Comparison of Clinical Effects and Physical Examination of Transforaminal and Caudal Steroid Injection With Targeted Catheter in Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:0
|
作者
Imani, Farnad [1 ]
Mohammad-Esmaeel, Faezeh [1 ]
Morsalli, Seyedeh-Fatemeh [1 ]
Ahani-Azari, Ali [1 ]
Alimian, Mahzad [1 ]
Nikoubakht, Nasim [1 ]
Emami, Azadeh [1 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Med Sci, Pain Res Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Tehran, Iran
来源
BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR | 2024年 / 14卷 / 10期
关键词
caudal; epidural; lumbar radiculopathy; steroid; targeted catheter; transforaminal; DISC HERNIATION; EPIDURAL NEUROPLASTY; RADICULAR PAIN; INTERLAMINAR; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1002/brb3.70067
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background: Transforaminal and caudal epidural injections are two methods of steroid injection in lumbar radiculopathy. Using a targeted catheter with the possibility of accessing the involved spinal roots and steroid administration selectively next to them during the caudal procedure may achieve the benefits of both transforaminal and caudal procedures. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical effects and physical examinations of transforaminal steroid injection compared to caudal through a targeted catheter in lumbar radiculopathy. Methods: Fifty patients with lumbar radiculopathy candidates for epidural steroid injection were divided into transforaminal (T) and caudal (C) groups. Steroid injection under fluoroscopic guidance was performed in group T with the transforaminal method and in group C with the caudal method using a targeted catheter for each involved spinal nerve root. Pain intensity visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), daily analgesic consumption, and physical examinations on four follow-ups (before injection, second week, first and third month) were evaluated. Results: Pain score (VAS) and functional disability index (ODI) were similar in both groups, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). The positive Las & egrave;gue test was significantly higher in the caudal group than in the transforaminal group only in the third month (p < 0.05). Other physical examinations in both groups did not have significant differences in all the follow-ups. Moreover, there was no difference in the amount of analgesic consumption in the two groups. No complications were observed in both groups. Conclusion: This study showed that transforaminal and caudal steroid injection (with a targeted catheter) in patients with lumbar radiculopathy had similar effects in controlling pain and improving functional disability of patients in the short term. Cases of recurrence of positive Las & egrave;gue test in physical examinations in the long term (third month) in the caudal group may indicate the preference of the transforaminal approach.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical value of transforaminal epidural steroid injection in lumbar radiculopathy
    Leung, S. M.
    Chau, W. W.
    Law, S. W.
    Fung, K. Y.
    HONG KONG MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 21 (05) : 394 - 400
  • [2] Comparison of clinical efficacy of transforaminal and caudal epidural steroid injection in lumbar and lumbosacral disc herniation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lee, Jung Hwan
    Shin, Kyoung-hHo
    Bahk, Sung Jin
    Lee, Goo Joo
    Kim, Dong Hwan
    Lee, Chang-Hyung
    Kim, Du Hwan
    Yang, Hee Seung
    Lee, Sang-Ho
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 18 (12): : 2343 - 2353
  • [3] Comparison of Caudal Versus Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection in Post Lumbar Surgery Syndrome After Single-level Discectomy: A Prospective, Randomized Trial
    Celenlioglu, Alp Eren
    Sencan, Savas
    Bilim, Serhad
    Sancar, Mert
    Gunduz, Osman Hakan
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2022, 25 (02) : 161 - 169
  • [4] Caudal epidural steroid injection versus transforaminal ESI for unilateral S1 radiculopathy: a prospective, randomized trial
    Ozturk, Ekim Can
    Sacaklidir, Rekib
    Sencan, Savas
    Gunduz, Osman Hakan
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2023, 24 (08) : 957 - 962
  • [5] Contrast Dispersal Patterns as a Predictor of Clinical Outcome With Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection for Lumbar Radiculopathy
    Paidin, Mark
    Hansen, Pamela
    McFadden, Molly
    Kendall, Richard
    PM&R, 2011, 3 (11) : 1022 - 1027
  • [6] Reducing Radiation Exposure in Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections with Pulsed Fluoroscopy: A Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Clinical Trial
    Braun, Edward
    Sack, Andrew M.
    Sayed, Dawood
    Manion, Smith
    Hamm, Brian
    Brimacombe, Michael
    Tollette, Michael
    Khan, Talal W.
    Orr, Walter
    Nicol, Andrea
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2018, 21 (01) : 53 - 60
  • [7] Dexmedetomidine versus hyaluronidase along with lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection in failed back surgery: a randomized double-blind clinical trial
    Raouf, Mina Maher
    Kyriacos, Sherry Shehata
    Hassanein, Manal
    Salem, Gehan Ibrahim Abdel-Razek
    Elsonbaty, Amira
    Sadik, Sadik Abdel-Maseeh
    Awad, Mohammad
    ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2025, 20 (01): : 61 - 71
  • [8] Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection Improves Neuropathic Pain in Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Prospective, Clinical Study
    Sencan, Savas
    Celenlioglu, Alp Eren
    Yazici, Gonca
    Gunduz, Osman Hakan
    NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2021, 69 (04) : 910 - 915
  • [9] Ultrasound-Guided vs. Fluoroscopy-Guided Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Unilateral Lower Lumbar Radicular Pain A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blind Clinical Study
    Park, Yongbum
    Lee, Ji-Hae
    Park, Ki Deok
    Ahn, Jae Ki
    Park, Jaehyun
    Jee, Haemi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2013, 92 (07) : 575 - 586
  • [10] Intraoperative Results and Postoperative Clinical Outcomes of Lumbar Microdiscectomy in Patients who Previously Received a Transforaminal Anterior Epidural Steroid Injection for Lumbar Radiculopathy
    Ozturk, Sait
    Akgun, Bekir
    Erol, Fatih Serhat
    Onal, Selami Ates
    Kaplan, Metin
    TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 28 (02) : 263 - 269