The Banning of Engineered Stone in Australia: An Evidence-Based and Precautionary Policy

被引:0
|
作者
Cavalin, Catherine [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Menendez-Navarro, Alfredo [4 ]
Lescoat, Alain [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Paris Cite Univ, Ctr Res Med Sci Hlth Mental Hlth Soc Cermes3, CNRS, EHESS,Inserm,U988,UMR8211, Paris, France
[2] Ctr Studies Employment & Labor CEET, Conservatoire Natl Arts & Metiers, St Denis, France
[3] Sciences Po, Interdisciplinary Lab Evaluat Publ Pol LIEPP, Paris, France
[4] Univ Granada, Dept Hist Sci, Granada, Spain
[5] Univ Rennes, Irset Inst Rech Sante Environm & Travail, CHU Rennes, Inserm,EHESP,UMRS, Rennes, France
[6] CHU Rennes, Dept Internal Med & Clin Immunol, Rennes, France
关键词
engineered stone; artificial stone; crystalline silica; silicosis; silica-related diseases; Australia; public health policy; precautionary policy; systemic autoimmune diseases; agnotology; AUTOIMMUNE-DISEASES; SILICA; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1177/27551938251314656
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
On December 13, 2023, Australia became the first country to ban engineered stone. This material contains more than 80 percent crystalline silica, agglomerated with resins, metal oxides and other (potentially toxic) substances. Engineered stone has become a mass-market product since the late 1990s and has contributed to a worldwide resurgence of accelerated forms of silicosis and a notable incidence of systemic diseases. Such a ban is a very rare event in a world where the regulatory framework governing the use of toxic substances in the workplace is generally limited to setting exposure limits. The Australian decision is exemplary in many respects: it is based on public consultation with all stakeholders, it contributes to updating biomedical knowledge that industries seek to conceal or undermine, and it is based on a realistic vision of real working conditions. In the absence of any evidence that lowering the silica content of this material would reduce occupational hazards related to toxic cocktail effects, this ban implements an evidence-based and precautionary public health policy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Evidence-based policy or risk minimisation? The regulation of e-cigarettes in Australia
    Newman, Joshua
    EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2019, 15 (02): : 313 - 328
  • [3] Sunscreens as a preventative measure in melanoma: an evidence-based approach or the precautionary principle?
    Diffey, B. L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2009, 161 : 25 - 27
  • [4] Policy makers as experts and teachers in need of reform: a critique of 'evidence-based' reforms of initial teacher education in Australia
    Deuchar, Andrew
    AUSTRALIAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2025, 52 (02) : 1163 - 1180
  • [5] Barriers to the evaluation of evidence-based public health policy
    Megan Freund
    Alison Zucca
    Robert Sanson-Fisher
    Andrew Milat
    Lisa Mackenzie
    Heidi Turon
    Journal of Public Health Policy, 2019, 40 : 114 - 125
  • [6] Barriers to the evaluation of evidence-based public health policy
    Freund, Megan
    Zucca, Alison
    Sanson-Fisher, Robert
    Milat, Andrew
    Mackenzie, Lisa
    Turon, Heidi
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY, 2019, 40 (01) : 114 - 125
  • [7] Illicit drugs, policing and the evidence-based policy paradigm
    Ritter, Alison
    Lancaster, Kari
    EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2013, 9 (04): : 457 - 472
  • [8] Attitudes of Psychologists in Australia towards evidence-based practice in psychology
    Hamill, Naomi Ruth
    Wiener, Karl Kilian Konrad
    AUSTRALIAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2018, 53 (06) : 477 - 485
  • [9] Changing clinical practice: evidence-based primary care in Australia
    Weller, D
    Veale, B
    HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 1999, 7 (05) : 324 - 332
  • [10] Urban Overheating and Cooling Potential in Australia: An Evidence-Based Review
    Yenneti, Komali
    Ding, Lan
    Prasad, Deo
    Ulpiani, Giulia
    Paolini, Riccardo
    Haddad, Shamila
    Santamouris, Mattheos
    CLIMATE, 2020, 8 (11) : 1 - 22