Do sanctions affect the environment? The role of trade integration

被引:5
作者
Khalid, Usman [1 ]
Ali, Muhammad Tahir [2 ]
Okafor, Luke [3 ]
Sanusi, Olajide Idris [4 ]
机构
[1] United Arab Emirates Univ, Coll Business & Econ, Dept Econ & Finance, Al Ain, U Arab Emirates
[2] Int Water Management Inst, Lahore, Pakistan
[3] Univ Nottingham, Sch Econ, Semenyih, Malaysia
[4] Univ Wisconsin Bay Area, Cofrin Sch Business, Dept Accounting & Finance, Green Bay, WI USA
来源
RESEARCH IN GLOBALIZATION | 2024年 / 8卷
关键词
Sanctions; Trade integration; Environmental quality; Gravity model; US ECONOMIC SANCTIONS; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; FOOD SECURITY; CO2; EMISSIONS; INTERNATIONAL SANCTIONS; SHADOW ECONOMY; IMPACT; QUALITY; CORRUPTION; FDI;
D O I
10.1016/j.resglo.2023.100191
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Environmental degradation is one of the potentially unforeseen consequences of sanctions, yet few studies have investigated how sanctions affect the environment. For instance, by restricting the acquisition of more efficient technologies, sanctions can strain natural resources and erode environmental performance. Therefore, this study investigates the moderating effects of trade integration on the underlying links between several types of sanctions (i.e., military, arms, trade, financial, and travel) and the environmental quality of the target country. A rich dyadic dataset consisting of 214 sender countries/states, 135 target countries/states, and 28,532 country pairs is used for the empirical analysis. A multi-way panel fixed effects model is employed for the empirical analysis. This approach allows us to control for the unobserved sender and target country-specific as well as time-specific characteristics that might affect environmental performance. The results show that most sanctions result in the deterioration of the environmental quality. In contrast, trade sanctions promote the environmental quality of the target country. We also find that sanctions adversely impact the ecological aspect of the environment while positively influencing the climate change aspect of environmental quality. The results also show that greater bilateral trade interdependence between the sender and the target country helps to mitigate the adverse impacts of most sanctions. The findings of this study suggest that the real effects of sanctions on environmental quality cannot be empirically disentangled if several types of sanctions are clubbed under the umbrella of 'sanctions' and captured using a single dummy variable, as is often done in the extant literature. Policies that encourage greater economic integration, such as trade liberalization with multiple countries, can be used strategically by a country to reduce threats of being sanctioned or vulnerabilities to the negative effects of sanctions on the environment.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Empirical Evidence of EU-Russia Bilateral Trade under Sanctions and Oil Price Shocks
    Garashchuk, Anna
    Isla-Castillo, Fernando
    Podadera Rivera, Pablo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (13)
  • [42] Do foreign direct investment inflows affect environmental degradation in BRICS nations?
    Pradhan, Ashis Kumar
    Sachan, Anshita
    Sahu, Udit Kumar
    Mohindra, Vinita
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (01) : 690 - 701
  • [43] How Do FDI and Technological Innovation Affect Carbon Emission Efficiency in China?
    Wang, Qizhen
    Liu, Suxia
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (23)
  • [44] Economic Sanctions and Trade Flows in the Neighborhood
    Bove, Vincenzo
    Di Salvatore, Jessica
    Nistico, Roberto
    JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2023, 66 (04) : 671 - 697
  • [45] Shadow Economy and Environmental Sustainability in Global Developing Countries: Do Governance Indicators Play a Role?
    Wang, Yi
    Antohi, Valentin Marian
    Fortea, Costinela
    Zlati, Monica Laura
    Mohammad, Reda Abdelfattah
    Abdelkhair, Farah Yasin Farah
    Ahmad, Waqar
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (22)
  • [46] Do financial inclusion, natural resources and urbanization affect the sustainable environment in emerging economies
    Bu, Fan
    wu, Hong
    Mahmoud, Haitham A.
    Alzoubi, Haitham M.
    Ramazanovna, Nargiza Kuzieva
    Gao, Yirui
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2023, 87
  • [47] Can green trade save the environment? Introducing the Green (Trade) Openness Index
    Can, Muhlis
    Ben Jebli, Mehdi
    Brusselaers, Jan
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (29) : 44091 - 44102
  • [48] Do BRICS Countries Have Similar Trade Integration Patterns?
    Rasoulinezhad, Ehsan
    Jabalameli, Farkhondeh
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION, 2018, 33 (01) : 1011 - 1045
  • [49] Symmetric and asymmetric analysis of trade and environment in Pakistan
    Khan, Azra
    Safdar, Sadia
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (05) : 11399 - 11416
  • [50] How does greening affect farm behaviour? Trade-off between commitments and sanctions in the Northern Italy
    Solazzo, Roberto
    Pierangeli, Fabio
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2016, 149 : 88 - 98