A Multimodal Deep Learning Nomogram for the Identification of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gray-Zone PSA Levels: Comparison with Clinical and Radiomics Models

被引:0
作者
Chen, Tong [1 ]
Hu, Wei [2 ]
Zhang, Yueyue [1 ]
Wei, Chaogang [1 ]
Zhao, Wenlu [1 ]
Shen, Xiaohong [1 ]
Zhang, Caiyuan [1 ]
Shen, Junkang [3 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Radiol, Suzhou 215000, Peoples R China
[2] Taihu Sanat Jiangsu Prov, Dept Radiol, Wuxi 214000, Peoples R China
[3] Soochow Univ, Inst Imaging Med, Suzhou 215000, Peoples R China
关键词
Deep learning; Radiomics; MRI; Prostate cancer; Gray zone; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; GUIDELINES; DIAGNOSIS; ANTIGEN; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2024.10.009
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: To establish a multimodal deep learning nomogram for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with gray-zone PSA levels. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 303 patients with pathological results between January 2018 and December 2022. Clinical variables and the PI-RADS v2.1 score were used to construct a clinical model. Radiomics and deep learning features from bp-MRI were used to develop a radiomics model with SVM and a deep learning model, respectively. A hybrid fusion approach was used to integrate the multimodal data and construct combined models (Comb.Rad.model and Comb.DL.model). The robustness of the radiomics model with XGBoost was validated and compared. Model efficacy was assessed through ROC curve and decision curve analysis. A nomogram was developed based on the best-performing model. Results: The clinical model had AUCs of 0.845 and 0.779 in the training and testing set. The radiomics model with SVM and the deep learning model achieved AUCs of 0.825 and 0.933 in the training set and 0.811 and 0.907 in the testing set, respectively. The diagnostic performance of the combined models was significantly improved, with Comb.DL.model having a higher AUC than Comb.Rad.model in both the training (0.986 vs. 0.924, P = 0.008) and testing (0.965 vs. 0.859, P = 0.005) set. The diagnostic efficiency of both the radiomics model and Comb.Rad.model with XGBoost were comparable to that of SVM, confirming the robustness of the established model. Conclusion: The integrated nomogram combining deep learning features, PI-RADS score, and clinical variables significantly outperformed the traditional radiomics and clinical models.
引用
收藏
页码:864 / 876
页数:13
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Siegel R.L., Giaquinto A.N., Jemal A., Cancer statistics, 2024, CA Cancer J Clin, 74, 1, pp. 12-49, (2024)
[2]  
Cornford P., Bellmunt J., Bolla M., Et al., EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II: treatment of relapsing, metastatic, and castration-resistant prostate cancer, Eur Urol, 71, 4, pp. 630-642, (2017)
[3]  
Catalona W.J., Smith D.S., Ratliff T.L., Et al., Measurement of prostate-specific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer, N Engl J Med, 324, 17, pp. 1156-1161, (1991)
[4]  
Chen R., Huang Y., Cai X., Et al., Age-specific cutoff value for the application of percent free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in Chinese men with serum PSA Levels of 4.0-10.0 ng/mL, PLoS One, 10, 6, (2015)
[5]  
Gershman B., Van Houten H.K., Herrin J., Et al., Impact of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening trials and revised PSA screening guidelines on rates of prostate biopsy and postbiopsy complications, Eur Urol, 71, 1, pp. 55-65, (2017)
[6]  
Bullock N., Simpkin A., Fowler S., Et al., Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer treated with surgery in the United Kingdom: trends and risk factors from the British Association of Urological Surgeons Radical Prostatectomy Registry, BMC Urology, 19, 1, (2019)
[7]  
Junker D., Steinkohl F., Fritz V., Et al., Comparison of multiparametric and biparametric MRI of the prostate: are gadolinium-based contrast agents needed for routine examinations?, World J Urol, 37, 4, pp. 691-699, (2019)
[8]  
Brembilla G., Giganti F., Sidhu H., Et al., Diagnostic Accuracy of Abbreviated Bi-Parametric MRI (a-bpMRI) for prostate cancer detection and screening: a multi-reader study, Diagnostics, 12, 2, (2022)
[9]  
Palumbo P., Manetta R., Izzo A., Et al., Biparametric (bp) and multiparametric (mp) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) approach to prostate cancer disease: a narrative review of current debate on dynamic contrast enhancement, Gland Surg, 9, 6, pp. 2235-2247, (2020)
[10]  
Girometti R., Giannarini G., Greco F., Et al., Interreader agreement of PI-RADS v. 2 in assessing prostate cancer with multiparametric MRI: a study using whole-mount histology as the standard of reference, J Magn Reson Imaging, 49, 2, pp. 546-555, (2019)