A comparative study on material removal rate and surface roughness during electrochemical machining of 100Cr6 steel in oxidizing and reducing electrolytic environments

被引:2
作者
Upadhyay, Ritesh Kumar [1 ]
Majhi, Shyam Sundar [2 ]
Mahapatra, Susanta Sinha [3 ]
Yadav, Narendra [4 ]
Chakraborty, Ashis Kumar [1 ]
Singh, Ashish Chandra [2 ]
Kumar, Bishnu [5 ]
机构
[1] BIT Mesra Extens Ctr Deoghar, Dept Mech Engn, Deoghar, Jharkhand, India
[2] BIT Mesra Extens Ctr Deoghar, Dept Chem, Deoghar, Jharkhand, India
[3] BIT Mesra, Dept Chem, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
[4] Birla Inst Technol Mesra Ranchi, Cent Instrumentat Facil, Mesra, Jharkhand, India
[5] BIT Mesra Extens Ctr Deoghar, Dept Math, Deoghar, Jharkhand, India
关键词
Electrochemical machining; 100Cr6; steel; anodic dissolution; electrochemical analysis; aqueous NaCl; K2Cr2O7; CuSO4; surface roughness; MRR; 20MNCR5; ALLOY-STEEL; ANODIC-DISSOLUTION; INCONEL; 718; IRON; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; CORROSION;
D O I
10.1177/09544089251316751
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Electrochemical machining is a promising technique for creating microtextured surfaces on engineering materials due to its advantages, including a high material removal rate and superior surface finish. Electrochemical machining, however, faces challenges that hinder its precision, primarily due to the formation of a passive oxide layer on the workpiece surface. This oxide layer negatively affects both material removal rate and surface roughness (Ra), complicating the machining process. High current densities (> 20 A/cm(2)) can improve material removal rate, but they also increase energy consumption and worsen surface finish quality due to the intensified oxide layer formation. This dynamic creates a trade-off between increased material removal and a deteriorated surface finish. The article investigates ways to overcome these limitations by selecting appropriate electrolytic environments for the process. The study focuses on the anodic dissolution behavior of 100Cr6 steel in two distinct electrolytic solutions. The first is an oxidizing electrolyte, consisting of potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7) and sodium chloride (NaCl), which promotes oxidation. The second is a reducing electrolyte, containing copper sulfate (CuSO4) and NaCl, which affects the electrochemical dissolution process differently by reducing the steel surface. The maximum improvement in material removal rate with the oxidizing electrolyte is observed at 22%, but simultaneously, a reduction in surface finish quality by 16.4% is noted. The reducing electrolyte offers much better overall performance, with significant improvements in both material removal rate (48.5%) and surface finish quality (21.7%). This is attributed to the reduction in oxide layer formation, which allows for a more controlled and efficient machining process. Analytical techniques like cyclic voltammetry (CV), UV-visible spectrophotometry, and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) were employed to analyze the dissolution process and visualize surface changes after machining. The results show that the oxidizing environment exposes more metal surfaces than the reducing environment, which aids in understanding and optimizing electrochemical machining processes.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Abbott AP., 2015, Prog Natural Sci Mater Int, V25
[2]   Enhancing the performance of electrochemical machining of 20MnCr5 alloy steel and optimization of process parameters by PSO-DF optimizer [J].
Ayyappan, S. ;
Sivakumar, K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 82 (9-12) :2053-2064
[3]   Experimental investigation on the performance improvement of electrochemical machining process using oxygen-enriched electrolyte [J].
Ayyappan, S. ;
Sivakumar, K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 75 (1-4) :479-487
[4]   Investigation of electrochemical machining characteristics of 20MnCr5 alloy steel using potassium dichromate mixed aqueous NaCl electrolyte and optimization of process parameters [J].
Ayyappan, Solaiyappan ;
Sivakumar, Karuppan .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART B-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MANUFACTURE, 2015, 229 (11) :1984-1996
[5]   Modeling and experimental validation of interelectrode gap in counter-rotating electrochemical machining [J].
Cao, Wenjian ;
Wang, Dengyong ;
Zhu, Di .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 187
[6]   Study on the influence of auxiliary electrode and magnet on electrochemical machining of SS304 using NaCl and NaNO3 [J].
Deepak, J. ;
Hariharan, P. .
SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY-METROLOGY AND PROPERTIES, 2022, 10 (01)
[7]   Anodic electrochemical behaviors of Inconel 718 and Rene 65 alloys in NaNO3 solution [J].
Duan, Shuanglu ;
Liu, Jia ;
Wang, Jingtao ;
Tang, Bo ;
Zhu, Di .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-JMR&T, 2023, 26 :7312-7328
[8]   An experimental study on ultrasonic-assisted drilling of Inconel 718 under different cooling/lubrication conditions [J].
Erturun, Omer Faruk ;
Tekaut, Hasan ;
Cicek, Adem ;
Ucak, Necati ;
Namlu, Ramazan Hakki ;
Lotfi, Bahram ;
Kilic, S. Engin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 130 (1-2) :705-716
[9]  
Guan LZ., 2023, J Phys Conf Ser, V2419, P012044
[10]  
Halpern J., 2014, Electrochemistry cell potentials and thermodynamics