform deep learning algorithms. Furthermore, as the optimal algorithm depends on the deployment scenario, it is demonstrated how cost curves are better decision criteria for choosing models compared to threshold dependent metrics. Based on these findings, this article offers a blueprint for developing machine learning models for predicting the EC schedule adherence and lays the base for further research towards automatic EC scheduling and control.
引用
收藏
页码:3913 / 3937
页数:25
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Comparing classifiers when the misallocation costs are uncertain [J].
Adams, NM ;
Hand, DJ .
PATTERN RECOGNITION, 1999, 32 (07) :1139-1147
[2]   ENGINEERING CHANGE ADMINISTRATION - THE KEY ISSUES [J].
BALCERAK, KJ ;
DALE, BG .
COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 1992, 5 (02) :125-132
[3]   Engineering change: a theoretical assessment and a case study [J].
Barzizza, R ;
Caridi, M ;
Cigolini, R .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2001, 12 (07) :717-726
[4]  
Bergstra J, 2012, J MACH LEARN RES, V13, P281
[5]   The use of the area under the roc curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms [J].
Bradley, AP .
PATTERN RECOGNITION, 1997, 30 (07) :1145-1159
[6]   Concepts of change propagation analysis in engineering design [J].
Brahma, Arindam ;
Wynn, David C. .
RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2023, 34 (01) :117-151
[7]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[8]   AI-artifacts in engineering change management - a systematic literature review [J].
Burggraef, Peter ;
Wagner, Johannes ;
Sassmannshausen, Till ;
Weisser, Tim ;
Radisic-Aberger, Ognjen .
RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2024, 35 (02) :215-237
[9]   Deciding on when to change - a benchmark of metaheuristic algorithms for timing engineering changes [J].
Burggraef, Peter ;
Steinberg, Fabian ;
Weisser, Tim ;
Radisic-Aberger, Ognjen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2024, 62 (09) :3230-3250
[10]   Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Missing Components for Assembly - a Case Study at an Engineer-to-Order Manufacturer [J].
Burggraef, Peter ;
Wagner, Johannes ;
Heinbach, Benjamin ;
Steinberg, Fabian .
IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 :105926-105938