Virtual reality and augmented reality-supported K-12 STEM learning: trends, advantages and challenges

被引:1
作者
Jiang, Haozhe [1 ]
Zhu, Deqi [2 ]
Chugh, Ritesh [3 ,4 ]
Turnbull, Darren [3 ,4 ]
Jin, Wu [5 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Educ, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] UCL, UCL Inst Educ, London, England
[3] Cent Queensland Univ, Sch Engn & Technol, CML NET, Biloela, Qld, Australia
[4] Cent Queensland Univ, CREATE Res Ctr, Biloela, Qld, Australia
[5] East China Normal Univ, Sch Psychol & Cognit Sci, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Virtual reality; Augmented reality; STEM learning; K-12; Schools; Systematic review; ELEMENTARY-SCHOOL STUDENTS; JOURNAL PUBLICATIONS; SCIENCE; TECHNOLOGY; EDUCATION; INQUIRY; CONCEPTIONS; EXPERIENCES; ENGAGEMENT; WORLD;
D O I
10.1007/s10639-024-13210-z
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
As virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) continue to become popular, there remains a noticeable gap in understanding their potential for enriching science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning among K-12 students. To address this knowledge gap, this study systematically reviewed 117 articles published from 2010 to 2022 on the basis of the technology-based learning model. Following the PRISMA systematic review method, research methods, research participants, learning devices, learning strategies, advantages and challenges of each article were coded and analyzed. In the last six years (i.e., 2017-2022), the overall number of studies experienced rapid growth. The largest number of articles focused on VR/AR-supported K-12 science learning, followed by mathematics and integrated STEM learning. Smartphone/tablet-based AR was the most widely used technology, while very few studies used dedicated immersive AR devices. Most studies focused on the elementary school stage, while VR/AR-supported STEM learning at senior high schools was underexplored. Studies tended to measure the effectiveness of VR/AR by quantitative methods. Situated learning, task-based learning, and game-based learning were the most widely used learning strategies in VR/AR-supported K-12 STEM learning. The advantages of VR/AR in K-12 STEM learning include a positive impact on individual learners and on learning and teaching processes. In contrast, VR/AR also poses a series of challenges to learners, teachers, and schools. The challenges learners face include distractions, decreased efficiency and effectiveness, diminished inquiry and imagination, operational issues, and discomfort. Teachers encounter difficulties maintaining classroom control, designing activities, acquiring technical competence, and adapting to the new role of facilitating student-centered learning. Schools grapple with high costs, inadequate infrastructure, a lack of private virtual spaces, and privacy concerns. Based on our findings, we propose six research agendas to enrich studies on VR/AR-supported K-12 STEM learning, along with a series of significant implications for practitioners to effectively address the intricate challenges of VR/AR implementation and fully harness its potential.
引用
收藏
页数:37
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A systematic literature review of mixed reality environments in K-12 education
    Pellas, Nikolaos
    Kazanidis, Ioannis
    Palaigeorgiou, George
    EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 25 (04) : 2481 - 2520
  • [32] Combining Artificial Intelligence with Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in Education: Current Trends and Future Perspectives
    Lampropoulos, Georgios
    MULTIMODAL TECHNOLOGIES AND INTERACTION, 2025, 9 (02)
  • [33] Virtual and augmented reality effects on K-12, higher and tertiary education students' twenty-first century skills
    Papanastasiou, George
    Drigas, Athanasios
    Skianis, Charalabos
    Lytras, Miltiadis
    Papanastasiou, Effrosyni
    VIRTUAL REALITY, 2019, 23 (04) : 425 - 436
  • [34] A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF COLLABORATIVE LEARNING THROUGH VIRTUAL REALITY, AUGMENTED REALITY AND MIXED REALITY
    Andreu, Joel Manuel P. R. I. E. T. O.
    TEORIA DE LA EDUCACION, 2025, 37 (01): : 151 - 186
  • [35] A Systematic Review of Immersive Virtual Reality in STEM Education: Advantages and Disadvantages on Learning and User Experience
    Acevedo, Pedro
    Magana, Alejandra J.
    Benes, Bedrich
    Mousas, Christos
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 189359 - 189386
  • [36] Virtual and Augmented Reality in Science Teaching and Learning
    Tsichouridis, Charilaos
    Batsila, Marianthi
    Vavougios, Dennis
    Ioannidis, George
    IMPACT OF THE 4TH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION ON ENGINEERING EDUCATION, ICL2019, VOL 1, 2020, 1134 : 193 - 205
  • [37] Challenges of intracellular visualization using virtual and augmented reality
    Valades-Cruz, Cesar Augusto
    Leconte, Ludovic
    Fouche, Gwendal
    Blanc, Thomas
    Van Hille, Nathan
    Fournier, Kevin
    Laurent, Tao
    Gallean, Benjamin
    Deslandes, Francois
    Hajj, Bassam
    Faure, Emmanuel
    Argelaguet, Ferran
    Trubuil, Alain
    Isenberg, Tobias
    Masson, Jean-Baptiste
    Salamero, Jean
    Kervrann, Charles
    FRONTIERS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2022, 2
  • [38] Analyzing the potential of virtual reality-supported training for industrial assembly tasks
    Wolfartsberger, Josef
    Zimmermann, Robert
    Obermeier, Gabriele
    Niedermayr, Daniel
    COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2023, 147
  • [39] A meta-analytic review on incorporating virtual and augmented reality in museum learning
    Zhou, Yuting
    Chen, Juanjuan
    Wang, Minhong
    EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2022, 36
  • [40] Augmented Reality in K-12 Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature from 2000 to 2020
    Zhang, Jiakai
    Li, Gege
    Huang, Qinglin
    Feng, Qinna
    Luo, Heng
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (15)