Precision psychiatry: thinking beyond simple prediction models - enhancing causal predictions

被引:1
作者
Krishnadas, Rajeev [1 ]
Leighton, Samuel P. [2 ]
Jones, Peter B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Psychiat, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Glasgow, Sch Hlth & Wellbeing, Glasgow City, Scotland
关键词
Precision medicine; big data; causal inference; diagnostic medicine; machine learning methods; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE;
D O I
10.1192/bjp.2024.258
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Making informed clinical decisions based on individualised outcome predictions is the cornerstone of precision psychiatry. Prediction models currently employed in psychiatry rely on algorithms that map a statistical relationship between clinical features (predictors/risk factors) and subsequent clinical outcomes. They rely on associations that overlook the underlying causal structures within the data, including the presence of latent variables, and the evolution of predictors and outcomes over time. As a result, predictions from sparse associative models from routinely collected data are rarely actionable at an individual level. To be actionable, prediction models should address these shortcomings. We provide a brief overview of a general framework for the rationale for implementing causal and actionable predictions using counterfactual explanations to advance predictive modelling studies, which has translational implications. We have included an extensive glossary of terminology used in this paper and the literature (Supplementary Box 1) and provide a concrete example to demonstrate this conceptually, and a reading list for those interested in this field (Supplementary Box 2).
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 188
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Aliferis C., 2024, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Health Care and Medical Sciences, P477, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-39355-6_10NBSP, 10.1007/978-3-031-39355-610, DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-39355-610, 10.1007/978-3-031-39355-6_10]
[2]   From Real-World Patient Data to Individualized Treatment Effects Using Machine Learning: Current and Future Methods to Address Underlying Challenges [J].
Bica, Ioana ;
Alaa, Ahmed M. ;
Lambert, Craig ;
van der Schaar, Mihaela .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2021, 109 (01) :87-100
[3]  
Chirimuuta M., 2024, The brain abstracted: Simplification in the history and philosophy of neuroscience
[4]   Evaluation of clinical prediction models (part 1): from development to external validation [J].
Collins, Gary S. ;
Dhiman, Paula ;
Ma, Jie ;
Schlussel, Michael M. ;
Archer, Lucinda ;
Van Calster, Ben ;
Harrell Jr, Frank E. ;
Martin, Glen P. ;
Moons, Karel G. M. ;
van Smeden, Maarten ;
Sperrin, Matthew ;
Bullock, Garrett S. ;
Riley, Richard .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 384
[5]  
Colnet B., 2024, PREPRINT
[6]   Psychotic disorders as a framework for precision psychiatry [J].
Coutts, Fiona ;
Koutsouleris, Nikolaos ;
McGuire, Philip .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROLOGY, 2023, 19 (04) :221-234
[7]   Extending inferences from a randomized trial to a target population [J].
Dahabreh, Issa J. ;
Hernan, Miguel A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 34 (08) :719-722
[8]   Detection of calibration drift in clinical prediction models to inform model updating [J].
Davis, Sharon E. ;
Greevy, Robert A. ;
Lasko, Thomas A. ;
Walsh, Colin G. ;
Matheny, Michael E. .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2020, 112
[9]   Integrating Machine Learning with Human Knowledge [J].
Deng, Changyu ;
Ji, Xunbi ;
Rainey, Colton ;
Zhang, Jianyu ;
Lu, Wei .
ISCIENCE, 2020, 23 (11)
[10]   Five points to consider when reading a translational machine-learning paper [J].
Dwyer, Dominic ;
Krishnadas, Rajeev .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 220 (04) :169-171