Applying health equity implementation science frameworks to population genetic screening

被引:0
作者
Rao, Nandana D. [1 ]
Fullerton, Stephanie M. [2 ]
Shirts, Brian H. [1 ,3 ]
Chen, Annie T. [4 ]
Henrikson, Nora B. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Inst Publ Hlth Genet, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Bioeth & Humanities, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Lab Med & Pathol, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Biomed Informat & Med Educ, Seattle, WA USA
[5] Kaiser Permanente Washington Hlth Res Inst, Kaiser Permanente Res Affiliates Evidence Based Pr, Seattle, WA USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES | 2024年 / 4卷
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
health equity; population genetic screening; implementation science; hereditary cancer; genetic testing; PUBLIC-HEALTH; CARE-SYSTEM; INTERVENTIONS; DISPARITIES; MEDICINE; MODEL;
D O I
10.3389/frhs.2024.1455365
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Implementation science frameworks with a focus on health equity have emerged to help guide the introduction of new interventions into healthcare and community settings while limiting health disparities. The purpose of this research was to explore the applicability of such frameworks to guide the equitable implementation of population genetic screening programs.Methods We searched PubMed and reference lists for relevant frameworks and examples of their use in health settings. We then assessed if and how selected frameworks provide guidance for different stages of population genetic screening: recruitment, sample collection, result return, follow-up care and long-term management, and cascade screening. Findings were synthesized into a list of health equity considerations specific to each stage.Results We identified 5 implementation frameworks that focus on health equity. Guidance varied by framework type: determinant (explaining what affects implementation outcomes), process (translating research into practice), or evaluation (assessing implementation). Common characteristics included focusing implementation efforts on populations who have historically experienced health inequities and adapting interventions to fit local contexts. Process models also highlighted the importance of community partnerships.Discussion Overall, frameworks offered broad recommendations applicable to population genetic screening program implementation. However, gaps still exist in guidance provided for later stages of population genetic screening. To improve the equitable implementation of genetic screening, future programs may benefit from utilizing one or more of these frameworks or by incorporating the health equity considerations and outcomes compiled in this analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Extending an Antiracism Lens to the Implementation of Precision Public Health Interventions
    Allen, Caitlin G.
    Olstad, Dana Lee
    Kahkoska, Anna R.
    Guan, Yue
    Ramos, Paula S.
    Steinberg, Julia
    Staras, Stephanie A. S.
    Lumpkins, Crystal Y.
    Milko, Laura, V
    Turbitt, Erin
    Rahm, Alanna K.
    Saylor, Katherine W.
    Best, Stephanie
    Hatch, Ashley
    Santangelo, Isabella
    Roberts, Megan C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 113 (11) : 1210 - 1218
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2022, What is health equity?
  • [3] Reframing implementation science to address inequities in healthcare delivery
    Baumann, Ana A.
    Cabassa, Leopoldo J.
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [4] What Are Health Disparities and Health Equity? We Need to Be Clear
    Braveman, Paula
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2014, 129 : 5 - 8
  • [5] A two-way street: bridging implementation science and cultural adaptations of mental health treatments
    Cabassa, Leopoldo J.
    Baumann, Ana A.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2013, 8
  • [6] Convergence of Implementation Science, Precision Medicine, and the Learning Health Care System A New Model for Biomedical Research
    Chambers, David A.
    Feero, W. Gregory
    Khoury, Muin J.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 315 (18): : 1941 - 1942
  • [7] Implementing Primary Care Mediated Population Genetic Screening Within an Integrated Health System
    David, Sean P.
    Dunnenberger, Henry M.
    Ali, Raabiah
    Matsil, Adam
    Lemke, Amy A.
    Singh, Lavisha
    Zimmer, Anjali
    Hulick, Peter J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2021, 34 (04) : 861 - 865
  • [8] Implementation of social needs screening in primary care: a qualitative study using the health equity implementation framework
    Drake, Connor
    Batchelder, Heather
    Lian, Tyler
    Cannady, Meagan
    Weinberger, Morris
    Eisenson, Howard
    Esmaili, Emily
    Lewinski, Allison
    Zullig, Leah L.
    Haley, Amber
    Edelman, David
    Shea, Christopher M.
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [9] A state-based approach to genomics for rare disease and population screening
    East, Kelly M.
    Kelley, Whitley V.
    Cannon, Ashley
    Cochran, Meagan E.
    Moss, Irene P.
    May, Thomas
    Nakano-Okuno, Mariko
    Sodeke, Stephen O.
    Edberg, Jeffrey C.
    Cimino, James J.
    Fouad, Mona
    Curry, William A.
    Hurst, Anna C. E.
    Bowling, Kevin M.
    Thompson, Michelle L.
    Bebin, E. Martina
    Johnson, Robert D.
    Acemgil, Aras
    Acemgil, Aras
    Crossman, David K.
    Finnila, Candice R.
    Gray, David E.
    Greve, Veronica
    Hardy, Sharonda
    Hiatt, Susan M.
    Latner, Donald R.
    Lawlor, James M. J.
    Miskell, Edrika L.
    Narmore, Whitney
    Schach, Julie H.
    Cooper, Gregory M.
    Might, Matthew
    Barsh, Gregory S.
    Korf, Bruce R.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 23 (04) : 777 - 781
  • [10] Conceptual framework of equity-focused implementation research for health programs (EquIR)
    Eslava-Schmalbach, J.
    Garzon-Orjuela, N.
    Elias, V.
    Reveiz, L.
    Tran, N.
    Langlois, E. V.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2019, 18 (1)