Amping up soil carbon: soil carbon stocks in California rangelands under adaptive multi-paddock and conventional grazing management

被引:0
作者
Stanley, Paige [1 ,2 ]
Roche, Leslie [3 ]
Bowles, Timothy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Dept Soil & Crop Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Plant Sci, Davis, CA USA
基金
美国农业部;
关键词
Adaptive multi-paddock grazing; California rangelands; soil carbon sequestration; soil organic matter fractions; plant community composition; grazing management; ORGANIC-MATTER FORMATION; AGRICULTURAL SOILS; PERENNIAL GRASSES; FORAGE PRODUCTION; GRASSLAND; IMPACTS; ROOT; SEQUESTRATION; PERSISTENCE; FRACTIONS;
D O I
10.1080/14735903.2025.2461826
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Adaptive multi-paddock (AMP) grazing is gaining attention for its potential to increase soil organic carbon (SOC), yet its efficacy on arid and semi-arid rangelands remains debated. Given the adaptive nature of AMP, on-ranch studies are essential for measuring its applied outcomes. To assess AMP's impact on Mediterranean California rangelands, we collected 1,440 soil samples from four paired AMP and conventional (CONV) grazing sites across northern California. Three AMP ranches had significantly greater SOC stocks in surface soils (17% greater SOC at 0-10 cm), and two had greater SOC stocks to 100 cm (32% greater), compared to CONV ranches. The largest SOC differences occurred in the mineral-associated organic matter fraction, suggesting longer-term SOC storage. While plant community composition did not differ significantly, AMP ranches, on average, had slightly less bare ground, greater live plant cover, and two sites had 82% greater perennial grass cover. These factors may have contributed to SOC differences. Further research is needed to understand site-specific constraints, underlying mechanisms, and SOC changes over time under AMP grazing.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 96 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2023, Global assessment of soil carbon in grasslands, DOI [10.4060/cc3981-n, DOI 10.4060/CC3981-N]
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2022, SOIL SURVEY GEOGRAPH
  • [3] Adaptive, Multipaddock Rotational Grazing Management: A Ranch-Scale Assessment of Effects on Vegetation and Livestock Performance in Semiarid Rangeland
    Augustine, David J.
    Derner, Justin D.
    Fernandez-Gimenez, Maria E.
    Porensky, Lauren M.
    Wilmer, Hailey
    Briske, David D.
    [J]. RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2020, 73 (06) : 796 - 810
  • [4] Cover crop root contributions to soil carbon in a no-till corn bioenergy cropping system
    Austin, Emily E.
    Wickings, Kyle
    McDaniel, Marshall D.
    Robertson, G. Philip
    Grandy, A. Stuart
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2017, 9 (07): : 1252 - 1263
  • [5] Bailey D.W., 2008, Resource Ecology: Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Foraging, P7, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-6850-8_2
  • [6] Barry S., 2020, California Native Grasslands Association, V91, P2404
  • [7] Response of a native perennial grass stand to disturbance in California's Coast Range Grassland
    Bartolome, JW
    Fehmi, JS
    Jackson, RD
    Allen-Diaz, B
    [J]. RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2004, 12 (02) : 279 - 289
  • [8] Bartolome JW., 1987, Rangelands, V9, P122
  • [9] 13C and 15N stabilization dynamics in soil organic matter fractions during needle and fine root decomposition
    Bird, Jeffrey A.
    Kleber, Markus
    Torn, Margaret S.
    [J]. ORGANIC GEOCHEMISTRY, 2008, 39 (04) : 465 - 477
  • [10] What can ecological science tell us about opportunities for carbon sequestration on arid rangelands in the United States?
    Booker, Kayje
    Huntsinger, Lynn
    Bartolome, James W.
    Sayre, Nathan F.
    Stewart, William
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2013, 23 (01): : 240 - 251