The Alternative Approach to the Lumbosacral Segment: The Right-Sided Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

被引:0
|
作者
Szabo, Viktor [1 ]
Berta, Balazs [1 ]
Nagy, Mate [1 ]
Kulcsar, Dominik [1 ]
Perlaki, Gabor [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Schwarcz, Attila [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pecs, Med Sch, Dept Neurosurg, Pecs, Hungary
[2] Univ Pecs, Ctr Neurosc, HUN REN PTE Clin Neurosc MR Res Grp, Pecs, Hungary
[3] Univ Pecs, Med Sch, Dept Neurol, Pecs, Hungary
关键词
ALIF; Anterior lumbar interbody fusion; Lumbosacral; Oblique lumbar interbody fusion; Right-sided OLIF; VASCULAR ANATOMY; ILIAC VEIN; SPINE; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES; L5-S1;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123823
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with dorsal percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (ALIF+D) is a well-described technique treating lumbosacral degenerative diseases. Mobilizing the common iliac arteries and veins during the ALIF+D approach may increase the risk of bleeding when the bifurcations are low. This study demonstrates that in such cases, the right-sided oblique lumbar interbody fusion with dorsal percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (OLIF+D) offers a novel alternative to the ALIF+D approach. METHODS: Twenty-one patients were operated on with the ALIF+D approach, and 20 patients were operated on using the right-sided OLIF+D technique. Computed tomography-based imaging and clinical data, such as patient-reported outcomes, were collected. RESULTS: Both ALIF+D and OLIF+D surgeries elicited a statistically significant decrease (P 5 0.001) between the preoperative and postoperative Oswestry disability index and the back and leg pain visual analog scale scores. A significant increase was observed in both techniques between preoperative and postoperative anterior segmental height, posterior segmental height, and segmental lordosis (P 5 0.001). There were no statistically significant postoperative differences between patients operated by ALIF+D and patients operated by OLIF+D in the segmental lordosis angle (P = 0.354), anterior segmental height (P = 0.297), posterior segmental height (P = 0.404), Oswestry disability index (P = 0.824), or back and leg visual analog scale scores (P = 0.682 and P = 0.979, respectively). The OLIF+D group showed trend-like higher blood loss (198 +/- 118 mL vs. 134 +/- 77 mL; P = 0.058) and significantly longer surgical time (199 +/- 47 vs. 169 +/- 54 minutes; P = 0.009) compared to the ALIF+D group. CONCLUSIONS: The right-sided lumbosacral OLIF+D approach is an alternative to the ALIF+D approach if the latter is hazardous due to vessel anatomy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of surgical outcomes between oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF)
    Chung, Hee-Woong
    Lee, Han-Dong
    Jeon, Chang-Hoon
    Chung, Nam-Su
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 209
  • [22] A Comparative Study between Single-Level Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Adjacent Segment Disease
    Chang, Chung-Tse
    Lin, Yu-Hsien
    Wu, Yun-Che
    Shih, Cheng-Min
    Chen, Kun-Hui
    Pan, Chien-Chou
    Lee, Cheng-Hung
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (19)
  • [23] Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using a Personalized Approach: Is Custom the Future of Implants for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery?
    Mobbs, Ralph J.
    Parr, William C. H.
    Choy, Wen Jie
    McEvoy, Aidan
    Walsh, William R.
    Phan, Kevin
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 124 : 452 - +
  • [24] The effect of obesity on perioperative morbidity in oblique lumbar interbody fusion
    Xi, Zhuo
    Burch, Shane
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    Mayer, Rory Richard
    Eichler, Charles
    Chou, Dean
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2020, 33 (02) : 203 - 210
  • [25] Evolution of Design of Interbody Cages for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Phan, Kevin
    Mobbs, Ralph J.
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2016, 8 (03) : 270 - 277
  • [26] Comparison between Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MISTLIF) for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Chandra, Vemula V. R.
    Prasad, Bodapati C. M.
    Hanu, Tammireddy G.
    Kale, Pavan G.
    NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2022, 70 (01) : 127 - 134
  • [27] Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) versus Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) in Interbody Fusion Technique for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chang, Min Cheol
    Kim, Gang-Un
    Choo, Yoo Jin
    Lee, Gun Woo
    LIFE-BASEL, 2021, 11 (07):
  • [28] Lateral lumbar interbody fusion at the lumbosacral junction
    Siu, Timothy L. T.
    Lin, Kainu
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 43 : 178 - 184
  • [29] Mini-Open Anterior Retroperitoneal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Degeneration Disease
    Ohtori, Seiji
    Orita, Sumihisa
    Yamauchi, Kazuyo
    Eguchi, Yawara
    Ochiai, Nobuyasu
    Kishida, Shunji
    Kuniyoshi, Kazuki
    Aoki, Yasuchika
    Nakamura, Junichi
    Ishikawa, Tetsuhiro
    Miyagi, Masayuki
    Kamoda, Hiroto
    Suzuki, Miyako
    Kubota, Gou
    Sakuma, Yoshihiro
    Oikawa, Yasuhiro
    Inage, Kazuhide
    Sainoh, Takeshi
    Sato, Jun
    Fujimoto, Kazuki
    Shiga, Yasuhiro
    Abe, Koki
    Toyone, Tomoaki
    Inoue, Gen
    Takahashi, Kazuhisa
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 56 (04) : 1051 - 1059
  • [30] Comparison between intervertebral oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study
    Takaoka, Hiromitsu
    Inage, Kazuhide
    Eguchi, Yawara
    Shiga, Yasuhiro
    Furuya, Takeo
    Maki, Satoshi
    Aoki, Yasuchika
    Inoue, Masahiro
    Fujiyoshi, Takayuki
    Miyamoto, Takuya
    Noguchi, Yuji
    Nakamura, Shinichiro
    Kinoshita, Tomoaki
    Kamada, Takahito
    Takahashi, Hiroshi
    Saito, Junya
    Norimoto, Masaki
    Kotani, Toshiaki
    Sakuma, Tsuyoshi
    Iijima, Yasushi
    Ishikawa, Tetsuhiro
    Umimura, Tomotaka
    Ohta, Mitsutoshi
    Suzuki-Narita, Miyako
    Enomoto, Keigo
    Sato, Takashi
    Sato, Masashi
    Suzuki, Masahiro
    Hozumi, Takashi
    Kim, Geundong
    Mizuki, Norichika
    Tsuchiya, Ryuto
    Otagiri, Takuma
    Mukaihata, Tomohito
    Hishiya, Takahisa
    Ohtori, Seiji
    Orita, Sumihisa
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)