The Alternative Approach to the Lumbosacral Segment: The Right-Sided Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

被引:0
|
作者
Szabo, Viktor [1 ]
Berta, Balazs [1 ]
Nagy, Mate [1 ]
Kulcsar, Dominik [1 ]
Perlaki, Gabor [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Schwarcz, Attila [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pecs, Med Sch, Dept Neurosurg, Pecs, Hungary
[2] Univ Pecs, Ctr Neurosc, HUN REN PTE Clin Neurosc MR Res Grp, Pecs, Hungary
[3] Univ Pecs, Med Sch, Dept Neurol, Pecs, Hungary
关键词
ALIF; Anterior lumbar interbody fusion; Lumbosacral; Oblique lumbar interbody fusion; Right-sided OLIF; VASCULAR ANATOMY; ILIAC VEIN; SPINE; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES; L5-S1;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123823
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with dorsal percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (ALIF+D) is a well-described technique treating lumbosacral degenerative diseases. Mobilizing the common iliac arteries and veins during the ALIF+D approach may increase the risk of bleeding when the bifurcations are low. This study demonstrates that in such cases, the right-sided oblique lumbar interbody fusion with dorsal percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (OLIF+D) offers a novel alternative to the ALIF+D approach. METHODS: Twenty-one patients were operated on with the ALIF+D approach, and 20 patients were operated on using the right-sided OLIF+D technique. Computed tomography-based imaging and clinical data, such as patient-reported outcomes, were collected. RESULTS: Both ALIF+D and OLIF+D surgeries elicited a statistically significant decrease (P 5 0.001) between the preoperative and postoperative Oswestry disability index and the back and leg pain visual analog scale scores. A significant increase was observed in both techniques between preoperative and postoperative anterior segmental height, posterior segmental height, and segmental lordosis (P 5 0.001). There were no statistically significant postoperative differences between patients operated by ALIF+D and patients operated by OLIF+D in the segmental lordosis angle (P = 0.354), anterior segmental height (P = 0.297), posterior segmental height (P = 0.404), Oswestry disability index (P = 0.824), or back and leg visual analog scale scores (P = 0.682 and P = 0.979, respectively). The OLIF+D group showed trend-like higher blood loss (198 +/- 118 mL vs. 134 +/- 77 mL; P = 0.058) and significantly longer surgical time (199 +/- 47 vs. 169 +/- 54 minutes; P = 0.009) compared to the ALIF+D group. CONCLUSIONS: The right-sided lumbosacral OLIF+D approach is an alternative to the ALIF+D approach if the latter is hazardous due to vessel anatomy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Biomechanical comparison: stability of lateral-approach anterior lumbar interbody fusion and lateral fixation compared with anterior-approach anterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterior fixation in the lower lumbar spine
    Kim, SM
    Lim, TJ
    Paterno, J
    Park, J
    Kim, DH
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2005, 2 (01) : 62 - 68
  • [42] Ureter Injury as a Complication of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Lee, Hyeong-Jin
    Kim, Jin-Sung
    Ryu, Kyeong-Sik
    Park, Choon Keun
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 102 : 693.e7
  • [43] Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Stereotactic Navigation: Technical Note
    Choy, Winward
    Mayer, Rory Richard
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    Chou, Dean
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 10 : 94S - 100S
  • [44] Minimally invasive anterior oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) for degenerative lumbar disease
    Ye, Jia-Hui
    Ding, Jia-Ling
    Xiang, Zi-Yue
    Zhu, Si-Pin
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 43 (12) : 1214 - 1215
  • [45] Minimally invasive anterior, lateral, and oblique lumbar interbody fusion: a literature review
    Xu, David S.
    Walker, Corey T.
    Godzik, Jakub
    Turner, Jay D.
    Smith, William
    Uribe, Juan S.
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2018, 6 (06)
  • [46] A Radiological Comparison of Anterior Fusion Rates in Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    McCarthy, M. J. H.
    Ng, L.
    Vermeersch, G.
    Chan, D.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 2 (04) : 195 - 206
  • [47] Fusion rate and complications of oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a meta-analysis
    Xiao, Xun
    Duan, Heng
    Pan, Xin
    Zhao, Hua
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2024, 11
  • [48] The Research on Spinopelvic Parameters and Clinical Outcomes of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of
    Yang, Pengchao
    Dong, Yimin
    Xu, Yong
    Kang, Honglei
    Li, Feng
    Guan, Hanfeng
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 190 : E841 - E850
  • [49] Salvage Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Pseudoarthrosis After Posterior or Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Review of 10 Patients
    Yun, Dong-Ju
    Yu, Jae-Won
    Jeon, Sang-Hyeop
    Lee, Hyung-Chang
    Lee, Sang-Ho
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 111 : E746 - E755
  • [50] Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Osteobiologics for Lumbar Fusion
    Kim, Young-Hoon
    Ha, Kee-Yong
    Kim, Youn-Soo
    Kim, Ki-Won
    Rhyu, Kee-Won
    Park, Jong-Beom
    Shin, Jae-Hyuk
    Kim, Young-Yul
    Lee, Jun-Seok
    Park, Hyung-Youl
    Ko, Jaeryong
    Kim, Sang-Il
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 16 (06) : 1022 - 1033