The Mutual Relationships Between ESG, Total Factor Productivity (TFP), and Energy Efficiency (EE) for Chinese Listed Firms

被引:0
作者
Gu, Yuxiao [1 ]
Zeng, Shihong [1 ]
Peng, Qiao [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Technol, Coll Econ & Management, Appl Econ Dept, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
[2] Queens Univ Belfast, Queens Business Sch, Belfast BT9 5EE, North Ireland
关键词
ESG performance; total factor productivity (TFP); energy efficiency (EE); listed enterprises; threshold effect; CASH FLOW; PERFORMANCE; INVESTMENT; GROWTH; INNOVATION; GLOBALIZATION; REGULATIONS; CONSTRAINTS; IMPACT; LEVEL;
D O I
10.3390/su17052296
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study examines the mutual relationships among ESG performance, total factor productivity (TFP), and energy efficiency (EE) in a sample of Chinese A-share listed firms from 2010 to 2022. This study shows that ESG has a significant promotional effect on TFP. Reducing financing constraints and inefficient investment are among the mediating mechanisms, and the latter plays a greater role. Heterogeneity analyses suggest that state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and heavy-polluting enterprises (HPEs) should be consistently committed to ESG responsibility fulfillment. Formal environmental regulation (FER) can be complementary to ESG, but informal environmental regulation (IER) has the opposite effect. TFP was instead suppressed by the triple combined effect of ESG with these two. The results of the threshold effects of ESG and EE indicate that the positive impact on EE becomes more pronounced as ESG performance improves. However, ESG performance varies across subdimensions. As green technology research and development efficiency (GRDE) and green technology transformation efficiency (GTTE) improve, stronger ESG promotes EE. This threshold effect also exhibits heterogeneity with respect to the ownership structure. Moreover, there is bidirectional causality between EE and TFP, and EE has a stronger positive effect on TFP. These findings reveal the optimal paths and potential risks for moving toward sustainability for firms.
引用
收藏
页数:42
相关论文
共 135 条
[61]   Can digital transformation enhance corporate ESG performance? The moderating role of dual environmental regulations [J].
Li, Junjun ;
Wu, Tong ;
Liu, Bailu ;
Zhou, Ming .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 62
[62]   Can heterogeneous environmental policies mitigate ESG divergence? -Based on corporate green innovation and bleaching green behavioral options [J].
Li, Shuangyuan ;
Xu, Xiaoli ;
Zhu, Fuxian .
SUSTAINABLE FUTURES, 2024, 8
[63]   Green finance policy, ESG rating, and cost of debt--Evidence from China [J].
Li, Weihao ;
Hu, Hongbing ;
Hong, Zekun .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 92
[64]   ESG and debt structure: Is the nature of this relationship nonlinear? [J].
Li, Weiwei ;
Padmanabhan, Prasad ;
Huang, Chia-Hsing .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 91
[65]   Government environmental signals, government-Enterprise collusion and corporate pollution transfer [J].
Li, Xiaosheng ;
Wang, Ruirui ;
Shen, Zhiyang ;
Song, Malin .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2024, 139
[66]   ESG performance and investment efficiency [J].
Lian, Yuanqiang ;
Weng, Xiaowen .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 62
[67]   ESG rating, rating divergence and investment efficiency: International evidence [J].
Lin, Yu-En ;
Teng, Shi ;
Yu, Bo ;
Lam, Keith S. K. .
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2025, 100
[68]   Does ESG performance indicate corporate economic sustainability? Evidence based on the sustainable growth rate [J].
Lin, Zihao .
BORSA ISTANBUL REVIEW, 2024, 24 (03) :485-493
[69]  
Litvinova T.N., 2023, ESG Management of the Development of the Green Economy in Central Asia, P429, DOI [10.1007/978-3-031-46525-345, DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-46525-345]
[70]   The Role of Ownership Structure in the Relationship Between Environmental, Social, and Governance Practices and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from China [J].
Liu, Haijing ;
Lee, Hyunah .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (23)