PrGChain: A privacy-preserving blockchain-enabled energy trading system

被引:0
作者
Berkani, Ahmed-Sami [1 ]
Moumen, Hamouma [1 ]
Benharzallah, Saber [1 ]
Kechadi, Mohand Tahar [2 ]
Bounceur, Ahcene [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Batna 2, Dept Comp Sci, LAMIE Lab, Batna 05078, Algeria
[2] Univ Coll Dublin, Insight Ctr Data Analyt, Sch Comp Sci, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Univ Sharjah, Informat Syst Dept, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Blockchain; Renewable energy; Oracles; Privacy; ZKP; Interoperability; Smart contracts; Stablecoins;
D O I
10.1016/j.compeleceng.2025.110289
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The integration of blockchain, Internet of Things devices, and distributed energy resources is revolutionizing peer-to-peer energy trading by enabling decentralized, efficient, and transparent transactions. However, existing solutions face challenges related to privacy, interoperability, and scalability. This paper presents PrGChain, a privacy-preserving blockchain-enabled energy trading framework within the smart grid, incorporating a decentralized ZKOracle to securely connect blockchain networks with off-chain energy data sources. The proposed ZKOracle employs zero-knowledge proofs to verify energy data without exposing sensitive information, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations, while leveraging a distributed network of oracle nodes for enhanced reliability and interoperability. To improve security and efficiency, PrGChain utilizes smart contracts, decentralized applications (dApps), and leverages stablecoins to mitigate cryptocurrency volatility. Performance evaluations demonstrate that our system achieves improved decentralization and privacy without sacrificing efficiency. This is particularly true when deployed on Layer 2 blockchain networks like Polygon, where transaction latency and costs are significantly reduced.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   An Architecture and Performance Evaluation of Blockchain-Based Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading [J].
Abdella, Juhar ;
Tari, Zahir ;
Anwar, Adnan ;
Mahmood, Abdun ;
Han, Fengling .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2021, 12 (04) :3364-3378
[2]  
Abrar I, 2024, Discover Internet of Things, V4, DOI [10.1007/s43926-024-00058-5, 10.1007/s43926-024-00058-5, DOI 10.1007/S43926-024-00058-5]
[3]   Trustworthy Blockchain Oracles: Review, Comparison, and Open Research Challenges [J].
Al-Breiki, Hamda ;
Rehman, Muhammad Habib Ur ;
Salah, Khaled ;
Svetinovic, Davor .
IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 :85675-85685
[4]   A systematic literature review of the tension between the GDPR and public blockchain systems [J].
Belen-Saglam, Rahime ;
Altuncu, Enes ;
Lu, Yang ;
Li, Shujun .
BLOCKCHAIN-RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 4 (02)
[5]  
Chen TM, 2023, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2202.06877
[6]  
Choobineh Moein, 2023, IET Blockchain, P35, DOI [10.1049/blc2.12020, 10.1049/blc2.12020]
[7]   EnergyAuction: IoT-Blockchain Architecture for Local Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading in a Microgrid [J].
Condon, Felipe ;
Franco, Patricia ;
Martinez, Jose M. ;
Eltamaly, Ali M. ;
Kim, Young-Chon ;
Ahmed, Mohamed A. .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (17)
[8]  
Deepa T., 2022, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, DOI [10.1088/1742-6596/2335/1/012059, 10.1088/1742-6596/2335/1/012059]
[9]   Leveraging zero knowledge proofs for blockchain-based identity sharing: A survey of advancements, challenges and opportunities [J].
Diro, Abebe ;
Zhou, Lu ;
Saini, Akanksha ;
Kaisar, Shahriar ;
Hiep, Pham Cong .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SECURITY AND APPLICATIONS, 2024, 80
[10]   A Survey about Consensus Algorithms Used in Blockchain [J].
Giang-Truong Nguyen ;
Kim, Kyungbaek .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS, 2018, 14 (01) :101-128