Ecosystem services and collective action: New commons, new governance challenges

被引:0
作者
Barnaud, Cecile [1 ]
Muradian, Roldan [2 ]
机构
[1] Toulouse Univ, INRAE, UMR Dynafor, F-31326 Castanet Tolosan, France
[2] Univ Fed Fluminense, Niteroi, Brazil
关键词
Ecosystem services; collective action; new commons; polycentric governance; nonutilitarian values; power relations; COMMUNITY-DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP; LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; ELITE CAPTURE; TRADE-OFFS; PAYMENTS; VALUES; CONSERVATION; INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101662
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This editorial article of the special issue "Ecosystem Services and Collective Action: New Commons, New Governance Challenges" examines the synergies and tensions between the ecosystem services (ES) framework and the theories on collective action for environmental governance. The literature and the contributions of this special issue illuminate the multifaceted nature of these interactions. By revealing new socio-ecological interdependencies and emerging commons, the ES concept raise opportunities of collective action and polycentric institutional arrangements, and can operate as a boundary object in collaborative processes. However, we also stress the importance of considering, in both research and policy design, the inherent challenges of collective ES governance regimes and the complexities of the underlying social processes, including: the rise of shared perceptions and common beliefs; the development of new social networks and trust relations; the recognition of multiple values and worldviews, notably non-utilitarian values; the management of conflicts and power asymmetries; and the context-dependency of institutional arrangements.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 171 条
  • [1] Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability
    Abson, D. J.
    von Wehrden, H.
    Baumgaertner, S.
    Fischer, J.
    Hanspach, J.
    Haerdtle, W.
    Heinrichs, H.
    Klein, A. M.
    Lang, D. J.
    Martens, P.
    Walmsley, D.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 103 : 29 - 37
  • [2] Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal
    Agrawal, A
    Ostrom, E
    [J]. POLITICS & SOCIETY, 2001, 29 (04) : 485 - 514
  • [3] Motivational Crowding in Payments for Ecosystem Service Schemes: a Global Systematic Review
    Akers, Jordan Frederick
    Yasue, Mai
    [J]. CONSERVATION & SOCIETY, 2019, 17 (04) : 377 - 389
  • [4] Allen A., 1998, HYPATIA, V13, P21, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1527-2001.1998.TB01350.X, 10.1111/j.15272001.1998.tb01350.x, DOI 10.1111/J.15272001.1998.TB01350.X]
  • [5] Collective action as a tool for agri-environmental policy implementation. The case of diffuse pollution control in European rural areas
    Amblard, Laurence
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 280
  • [6] Antona M., 2017, Une Troisieme Voie Entre L'etat et Le Marche: Echanges Avec Elinor Ostrom
  • [7] Ostrom, Hardin and the commons: A critical appreciation and a revisionist view
    Araral, Eduardo
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2014, 36 : 11 - 23
  • [8] NGOs, elite capture and community-driven development: perspectives in rural Mozambique
    Arnall, Alex
    Thomas, David S. G.
    Twyman, Chasca
    Liverman, Diana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MODERN AFRICAN STUDIES, 2013, 51 (02) : 305 - 330
  • [9] Linking landscape structure and ecosystem service flow
    Assis, Julia C.
    Hohlenwerger, Camila
    Metzger, Jean Paul
    Rhodes, Jonathan R.
    Duarte, Gabriela T.
    Silva, Rafaela A. da
    Boesing, Andrea Larissa
    Prist, Paula R.
    Ribeiro, Milton Cezar
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2023, 62
  • [10] Balvanera P, 2022, METHODOLOGICAL ASSES, DOI [10.5281/zenodo.6522522, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.6522522]