Concurrent chemoradiation with low-dose and long-duration weekly infusion of gemcitabine in unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN)

被引:1
作者
Ahmad, Farhan [1 ]
Akram, Mohammad [1 ]
Khan, Mohsin [1 ]
机构
[1] Aligarh Muslim Univ, Dept Radiotherapy, Jawaharlal Nehru Med Coll & Hosp, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Gemcitabine; head and neck cancer; low dose long duration; radiosensitizer; LOCALLY ADVANCED HEAD; RADIATION-THERAPY; LUNG-CANCER; RADIOSENSITIZATION; CISPLATIN; TRIAL;
D O I
10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_2271_22
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background:Concurrent chemoradiotherapy now represents the standard of care in locally advanced unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, and the administration of cisplatin in triweekly or weekly schedules is the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agent. However, the chemotherapeutic agent and its scheduling with radiation is still an area of investigation with safer toxicity profile and better response rates. Gemcitabine is a potent radiosensitizer, and non-cytotoxic concentration results in decreased systemic toxicity while maintaining radiosensitization properties. Furthermore, data are emerging for low-dose and long-duration infusion where this strategy is found to be effective and a safe alternative to standard brief infusion. Based on these two strategies, that is, non-cytotoxic concentration with long duration, we have explored the unique possibility of further lowering the toxicity profile without compromising the efficacy. Method:Eligible patients of locally advanced unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck underwent radiation treatment with concurrent gemcitabine. A total dose of 70 Gy in 35 fractions over a period of seven weeks with conventional fractionation schedule was delivered with cord off after 44 Gy. Concurrent gemcitabine was administered intravenously for over two hours once a week, 1-2 h before radiation and for seven consecutive weeks at 50 mg/m(2). Result:Fifty-two patients was enrolled in this study, out of which 41 completed the treatment. Fifty-nine percent completed treatment within seven weeks. Sixty-four percent were found to have received more than five cycles. Mean follow-up of patients was found to be 4.9 months. Sixty-eight percent had complete response. Stage III patients achieved more complete response compared to stage IV. There was no site-wise difference in achieving complete response. Patients who have received less than five chemo cycles or completed the treatment in more than seven weeks had less complete response. Sixty-one percent had severe mucositis while 39% developed mild/moderate mucositis. Considering skin toxicity, 80% were found to have mild/moderate skin toxicity, while only 20% suffered from severe grades of skin toxicity. Conclusion:Gemcitabine in low-dose and long-duration infusion is a potent radiosensitizer with safer hematological toxicity and manageable local toxicities.
引用
收藏
页码:827 / 831
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Intergroup phase III comparison of standard radiation therapy and two schedules of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell head and neck cancer [J].
Adelstein, DJ ;
Li, Y ;
Adams, GL ;
Wagner, H ;
Kish, JA ;
Ensley, JF ;
Schuller, DE ;
Forastiere, AA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (01) :92-98
[2]   Phase II trial of gemcitabine concurrent with radiation for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck [J].
Aguilar-Ponce, JL ;
Granados-García, M ;
Villavicencio, V ;
Poitevin-Chacón, A ;
Green, D ;
Dueñas-González, A ;
Herrera-Gómez, A ;
Luna-Ortiz, K ;
Alvarado, A ;
Martínez-Said, H ;
Castillo-Henkel, C ;
Segura-Pacheco, B ;
De la Garza, J .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2004, 15 (02) :301-306
[3]   Neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy using infusional gemcitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer: A phase II trial [J].
Bazarbashi, Shouki ;
Elshenawy, Mahmoud A. ;
Badran, Ahmed ;
Aljubran, Ali ;
Alzahrani, Ahmed ;
Almanea, Hadeel ;
Alsuhaibani, Abdullah ;
Alashwah, Ahmed ;
Neimatallah, Mohamed ;
Abduljabbar, Alaa ;
Ashari, Luai ;
Alhomoud, Samar ;
Ghebeh, Hazem ;
Elhassan, Tusneem ;
Alsanea, Nasser ;
Mohiuddin, Mohammed .
CANCER MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (10) :2056-2066
[4]   Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck [J].
Bonner, JA ;
Harari, PM ;
Giralt, J ;
Azarnia, N ;
Shin, DM ;
Cohen, RB ;
Jones, CU ;
Sur, R ;
Raben, D ;
Jassem, J ;
Ove, R ;
Kies, MS ;
Baselga, J ;
Youssoufian, H ;
Amellal, N ;
Rowinsky, EK ;
Ang, KK .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (06) :567-578
[5]   Pharmacokinetic evaluation of gemcitabine and 2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine-5′-triphosphate after prolonged infusion in patients affected by different solid tumors [J].
Cattel, L. ;
Airoldi, M. ;
Delprino, L. ;
Passera, R. ;
Milla, P. ;
Pedani, F. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 :V142-V147
[6]  
Chauhan A, 2008, AFR HEALTH SCI, V8, P149
[7]   Radiation concurrent with gemcitabine for locally advanced head and neck cancer: A phase I trial and intracellular drug incorporation study [J].
Eisbruch, A ;
Shewach, DS ;
Bradford, CR ;
Littles, JF ;
Teknos, TN ;
Chepeha, DB ;
Marentette, LJ ;
Terrell, JE ;
Hogikyan, ND ;
Dawson, LA ;
Urba, S ;
Wolf, GT ;
Lawrence, TS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (03) :792-799
[8]   Radiosensitization of pancreatic cancer cells by 2',2'-difluoro-2'-deoxycytidine [J].
Lawrence, TS ;
Chang, EY ;
Hahn, TM ;
Hertel, LW ;
Shewach, DS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 34 (04) :867-872
[9]   Phase II clinical investigation of gemcitabine in advanced soft tissue sarcomas and window evaluation of dose rate on gemcitabine triphosphate accumulation [J].
Patel, SR ;
Gandhi, V ;
Jenkins, J ;
Papadopolous, N ;
Burgess, MA ;
Plager, C ;
Plunkett , W ;
Benjamin, RS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (15) :3483-3489
[10]   Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): An update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients [J].
Pignon, Jean-Pierre ;
le Maitre, Aurelie ;
Maillard, Emilie ;
Bourhis, Jean .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2009, 92 (01) :4-14