Global trends and hotspots in robot-assisted arthroplasty: a CiteSpace-based bibliometric and visualized analysis

被引:0
作者
Xianfa Zhang [1 ]
Jing Wang [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Orthopedics, Wenshang People’s Hospital, Wenshang, Shandong, Ji’ning
关键词
Arthroplasty; Bibliometrics; CiteSpace; Robotic-assisted; Visual analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-025-02331-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
With the increasing integration of robotic technology into medical practice, robotic-assisted arthroplasty (RAA) has emerged as a significant research focus. This study employs CiteSpace, a bibliometric analysis tool, to systematically examine the current state and future directions of RAA research on a global scale. By retrieving relevant literature from the Web of Science Core Collection database spanning from 1997 to 2024, a total of 229 articles were identified for analysis. The findings indicate a steady rise in the number of publications within this field. China, the United States, and South Korea are the leading contributors, with the Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital being the most prolific institution. Keyword clustering analysis reveals that key research areas include total hip arthroplasty, Markov decision analysis, total knee arthroplasty, robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty, diverse assistive techniques, patient-reported outcome differences, robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty, and learning curves. Emerging trends are primarily centered around system development, navigation technologies, manual implantation methods, functional outcomes, and ossification processes. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2025.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Ma W., Chen H., Yuan Q., Et al., Global, regional, and national epidemiology of osteoarthritis in working-age individuals: insights from the global burden of disease study 1990–2021, Sci Rep, 15, (2025)
  • [2] Dubin J.A., Bains S.S., Hameed D., Et al., Projected volume of primary total joint arthroplasty in the USA from 2019 to 2060, Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 34, pp. 2663-2670, (2024)
  • [3] Sloan M., Premkumar A., Sheth N.P., Projected volume of primary total joint arthroplasty in the U.S., 2014 to 2030, J Bone Jt Surg, 100, pp. 1455-1460, (2018)
  • [4] Tokgoz E., Biomechanical success of traditional versus robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty, Total hip arthroplasty, pp. 199-210, (2023)
  • [5] Zheng W., Wu B., Cheng T., Adverse events related to robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study from the MAUDE database, Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 144, pp. 4151-4161, (2024)
  • [6] Khlopas A., Sodhi N., Sultan A.A., Et al., Robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty, 33, pp. 2002-2006, (2018)
  • [7] Chen X., Deng S., Sun M.-L., He R., Robotic arm-assisted arthroplasty: the latest developments, Chin J Traumatol, 25, pp. 125-131, (2022)
  • [8] Wang J.C., Piple A.S., Hill W.J., Et al., Computer-navigated and robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: increasing in popularity without increasing complications, J Arthroplasty, 37, pp. 2358-2364, (2022)
  • [9] Aggarwal V.A., Sun J., Sambandam S.N., Outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty, Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 144, pp. 2223-2227, (2024)
  • [10] Kim Y.-H., Yoon S.-H., Park J.-W., Does robotic-assisted TKA result in better outcome scores or long-term survivorship than conventional TKA? A randomized, controlled trial, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 478, pp. 266-275, (2020)