The Alternative Approach to the Lumbosacral Segment: The Right-Sided Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

被引:0
|
作者
Szabo, Viktor [1 ]
Berta, Balazs [1 ]
Nagy, Mate [1 ]
Kulcsar, Dominik [1 ]
Perlaki, Gabor [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Schwarcz, Attila [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pecs, Med Sch, Dept Neurosurg, Pecs, Hungary
[2] Univ Pecs, Ctr Neurosc, HUN REN PTE Clin Neurosc MR Res Grp, Pecs, Hungary
[3] Univ Pecs, Med Sch, Dept Neurol, Pecs, Hungary
关键词
ALIF; Anterior lumbar interbody fusion; Lumbosacral; Oblique lumbar interbody fusion; Right-sided OLIF; VASCULAR ANATOMY; ILIAC VEIN; SPINE; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES; L5-S1;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123823
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with dorsal percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (ALIF+D) is a well-described technique treating lumbosacral degenerative diseases. Mobilizing the common iliac arteries and veins during the ALIF+D approach may increase the risk of bleeding when the bifurcations are low. This study demonstrates that in such cases, the right-sided oblique lumbar interbody fusion with dorsal percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (OLIF+D) offers a novel alternative to the ALIF+D approach. METHODS: Twenty-one patients were operated on with the ALIF+D approach, and 20 patients were operated on using the right-sided OLIF+D technique. Computed tomography-based imaging and clinical data, such as patient-reported outcomes, were collected. RESULTS: Both ALIF+D and OLIF+D surgeries elicited a statistically significant decrease (P 5 0.001) between the preoperative and postoperative Oswestry disability index and the back and leg pain visual analog scale scores. A significant increase was observed in both techniques between preoperative and postoperative anterior segmental height, posterior segmental height, and segmental lordosis (P 5 0.001). There were no statistically significant postoperative differences between patients operated by ALIF+D and patients operated by OLIF+D in the segmental lordosis angle (P = 0.354), anterior segmental height (P = 0.297), posterior segmental height (P = 0.404), Oswestry disability index (P = 0.824), or back and leg visual analog scale scores (P = 0.682 and P = 0.979, respectively). The OLIF+D group showed trend-like higher blood loss (198 +/- 118 mL vs. 134 +/- 77 mL; P = 0.058) and significantly longer surgical time (199 +/- 47 vs. 169 +/- 54 minutes; P = 0.009) compared to the ALIF+D group. CONCLUSIONS: The right-sided lumbosacral OLIF+D approach is an alternative to the ALIF+D approach if the latter is hazardous due to vessel anatomy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion as an Adjunct to Posterior Instrumented Correction of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis
    Crandall, Dennis G.
    Revella, Jan
    SPINE, 2009, 34 (20) : 2126 - 2133
  • [32] Evaluation of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Performed
    Guyer, Richard D.
    Zigler, Jack E.
    Blumenthal, Scott L.
    Shellock, Jessica L.
    Ohnmeiss, Donna D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2023, 17 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [33] Reasons for revision following stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Nguyen, Austin Q.
    Harvey, Jackson P.
    Khanna, Krishn
    Basques, Bryce A.
    Harada, Garrett K.
    Phillips, Frank M.
    Singh, Kern
    Dewald, Christopher
    An, Howard S.
    Colman, Matthew W.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2021, 35 (01) : 60 - 66
  • [34] Revision of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical study in nonosteoporotic bone Laboratory investigation
    Ploumis, Avraam
    Wu, Chunhui
    Mehbod, Amir
    Fischer, Gustav
    Faundez, Antonio
    Wu, Wentien
    Transfeldt, Ensor
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2010, 12 (01) : 82 - 87
  • [35] Effect of Approach Based Lumbar Interbody Fusion on Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters and Functional Outcomes: Comparison between Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)
    Jain, Mantu
    Sethy, Siddharth S.
    Sahoo, Auroshish
    Khan, Shahnawaz
    Tripathy, Sujit
    Ramasubbu, Mathan Kumar
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2025, 59 (01) : 40 - 46
  • [36] Indications for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Mobbs, Ralph J.
    Loganathan, Aji
    Yeung, Vivian
    Rao, Prashanth J.
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2013, 5 (03) : 153 - 163
  • [37] Comparing stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion with posterior lumbar interbody fusion for revision of rostral adjacent segment disease A STROBE-compliant study
    Zhu, Guangduo
    Hao, Yingjie
    Yu, Lei
    Cai, Yingchun
    Yang, Xiaowei
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (40)
  • [38] Anatomical Feasibility of Right Oblique Approach for L5-S1 Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Song, Se-Jin
    Shin, Myung-Hoon
    Kim, Jong-Tae
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 132 : E403 - E408
  • [39] Risk Factors for Subsidence Following Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Zavras, Athan G.
    Federico, Vincent
    Nolte, Michael T.
    Butler, Alexander J.
    Dandu, Navya
    Munim, Mohammed
    Harper, Daniel E.
    Lopez, Gregory D.
    DeWald, Christopher J.
    An, Howard S.
    Singh, Kern
    Phillips, Frank M.
    Colman, Matthew W.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 14 (01) : 257 - 264
  • [40] Anterior lumbar interbody fusion for lumbosacral junction in steep sacral slope
    Kim, Sei-Yoon
    Maeng, Dae Hyeon
    Lee, Sang-Ho
    Jang, Jee-Soo
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2008, 21 (01): : 33 - 38