Improving breast ultrasonography education: the impact of AI-based decision support on the performance of non-specialist medical professionals

被引:0
|
作者
Lee, Sangwon [1 ]
Lee, Hye Sun [2 ]
Lee, Eunju [2 ]
Kim, Won Hwa [3 ,4 ]
Kim, Jaeil [4 ,5 ]
Yoon, Jung Hyun [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Severance Hosp, Res Inst Radiol Sci, Dept Radiol,Coll Med, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Biostat Collaborat Unit, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Chilgok Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Daegu, South Korea
[4] BeamWorks Inc, Daegu, South Korea
[5] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Daegu, South Korea
关键词
Breast; Ultrasound; Breast neoplasms; Artificial intelligence; Education; BI-RADS; ULTRASOUND; AGREEMENT; VARIABILITY; EDITION;
D O I
10.14366/usg.24171
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study evaluated the educational impact of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based decision support system for breast ultrasonography (US) on medical professionals not specialized in breast imaging. Methods: In this multi-case, multi-reader study, educational materials, including American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) descriptors, were provided alongside corresponding AI results during training. The AI system presented results in the form ofAI- heatmaps, AI scores, and AI-provided BI-RADS assessment categories. Forty-two readers evaluated the test set in three sessions: the first session (S1) occurred before the educational intervention, the second session (S2) followed education without AI assistance, and the third session (S3) took place after education with AI assistance. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and overall performance, were compared between the sessions. Results: The mean sensitivity increased from 66.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59.2% to 73.7%) to 88.7% (95% CI, 84.1% to 93.3%), with a statistically significant difference (P<0.001), and the AUC non-significantly increased from 0.664 (95% CI, 0.606 to 0.723) to 0.684 (95% CI, 0.620 to 0.748) (P=0.300). Both measures were higher in S2 than in S1. The AI-achieved AUC was comparable to that of the expert reader (0.747 [95% CI, 0.640 to 0.855] vs. 0.803 [95% CI, 0.706 to 0.900], P=0.217). Additionally, with AI assistance, the mean AUC for inexperienced readers was not significantly different from that of the expert reader (0.745 [95% CI, 0.660 to 0.830] vs. 0.803 [95% CI, 0.706 to 0.900], P=0.120). Conclusion: The mean AUC and sensitivity improved after incorporating AI into breast US education and interpretation. AI systems with high-level performance for breast US can potentially be used as educational tools in the interpretation of breast US images.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 133
页数:10
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Improving breast ultrasonography education: the impact of AI-based decision support on the performance of nonspecialist medical professionals
    Lee, Sangwon
    Lee, Hye Sun
    Lee, Eunju
    Kim, Won Hwa
    Kim, Jaeil
    Yoon, Jung Hyun
    ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2024,
  • [2] The impact of AI-based decision support systems on nursing workflows in critical care units
    Almagharbeh, Wesam Taher
    INTERNATIONAL NURSING REVIEW, 2024,
  • [3] The Impact of Training Data Shortfalls on Safety of AI-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems
    Conmy, Philippa Ryan
    Ozturk, Berk
    Lawton, Tom
    Habli, Ibrahim
    COMPUTER SAFETY, RELIABILITY, AND SECURITY, SAFECOMP 2023, 2023, 14181 : 213 - 226
  • [4] Investigating AI-based academic support acceptance and its impact on students' performance in Malaysian and Pakistani higher education institutions
    Dahri, Nisar Ahmed
    Yahaya, Noraffandy
    Al-Rahmi, Waleed Mugahed
    Vighio, Muhammad Saleem
    Alblehai, Fahad
    Soomro, Rahim Bux
    Shutaleva, Anna
    EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 29 (14) : 18695 - 18744
  • [5] Radiomics and AI-based treatment decision support for non-small cell lung cancer
    Mu, Wei
    Jiang, Lei
    Zhang, Jianyuan
    Shi, Yu
    Gray, Jhanelle E.
    Zhao, Xinming
    Sun, Xilin
    Tian, Jie
    Schabath, Matthew B.
    Gillies, Robert J.
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 27 (05)
  • [6] Ethical, legal, and social considerations of AI-based medical decision-support tools: A scoping review
    Cartolovni, Anto
    Tomicic, Ana
    Mosler, Elvira Lazic
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 161
  • [7] In the AI of the Beholder-A Qualitative Study of HR Professionals' Beliefs about AI-Based Chatbots and Decision Support in Candidate Pre-Selection
    Malin, Christine
    Kupfer, Cordula
    Fleiss, Jurgen
    Kubicek, Bettina
    Thalmann, Stefan
    ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2023, 13 (11)
  • [8] Understanding the impact of explanations on advice-taking: a user study for AI-based clinical Decision Support Systems
    Panigutti, Cecilia
    Beretta, Andrea
    Pedreschi, Dino
    Giannotti, Fosca
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI' 22), 2022,
  • [9] Factors influencing the implementation of AI-based decision support systems for antibiotic prescription in hospitals: a qualitative analysis from the perspective of health professionals
    Tokgoez, Pinar
    Hafner, Jessica
    Dockweiler, Christoph
    GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2023, 85 (12) : 1220 - 1228
  • [10] Healthcare professionals satisfaction and AI-based clinical decision support system in public sector hospitals during health crises: a cross-sectional study
    Ahmad, Nisar
    Du, Shaofu
    Ahmed, Fawad
    ul Amin, Noor
    Yi, Xu
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2023,