Mining space and sustainability: A systematic review

被引:1
作者
Butters, Leanna [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Univ, Grenfell Campus,20 Univ Dr, Corner Brook, NF A2H 5G5, Canada
关键词
Mining; Social space; Sustainability; EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES; POLITICS; PLACE; CHALLENGES; SECTOR; SCALE; LAND; DISPOSSESSION; MATERIALITY; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.exis.2025.101623
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Mining operations present social, economic, and environmental benefits and challenges, many of which are context specific. While social approaches and spatial approaches have been used to study mining impacts for decades, approaches that consider social and spatial dimensions in tandem are growing. This is timely from a sustainability perspective given the need for integrated research approaches that can uncover the nature of complex mining-related challenges and deliver effective solutions. This paper presents findings from a systematic literature review. It documents concepts and methods used to frame and investigate social space to date within mining contexts and considers how these link to sustainability. This study finds that social spatial research on mining is framed primarily by socio-spatial, socio-ecological, and materialist perspectives. Authors mainly rely on traditional methodologies and methods, especially ethnography. Social spatial research appears to be wellsuited to the study of diverse relational dynamics in the context of mining and sustainability. However, while existing research has contributed to much new knowledge about complex sustainability problems (systems knowledge) and values that ought to change (target knowledge), fewer papers consider strategies for addressing these problems (transformation knowledge). Future research might adopt co-productive and/or transdisciplinary approaches to develop new, innovative research methods and meaningful solutions to sustainability challenges.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 107 条
[41]  
Himley M., 2016, Mining in Latin America
[42]   Mobilising subterranean geopolitics: The spectre of spontaneous combustion and post mining imaginaries [J].
Hine, Amelia ;
Mayes, Robyn .
GEOFORUM, 2022, 130 :1-10
[43]   Wasteland Ecologies: Undomestication and Multispecies Gains on an Anthropocene Dumping Ground [J].
Hoag, Colin ;
Bertoni, Filippo ;
Bubandt, Nils .
JOURNAL OF ETHNOBIOLOGY, 2018, 38 (01) :88-104
[45]  
Hubbard P., 2002, Thinking Geographically: Space, Theory, and Contemporary Geography
[46]  
Irrazaval F., 2022, Resour. Policy., V78
[47]  
Is in, 2015, P 24 INT MIN C EXH T
[48]   Utilization of research knowledge in sustainable development pathways: Insights from a transdisciplinary research-for-development programme [J].
Jacobi, J. ;
Llanque, A. ;
Bieri, S. ;
Birachi, E. ;
Cochard, R. ;
Chauvin, N. Depetris ;
Diebold, C. ;
Eschen, R. ;
Frossard, E. ;
Guillaume, T. ;
Jaquet, S. ;
Kaempfen, F. ;
Kenis, M. ;
Kiba, D., I ;
Komarudin, H. ;
Madrazo, J. ;
Manoli, G. ;
Mukhovi, S. M. ;
Nguyen, V. T. H. ;
Pomalegni, C. ;
Rueegger, S. ;
Schneider, F. ;
TriDung, N. ;
von Groote, P. ;
Winkler, M. S. ;
Zaehringer, J. G. ;
Robledo-Abad, C. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2020, 103 :21-29
[49]   Temporal enclosures and the social production of inescapable futures for coal mining in Colombia [J].
Jaramillo, Pablo ;
Carmona, Susana .
GEOFORUM, 2022, 130 :11-22
[50]   Social sciences and the mining sector: Some insights into recent research trends [J].
Karakaya, Emrah ;
Nuur, Cali .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2018, 58 :257-267