Comparison of Clinical Effects and Physical Examination of Transforaminal and Caudal Steroid Injection With Targeted Catheter in Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:0
|
作者
Imani, Farnad [1 ]
Mohammad-Esmaeel, Faezeh [1 ]
Morsalli, Seyedeh-Fatemeh [1 ]
Ahani-Azari, Ali [1 ]
Alimian, Mahzad [1 ]
Nikoubakht, Nasim [1 ]
Emami, Azadeh [1 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Med Sci, Pain Res Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Tehran, Iran
来源
BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR | 2024年 / 14卷 / 10期
关键词
caudal; epidural; lumbar radiculopathy; steroid; targeted catheter; transforaminal; DISC HERNIATION; EPIDURAL NEUROPLASTY; RADICULAR PAIN; INTERLAMINAR; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1002/brb3.70067
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background: Transforaminal and caudal epidural injections are two methods of steroid injection in lumbar radiculopathy. Using a targeted catheter with the possibility of accessing the involved spinal roots and steroid administration selectively next to them during the caudal procedure may achieve the benefits of both transforaminal and caudal procedures. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical effects and physical examinations of transforaminal steroid injection compared to caudal through a targeted catheter in lumbar radiculopathy. Methods: Fifty patients with lumbar radiculopathy candidates for epidural steroid injection were divided into transforaminal (T) and caudal (C) groups. Steroid injection under fluoroscopic guidance was performed in group T with the transforaminal method and in group C with the caudal method using a targeted catheter for each involved spinal nerve root. Pain intensity visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), daily analgesic consumption, and physical examinations on four follow-ups (before injection, second week, first and third month) were evaluated. Results: Pain score (VAS) and functional disability index (ODI) were similar in both groups, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). The positive Las & egrave;gue test was significantly higher in the caudal group than in the transforaminal group only in the third month (p < 0.05). Other physical examinations in both groups did not have significant differences in all the follow-ups. Moreover, there was no difference in the amount of analgesic consumption in the two groups. No complications were observed in both groups. Conclusion: This study showed that transforaminal and caudal steroid injection (with a targeted catheter) in patients with lumbar radiculopathy had similar effects in controlling pain and improving functional disability of patients in the short term. Cases of recurrence of positive Las & egrave;gue test in physical examinations in the long term (third month) in the caudal group may indicate the preference of the transforaminal approach.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparing the Effects of an Herbal Ointment (Based on Persian Medicine) and Silver Sulfadiazine Ointment on the Second-Degree Burn Wounds: a Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
    Alizadeh, Mehdi
    Dahmardehei, Mostafa
    Fahimi, Shirin
    Sadeghi, Sajjad
    Mokaberinejad, Roshanak
    RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOGNOSY, 2020, 7 (04) : 11 - 22
  • [42] Effect of botulinum toxin A on pain, bite force, and satisfaction of patients with bruxism: A randomized single-blind clinical trial comparing two protocols
    Ramalho, Juliana Alves da Silva
    Palma, Luiz Felipe
    Ramalho, Karen Muller
    Tedesco, Tamara Kerber
    Morimoto, Susana
    SAUDI DENTAL JOURNAL, 2023, 35 (01) : 53 - 60
  • [43] A Randomized Controlled Single-Blind Clinical Trial on 84 Outpatients with Psoriasis Vulgaris by Auricular Therapy Combined with Optimized Yinxieling Formula (sic)
    Lu Chuan-jian
    Xiang Yu
    Xuan Mei-ling
    He Ze-hui
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 18 (03) : 186 - 191
  • [44] Comparison of effects of low-level laser therapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy in plantar fasciitis treatment: A randomized, prospective, single-blind clinical study
    Sanmak, Omur Damla Yinilmez
    Kulcu, Duygu Geler
    Mesci, Nilgun
    Altunok, Elif Cigdem
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2019, 65 (02): : 184 - 190
  • [45] Comparison Between Two Interproximal Cleaning Procedures in Periodontitis Patients: A Six-month, Single-blind, Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial
    Schmidt, Bastian
    Jentsch, Holger
    ORAL HEALTH & PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY, 2015, 13 (03) : 205 - 211
  • [46] Comparison of the Analgesic Effects of Dexketoprofen and Diclofenac During Shockwave Lithotripsy: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
    Tokgoz, Husnu
    Yurtlu, Serhan
    Hanci, Volkan
    Turksoy, Ozlem
    Erol, Bulent
    Akduman, Bulent
    Mungan, Aydin
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 (06) : 1031 - 1035
  • [48] The effect of abdominal massage and stretching exercise on pain and dysmenorrhea symptoms in female university students: A single-blind randomized-controlled clinical trial
    Ozturk, Nazan
    Oter, Emine Gercek
    Eke, Meryem Kurek
    HEALTH CARE FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 44 (05) : 621 - 638
  • [49] Low-Load Resistance Training With Blood Flow Restriction Improves Clinical Outcomes in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ladlow, Peter
    Coppack, Russell J.
    Dharm-Datta, Shreshth
    Conway, Dean
    Sellon, Edward
    Patterson, Stephen D.
    Bennett, Alexander N.
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [50] Xiaoketongbi Formula vs pregabalin for painful diabetic neuropathy: A single-center, randomized, single-blind, double-dummy, and parallel controlled clinical trial
    Lu, Qiyun
    Chen, Benjian
    Liang, Qingshun
    Wu, Liyan
    Luo, Lulu
    Li, Anxiang
    Ouyang, Wenwei
    Wen, Zehuai
    Liu, Yunwei
    Lu, Jiayan
    Liu, Yunyi
    Fan, Guanjie
    Liu, Zhenjie
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2022, 14 (08) : 551 - 561